[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20447) Only fail cacheBlock if block collisions aren't related to next block metadata

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20447?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16449162#comment-16449162 ] Zach York commented on HBASE-20447: --- Added a patch incorporating [~apurtell] and [~yuzhih...@gmail.com]

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-19924) hbase rpc throttling does not work for multi() with request count rater.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19924?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16449184#comment-16449184 ] Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-19924: Dang missed this one. Branch-1 could really use this. We

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20447) Only fail cacheBlock if block collisions aren't related to next block metadata

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20447?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16449200#comment-16449200 ] Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-20447: --- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20434) Also remove remote wals when peer is in DA state

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20434?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16449203#comment-16449203 ] Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-20434: --- Talked with [~zghaobac] offline, a better way is always remove the

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-19924) hbase rpc throttling does not work for multi() with request count rater.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19924?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16449213#comment-16449213 ] Josh Elser commented on HBASE-19924: {quote}We could use HBASE-20468 for backport? Unless the patch

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20458) Support removing a WAL from LogRoller

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16449217#comment-16449217 ] Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-20458: --- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20411) Ameliorate MutableSegment synchronize

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20411?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16449303#comment-16449303 ] stack commented on HBASE-20411: --- Post the patch [~huaxiang]. I can give it a run. [~anoop.hbase] has been

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20411) Ameliorate MutableSegment synchronize

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20411?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16449305#comment-16449305 ] Anoop Sam John commented on HBASE-20411: Discussing with Stack offline. - The issue will be

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20456) Support removing a ReplicationSourceShipper for a special wal group

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20456?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16449220#comment-16449220 ] Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-20456: --- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6572) Tiered HFile storage

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6572?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16449230#comment-16449230 ] Yu Li commented on HBASE-6572: -- I see, will add some experimental tag (although actually we have been using

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-20432) Cleanup related resources when remove a sync replication peer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20432?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Zheng Hu updated HBASE-20432: - Attachment: HBASE-20432.HBASE-19064.v3.patch > Cleanup related resources when remove a sync replication

[jira] [Comment Edited] (HBASE-20411) Ameliorate MutableSegment synchronize

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20411?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16449300#comment-16449300 ] huaxiang sun edited comment on HBASE-20411 at 4/24/18 5:17 AM: --- I have a

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20411) Ameliorate MutableSegment synchronize

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20411?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16449300#comment-16449300 ] huaxiang sun commented on HBASE-20411: -- I have a patch ready which uses LongAdder for counters in

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20411) Ameliorate MutableSegment synchronize

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20411?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16449306#comment-16449306 ] Anoop Sam John commented on HBASE-20411: Ya pls put the patch here. If you have an E2E patch, I

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-20458) Support removing a WAL from LogRoller

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Guanghao Zhang updated HBASE-20458: --- Attachment: HBASE-20458.HBASE-19064.006.patch > Support removing a WAL from LogRoller >

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20316) Backport HBASE-20229 "ConnectionImplementation.locateRegions() returns duplicated entries when region replication is on" to branch-1

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16449204#comment-16449204 ] Toshihiro Suzuki commented on HBASE-20316: -- Thank you for reviewing [~huaxiang]. > Backport

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20458) Support removing a WAL from LogRoller

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16449309#comment-16449309 ] Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-20458: --- | (/) *{color:green}+1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote ||

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20468) RPC quota requests ineffective due to not counting multi-actions

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20468?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16448687#comment-16448687 ] Josh Elser commented on HBASE-20468: Primo, thanks, Andrew! > RPC quota requests ineffective due to

[jira] [Work started] (HBASE-20468) RPC quota requests ineffective due to not counting multi-actions

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20468?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Work on HBASE-20468 started by Josh Elser. -- > RPC quota requests ineffective due to not counting multi-actions >

<    1   2