[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16795?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15560484#comment-15560484 ]
Ted Yu commented on HBASE-16795: -------------------------------- [~misty]: What do you think ? > Revisit 'in project Maven repo' checked in as part of HBASE-14785 > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HBASE-16795 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16795 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Andrew Purtell > > I did a naive update of docs on branch-1.1 from master like so: > {noformat} > $ git co master src > ... > {noformat} > and the result failed a RAT check. Looking at rat.txt I noticed we are > including binaries in our source tarball, checked in as part of HBASE-14785. > {noformat} > HBASE-14785 Addendum: Add an in-project Maven repo > src/main/site/resources/css/site.css | 1 - > .../maven-fluido-skin/1.5-HBASE/maven-fluido-skin-1.5-HBASE.jar | Bin 0 -> > 344936 bytes > .../maven-fluido-skin/1.5-HBASE/maven-fluido-skin-1.5-HBASE.pom | 718 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > .../maven/skins/maven-fluido-skin/maven-metadata-local.xml | 12 + > 4 files changed, 730 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > {noformat} > I'm not sure why RAT flagged this in that 1.1 build when I see that > previously we have copied back docs from master into the branch. Perhaps > previous copies have been more selective. > This change has been committed for over a year. Let's make sure we have > discussed this and determined it is appropriate. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)