[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19282?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16285821#comment-16285821
]
Anastasia Braginsky edited comment on HBASE-19282 at 12/11/17 12:00 PM:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
After we have run experiments on HDD we can see that CompactingMemStore working
with MSLAB accompanied with CCM index are performing better than when
accompanied with CAM (CellArrayMap) index. Please see the attached document.
As a conclusion we suggest to enable CCM as a default index with
CompactingMemStore when MSLAB is defined. What do you think [~stack],
[~ram_krish], [~anoop.hbase], [~eshcar]?
was (Author: anastas):
After we have run experiments on HDD we can see that CompactingMemStore working
with MSLAB accompanied with CCM index are performing better than when
accompanied with CAM (CellArrayMap) index. Please see the attached document.
> CellChunkMap Benchmarking and User Interface
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-19282
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19282
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Anastasia Braginsky
> Attachments: CCM Benchmarking.pdf
>
>
> We have made some experiments how working with CellChunkMap (CCM) influences
> the performance when running on-heap and off-heap. Based on those results it
> is suggested to tie the MSLAB usage (off-heap or on-heap) with CCM index
> usage.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
