[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9736) Alow more than one log splitter per RS

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9736?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13830616#comment-13830616 ] stack commented on HBASE-9736: -- Patch seems to work nicely. Is there anything we can do to

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8755) A new write thread model for HLog to improve the overall HBase write throughput

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8755?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13830678#comment-13830678 ] Feng Honghua commented on HBASE-8755: - bq.Do these no longer pass? = yes, under new

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8755) A new write thread model for HLog to improve the overall HBase write throughput

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8755?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13830681#comment-13830681 ] Feng Honghua commented on HBASE-8755: - bq.= yes, under new thread model, no explicit

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-9489) Add cp hooks in online merge before and after setting PONR

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] rajeshbabu updated HBASE-9489: -- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) Add cp hooks in online merge before and after setting PONR

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-9489) Add cp hooks in online merge before and after setting PONR

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] rajeshbabu updated HBASE-9489: -- Attachment: HBASE-9489.patch Patch for trunk. Added hooks all over merge. I will add some more test

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9489) Add cp hooks in online merge before and after setting PONR

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13830697#comment-13830697 ] Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-9489: -- {color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-10015) Major performance improvement: Avoid synchronization in StoreScanner

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10015?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13830719#comment-13830719 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-10015: --- Something like this. On order for the

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-10015) Major performance improvement: Avoid synchronization in StoreScanner

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10015?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13830735#comment-13830735 ] Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-10015: bq. On order for the compaction to make

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9949) Fix the race condition between Compaction and StoreScanner.init

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9949?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13830737#comment-13830737 ] Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-9949: --- ​Shall we revert the HBASE-9949 commit to

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-10015) Major performance improvement: Avoid synchronization in StoreScanner

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10015?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13830739#comment-13830739 ] stack commented on HBASE-10015: --- +1 on committing what is done already. epoch sounds like

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9949) Fix the race condition between Compaction and StoreScanner.init

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9949?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13830741#comment-13830741 ] Ted Yu commented on HBASE-9949: --- The testing bits were taken out through 9949.addendum Fix

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9949) Fix the race condition between Compaction and StoreScanner.init

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9949?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13830742#comment-13830742 ] Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-9949: --- bq. The testing bits were taken out through

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8755) A new write thread model for HLog to improve the overall HBase write throughput

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8755?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13830753#comment-13830753 ] Ted Yu commented on HBASE-8755: --- bq. 2/3 have worse perf, 10 has equal perf but introduces

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8143) HBase on Hadoop 2 with local short circuit reads (ssr) causes OOM

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8143?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13830752#comment-13830752 ] stack commented on HBASE-8143: -- [~enis] Any chance of a revew on this one? I'd like to

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-9992) [hbck] Refactor so that arbitrary -D cmdline options are included

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9992?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-9992: - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: (was: 0.94.14) Hadoop Flags: Reviewed Status:

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8755) A new write thread model for HLog to improve the overall HBase write throughput

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8755?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13830755#comment-13830755 ] stack commented on HBASE-8755: -- bq. Do you remember how many extra threads were introduced ?

[jira] [Resolved] (HBASE-9322) Contention on the SoftValueSortedMap with multiple clients

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9322?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack resolved HBASE-9322. -- Resolution: Won't Fix SoftValueSortedMap was removed by HBASE-9869 so we won't be fixing this one.

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-5945) Reduce buffer copies in IPC server response path

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5945?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-5945: - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.98.0 Hadoop Flags: Reviewed Status: Resolved (was:

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9942) hbase Scanner specifications accepting wrong specifier and then after scan using correct specifier returning unexpected result

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9942?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13830765#comment-13830765 ] stack commented on HBASE-9942: -- [~mbertozzi] I missed your comment above. I just saw it now.

