[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13159778#comment-13159778
]
Hudson commented on HBASE-4739:
---
Integrated in HBase-0.92 #163 (See
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13156628#comment-13156628
]
Hudson commented on HBASE-4739:
---
Integrated in HBase-TRUNK-security #7 (See
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13156201#comment-13156201
]
Jean-Daniel Cryans commented on HBASE-4739:
---
bq. Do we need make a patch for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13156472#comment-13156472
]
Ted Yu commented on HBASE-4739:
---
Integrated to 0.92 branch and TRUNK.
Thanks for the patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13156500#comment-13156500
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-4739:
--
-1 overall. Here are the results of testing the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13156503#comment-13156503
]
Hudson commented on HBASE-4739:
---
Integrated in HBase-TRUNK #2476 (See
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13156546#comment-13156546
]
Hudson commented on HBASE-4739:
---
Integrated in HBase-0.92-security #11 (See
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13155048#comment-13155048
]
ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-4739:
---
+1 for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13155050#comment-13155050
]
gaojinchao commented on HBASE-4739:
---
This patch is not compatible, I added
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13155166#comment-13155166
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-4739:
--
-1 overall. Here are the results of testing the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13155309#comment-13155309
]
Ted Yu commented on HBASE-4739:
---
All the test failures were caused by 'Too many open files'.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13155320#comment-13155320
]
Ted Yu commented on HBASE-4739:
---
Nice work, Jinchao.
{code}
//RS_ZK_REGION_CLOSING
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13155328#comment-13155328
]
ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-4739:
---
@Ted
In 0.90.5 the CLOSING
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13155330#comment-13155330
]
Ted Yu commented on HBASE-4739:
---
We will keep RS_ZK_REGION_CLOSING event for 0.90.x
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13155600#comment-13155600
]
gaojinchao commented on HBASE-4739:
---
@Ted
It seems 0.90.5 logic is ok.
1. if
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13155689#comment-13155689
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-4739:
--
-1 overall. Here are the results of testing the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13154749#comment-13154749
]
Jean-Daniel Cryans commented on HBASE-4739:
---
I prefer the latest patch, although
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13154758#comment-13154758
]
stack commented on HBASE-4739:
--
Is this state misnamed? Is the comment below saying that the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13153969#comment-13153969
]
gaojinchao commented on HBASE-4739:
---
HBASE-4739_trail5 made a few changes, Please
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13153999#comment-13153999
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-4739:
--
-1 overall. Here are the results of testing the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13154001#comment-13154001
]
ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-4739:
---
This is similar to the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13154010#comment-13154010
]
gaojinchao commented on HBASE-4739:
---
I think we don't need handle
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13154026#comment-13154026
]
ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-4739:
---
Yes Gao.. thats is what i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13151923#comment-13151923
]
gaojinchao commented on HBASE-4739:
---
Only sends a RPC, I think state machine lose a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13151998#comment-13151998
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-4739:
--
-1 overall. Here are the results of testing the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13152021#comment-13152021
]
gaojinchao commented on HBASE-4739:
---
Not completed the test ,tomorrow continue!
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13152434#comment-13152434
]
Jean-Daniel Cryans commented on HBASE-4739:
---
I'm really uneasy with adding a new
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13152585#comment-13152585
]
gaojinchao commented on HBASE-4739:
---
@J-D
In 0.92 version, uses HBASE-4739_Trunk_V2 in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13151197#comment-13151197
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-4739:
--
-1 overall. Here are the results of testing the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13151455#comment-13151455
]
Ted Yu commented on HBASE-4739:
---
Trial patch makes sense.
For unassign, the following
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13151712#comment-13151712
]
gaojinchao commented on HBASE-4739:
---
trail2 fixed your comment. if you and Ram make
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13151761#comment-13151761
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-4739:
--
-1 overall. Here are the results of testing the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13151765#comment-13151765
]
Ted Yu commented on HBASE-4739:
---
The failed tests don't seem to be related to the changes in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13151831#comment-13151831
]
ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-4739:
---
@Gao
Good work... One
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13150310#comment-13150310
]
gaojinchao commented on HBASE-4739:
---
about test failed:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13150325#comment-13150325
]
gaojinchao commented on HBASE-4739:
---
I made a issue for 2:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13150339#comment-13150339
]
Ted Yu commented on HBASE-4739:
---
Jinchao:
Do you want to show us your more complicated patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13149528#comment-13149528
]
gaojinchao commented on HBASE-4739:
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13149532#comment-13149532
]
gaojinchao commented on HBASE-4739:
---
Please review this patch.
Master
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13149660#comment-13149660
]
Ted Yu commented on HBASE-4739:
---
Why was the check for zk node existence in actOnTimeOut()
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13149727#comment-13149727
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-4739:
--
-1 overall. Here are the results of testing the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13150142#comment-13150142
]
gaojinchao commented on HBASE-4739:
---
Why was the check for zk node existence in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13150168#comment-13150168
]
gaojinchao commented on HBASE-4739:
---
V2 fixs Ted's comment.
In my local, replication
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13150188#comment-13150188
]
Ted Yu commented on HBASE-4739:
---
+1 if tests pass.
Master dying while
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13150227#comment-13150227
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-4739:
--
-1 overall. Here are the results of testing the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13150265#comment-13150265
]
ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-4739:
---
@Gao
I have 1 thing to say
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13150267#comment-13150267
]
gaojinchao commented on HBASE-4739:
---
@Ram
That is a good suggestion, But timeout monitor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13150277#comment-13150277
]
ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-4739:
---
@Gao
if you see my comment
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13150290#comment-13150290
]
gaojinchao commented on HBASE-4739:
---
In fact, I made another patch that is more
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13148272#comment-13148272
]
Ted Yu commented on HBASE-4739:
---
@Jinchao:
Do you want to work out a patch as you outlined @
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13148300#comment-13148300
]
gaojinchao commented on HBASE-4739:
---
Yes, I am trying to reproduce this issue in trunk
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13147458#comment-13147458
]
gaojinchao commented on HBASE-4739:
---
I think it's issue about RS. when RS is closing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13147495#comment-13147495
]
ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-4739:
---
In this scenario what JD
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13147515#comment-13147515
]
gaojinchao commented on HBASE-4739:
---
In 0.90 version, I think there is no this scenario,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13147543#comment-13147543
]
gaojinchao commented on HBASE-4739:
---
It seems HBASE-3789 refactored the code
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13143830#comment-13143830
]
ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-4739:
---
Can we try giving a close
56 matches
Mail list logo
