[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13082435#comment-13082435
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-1938:
Yes, I believe Andy's issue was cause by:
- the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13078377#comment-13078377
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-1938:
For any future modification on this part: on jdk 1.6.24,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13072284#comment-13072284
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-1938:
Ok, I understand what's going on.
The enhancement on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13072402#comment-13072402
]
stack commented on HBASE-1938:
--
Sounds great nkeywal. Thanks for digging in here.
Make
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13071842#comment-13071842
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-1938:
bq. Any chance of our calling a 'next' without doing a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13071973#comment-13071973
]
Hudson commented on HBASE-1938:
---
Integrated in HBase-TRUNK #2056 (See
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13071991#comment-13071991
]
Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-1938:
---
20110726_1938* apply cleanly to 0.90 as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13072025#comment-13072025
]
Todd Lipcon commented on HBASE-1938:
The iterator one seems like a no-brainer for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13072046#comment-13072046
]
Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-1938:
---
bq. the bits that change the read-point
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13072051#comment-13072051
]
Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-1938:
---
Applied 20110726_1938_KeyValueSkipListSet
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13072052#comment-13072052
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-1938:
Ok, that's strange. This patch includes multiple small
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13072057#comment-13072057
]
Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-1938:
---
I ran 3 consecutive tests with MemStore
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13072058#comment-13072058
]
stack commented on HBASE-1938:
--
Let me back out application of MemStore patch till we figure
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13072061#comment-13072061
]
stack commented on HBASE-1938:
--
Reverted 20110726_1938_MemStore.patch for now on TRUNK (left
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13072064#comment-13072064
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-1938:
Yes, I can provide a patch with all the changes except
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13072073#comment-13072073
]
Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-1938:
---
This is a representative test with 0.90
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13072085#comment-13072085
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-1938:
Thank you. It's interesting because the tests with 15
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13072091#comment-13072091
]
Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-1938:
---
I see the same type of results with either
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13070987#comment-13070987
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-1938:
I will write the patch, that will be simpler :-).
What
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13071196#comment-13071196
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-1938:
I have an improvement that could make a real difference.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13071209#comment-13071209
]
stack commented on HBASE-1938:
--
@nkeywal nice one!
Make in-memory table scanning faster
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13071227#comment-13071227
]
stack commented on HBASE-1938:
--
@nkeywal I'm not as lazy this morning as I was yesterday so
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13071363#comment-13071363
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-1938:
Thanks Stack! It could be considered as a JDK bug, as it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13071484#comment-13071484
]
stack commented on HBASE-1938:
--
On 20110726_1938_MemStore.patch:
FYI, in future, just remove
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13071486#comment-13071486
]
stack commented on HBASE-1938:
--
+1 on 20110726_1938_KeyValueSkipListSet.patch It looks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13070371#comment-13070371
]
vamshi commented on HBASE-1938:
---
Hi stack, how can we perform lookup/scanning in HBase? can
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13070458#comment-13070458
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-1938:
Hello Stack,
accesses and perhaps to make it go faster.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13070819#comment-13070819
]
stack commented on HBASE-1938:
--
bq. To me, it makes sense to precalculate the value returned
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13070829#comment-13070829
]
Ted Yu commented on HBASE-1938:
---
bq. 1) Replacement of KeyValue lowest = getLowest();
It is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13070067#comment-13070067
]
stack commented on HBASE-1938:
--
bq. I modified the unit test to make it work with the trunk
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13069626#comment-13069626
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-1938:
I modified the unit test to make it work with the trunk
31 matches
Mail list logo
