[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16703) Explore object pooling of SeekerState

2016-09-26 Thread Andrew Purtell (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15523359#comment-15523359 ] Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-16703: Bear in mind what I am seeing is in the JFR trace 35% of

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16703) Explore object pooling of SeekerState

2016-09-26 Thread ramkrishna.s.vasudevan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15522257#comment-15522257 ] ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-16703: Thanks [~apurtell]. > Explore object

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16703) Explore object pooling of SeekerState

2016-09-26 Thread binlijin (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15522244#comment-15522244 ] binlijin commented on HBASE-16703: -- 0.98 is the same as master and branch 1. I think the

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16703) Explore object pooling of SeekerState

2016-09-26 Thread Anoop Sam John (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15522176#comment-15522176 ] Anoop Sam John commented on HBASE-16703: Ya as long as we are within the same read op, we will

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16703) Explore object pooling of SeekerState

2016-09-25 Thread Andrew Purtell (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15522149#comment-15522149 ] Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-16703: Go for it Ram, thank you > Explore object pooling of

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16703) Explore object pooling of SeekerState

2016-09-25 Thread ramkrishna.s.vasudevan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15522125#comment-15522125 ] ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-16703: [~apurtell] I was working on this area

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16703) Explore object pooling of SeekerState

2016-09-25 Thread Andrew Purtell (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15522083#comment-15522083 ] Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-16703: Ah, I updated the description on the issue. Next time

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16703) Explore object pooling of SeekerState

2016-09-25 Thread binlijin (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15522005#comment-15522005 ] binlijin commented on HBASE-16703: -- SeekerState is

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16703) Explore object pooling of SeekerState

2016-09-25 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15521992#comment-15521992 ] stack commented on HBASE-16703: --- Any pictures to show us [~apurtell] w/ the hot allocations? Or, dumb

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16703) Explore object pooling of SeekerState

2016-09-24 Thread Andrew Purtell (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15519758#comment-15519758 ] Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-16703: There's no reason we can't hold on to earlier allocated