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-10000) Initiate lease recovery for outstanding WAL files at the very beginning of recovery

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13830768#comment-13830768 ] Ted Yu commented on HBASE-1: bq. Make a method of this: The code modifies two local

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9806) Add PerfEval tool for BlockCache

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9806?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13830769#comment-13830769 ] Jean-Marc Spaggiari commented on HBASE-9806: Sure! I might be able to give it

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-10000) Initiate lease recovery for outstanding WAL files at the very beginning of recovery

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ted Yu updated HBASE-1: --- Attachment: 1-v4.txt Initiate lease recovery for outstanding WAL files at the very beginning of

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-10000) Initiate lease recovery for outstanding WAL files at the very beginning of recovery

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ted Yu updated HBASE-1: --- Attachment: (was: 1-v3.txt) Initiate lease recovery for outstanding WAL files at the very

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-10000) Initiate lease recovery for outstanding WAL files at the very beginning of recovery

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ted Yu updated HBASE-1: --- Fix Version/s: 0.98.0 Status: Patch Available (was: Open) Initiate lease recovery for

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-10000) Initiate lease recovery for outstanding WAL files at the very beginning of recovery

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ted Yu updated HBASE-1: --- Attachment: 1-v4.txt Initiate lease recovery for outstanding WAL files at the very beginning of

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-10000) Initiate lease recovery for outstanding WAL files at the very beginning of recovery

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ted Yu updated HBASE-1: --- Attachment: (was: 1-v4.txt) Initiate lease recovery for outstanding WAL files at the very

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9992) [hbck] Refactor so that arbitrary -D cmdline options are included

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9992?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13830782#comment-13830782 ] Hudson commented on HBASE-9992: --- SUCCESS: Integrated in hbase-0.96 #201 (See

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9992) [hbck] Refactor so that arbitrary -D cmdline options are included

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9992?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13830785#comment-13830785 ] Hudson commented on HBASE-9992: --- SUCCESS: Integrated in HBase-TRUNK #4694 (See

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-10015) Major performance improvement: Avoid synchronization in StoreScanner

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10015?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13830786#comment-13830786 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-10015: --- Epoch would be like reference counting per

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-10000) Initiate lease recovery for outstanding WAL files at the very beginning of recovery

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13830793#comment-13830793 ] Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-1: --- {color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-10000) Initiate lease recovery for outstanding WAL files at the very beginning of recovery

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ted Yu updated HBASE-1: --- Attachment: 1-v5.txt I didn't reproduce the failure in

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9939) All HBase client threads are locked out on network failure

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9939?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13830809#comment-13830809 ] Matteo Bertozzi commented on HBASE-9939: This looks similar to HBASE-9050 and

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9992) [hbck] Refactor so that arbitrary -D cmdline options are included

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9992?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13830812#comment-13830812 ] Hudson commented on HBASE-9992: --- SUCCESS: Integrated in hbase-0.96-hadoop2 #129 (See

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-10000) Initiate lease recovery for outstanding WAL files at the very beginning of recovery

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13830822#comment-13830822 ] Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-1: --- {color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9992) [hbck] Refactor so that arbitrary -D cmdline options are included

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9992?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13830821#comment-13830821 ] Hudson commented on HBASE-9992: --- SUCCESS: Integrated in HBase-TRUNK-on-Hadoop-2.0.0 #849

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-10015) Major performance improvement: Avoid synchronization in StoreScanner

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10015?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13830849#comment-13830849 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-10015: --- Actually this is not quite right in 0.94,

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-10000) Initiate lease recovery for outstanding WAL files at the very beginning of recovery

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13830853#comment-13830853 ] stack commented on HBASE-1: --- bq. The code modifies two local variables. Making it a

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-10015) Major performance improvement: Avoid synchronization in StoreScanner

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10015?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13830857#comment-13830857 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-10015: --- No longer sure that patch is good. The

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-10015) Major performance improvement: Avoid synchronization in StoreScanner

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10015?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lars Hofhansl updated HBASE-10015: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 0.94.15) (was: 0.96.1)

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-10000) Initiate lease recovery for outstanding WAL files at the very beginning of recovery

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13830889#comment-13830889 ] Ted Yu commented on HBASE-1: bq. Why do reflection every time this method is called?

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-10000) Initiate lease recovery for outstanding WAL files at the very beginning of recovery

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ted Yu updated HBASE-1: --- Attachment: 1-v6.txt The TestDistributedLogSplitting#testDelayedDeleteOnFailure was looking for