[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16324811#comment-16324811
]
Hudson commented on HBASE-19694:
FAILURE: Integrated in Jenkins build HBase-Trunk_matrix
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16324391#comment-16324391
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-19694:
---
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16323521#comment-16323521
]
Hudson commented on HBASE-19694:
FAILURE: Integrated in Jenkins build HBase-Trunk_matrix
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16323099#comment-16323099
]
stack commented on HBASE-19694:
---
New set of timeouts TestMultiColumnScanner, or TestCompoun
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16323065#comment-16323065
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-19694:
---
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16322848#comment-16322848
]
stack commented on HBASE-19694:
---
.012 is .005 on top of the zk changes, HBASE-19753.
> The
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16322757#comment-16322757
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-19694:
---
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16322520#comment-16322520
]
stack commented on HBASE-19694:
---
This is another combined patch. Its .005 above with latest
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16322410#comment-16322410
]
stack commented on HBASE-19694:
---
Misc timeouts including some old favorites, TestHCM, and T
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16322317#comment-16322317
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-19694:
---
You could try removing the wait until connected lo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16322308#comment-16322308
]
stack commented on HBASE-19694:
---
That looks additive on top of the patch I have here [~Apac
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16322116#comment-16322116
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-19694:
---
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16321996#comment-16321996
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-19694:
---
And it is a bit strange, is there any problem with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16321980#comment-16321980
]
stack commented on HBASE-19694:
---
bq. I think you need to figure out the problem with your c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16321971#comment-16321971
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-19694:
---
I think you need to figure out the problem with yo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16321963#comment-16321963
]
stack commented on HBASE-19694:
---
Testing on my wonky cluster, TestHCM is failing because Ma
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16321919#comment-16321919
]
stack commented on HBASE-19694:
---
.009 has this patch and latest from HBASE-19753
> The ini
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16321915#comment-16321915
]
stack commented on HBASE-19694:
---
I put a suggested patch up on HBASE-19753. Let me put up a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16321850#comment-16321850
]
stack commented on HBASE-19694:
---
The failure is interesting. The test wants to see how long
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16321837#comment-16321837
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-19694:
---
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16321717#comment-16321717
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-19694:
---
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16321690#comment-16321690
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-19694:
---
For TestHCM, I think the problem is the timeout te
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16321612#comment-16321612
]
stack commented on HBASE-19694:
---
.007 includes HBASE-19753. Lets see how it does.
> The in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16321428#comment-16321428
]
stack commented on HBASE-19694:
---
bq. In my experience, this isn't fatal, it just slows thin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16321305#comment-16321305
]
Mike Drob commented on HBASE-19694:
---
I've seen this one too, but didn't spend too much
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16321263#comment-16321263
]
stack commented on HBASE-19694:
---
[~Apache9] Yeah. Wrong place. But I like the result. Will
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16321172#comment-16321172
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-19694:
---
Wrong place sir? The latest patch are for HBASE-19
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16321155#comment-16321155
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-19694:
---
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16321085#comment-16321085
]
stack commented on HBASE-19694:
---
Random timeouts:
TestHCM
TestAsyncTableBatch
TestFromClie
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16320929#comment-16320929
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-19694:
---
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16320927#comment-16320927
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-19694:
---
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16320886#comment-16320886
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-19694:
---
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16320639#comment-16320639
]
stack commented on HBASE-19694:
---
I had two runs land here. First had test failure and no ti
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16320633#comment-16320633
]
stack commented on HBASE-19694:
---
.005 Fix unit test failure. No timeouts this time. Seems g
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16320608#comment-16320608
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-19694:
---
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16320607#comment-16320607
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-19694:
---
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16320317#comment-16320317
]
stack commented on HBASE-19694:
---
.004 addresses review up on rb. .003 had four timeouts. I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16320021#comment-16320021
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-19694:
---
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16319870#comment-16319870
]
stack commented on HBASE-19694:
---
.003 Fix unit test failures (Removed innocent seeming chec
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16319824#comment-16319824
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-19694:
---
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16319707#comment-16319707
]
stack commented on HBASE-19694:
---
Some history... the start of a thread inside Master constr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16319704#comment-16319704
]
stack commented on HBASE-19694:
---
.002 fixes checkstyle and unit tests. I was setting active
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16319697#comment-16319697
]
stack commented on HBASE-19694:
---
In HRegionServer we have this:
// In case colocated m
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16319590#comment-16319590
]
stack commented on HBASE-19694:
---
bq. I think in the old time backup master could perform as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16319586#comment-16319586
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-19694:
---
I think in the old time backup master could perfor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16319578#comment-16319578
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-19694:
---
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16319327#comment-16319327
]
Appy commented on HBASE-19694:
--
+1
> The initialization order for a fresh cluster is incorr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16319155#comment-16319155
]
stack commented on HBASE-19694:
---
.001 simplifies the server startup. Purges the latch thing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16319079#comment-16319079
]
stack commented on HBASE-19694:
---
HBASE-16367 claimed to have fixed this but dodgy-looking w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16318852#comment-16318852
]
stack commented on HBASE-19694:
---
Just ran into this.
2018-01-09 10:04:45,463 INFO
[maste
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16311339#comment-16311339
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-19694:
---
Thanks sir.
> The initialization order for a fres
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16310673#comment-16310673
]
stack commented on HBASE-19694:
---
I can take this in a day or two np [~Apache9]
> The init
52 matches
Mail list logo