[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-7805) Scan of same region processed serially if table has region observer coprocessor

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7805?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] James Taylor updated HBASE-7805: Attachment: ParallelScanTestCoProc.java ParallelScanTest.java Scan of same

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-7805) Scan of same region processed serially if table has region observer coprocessor

James Taylor created HBASE-7805: --- Summary: Scan of same region processed serially if table has region observer coprocessor Key: HBASE-7805 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7805 Project:

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-7805) Scan of same region processed serially if table has region observer coprocessor

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7805?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13575448#comment-13575448 ] Ted Yu commented on HBASE-7805: --- I got the following compilation error when putting the 2

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-7667) Support stripe compaction

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7667?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13575449#comment-13575449 ] Ted Yu commented on HBASE-7667: --- bq. Sub-region is not a good name either though. Other

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-7806) Isolate the FileSystem calls

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7806?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Matteo Bertozzi updated HBASE-7806: --- Attachment: HBASE-7806.pdf Isolate the FileSystem calls

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-7806) Isolate the FileSystem calls

Matteo Bertozzi created HBASE-7806: -- Summary: Isolate the FileSystem calls Key: HBASE-7806 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7806 Project: HBase Issue Type: Task

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-7807) Introduce HRegionFileSystem and move region fs related code

Matteo Bertozzi created HBASE-7807: -- Summary: Introduce HRegionFileSystem and move region fs related code Key: HBASE-7807 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7807 Project: HBase

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-7807) Introduce HRegionFileSystem and move region fs related code

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7807?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Matteo Bertozzi updated HBASE-7807: --- Attachment: HBASE-7807-v0.patch Introduce HRegionFileSystem and move region fs related

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-7807) Introduce HRegionFileSystem and move region fs related code

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7807?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Matteo Bertozzi updated HBASE-7807: --- Description: Add a new HRegionFileSystem class that allows to create an on-disk region

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-7807) Introduce HRegionFileSystem and move region fs related code

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7807?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Matteo Bertozzi updated HBASE-7807: --- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) Introduce HRegionFileSystem and move region fs

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-7808) Refactor Store to use HRegionFileSystem

Matteo Bertozzi created HBASE-7808: -- Summary: Refactor Store to use HRegionFileSystem Key: HBASE-7808 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7808 Project: HBase Issue Type:

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-7808) Refactor Store to use HRegionFileSystem

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7808?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Matteo Bertozzi updated HBASE-7808: --- Attachment: HBASE-7808-v0.patch Refactor Store to use HRegionFileSystem

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-7809) Refactor Split/Merge to use HRegionFileSystem

Matteo Bertozzi created HBASE-7809: -- Summary: Refactor Split/Merge to use HRegionFileSystem Key: HBASE-7809 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7809 Project: HBase Issue Type:

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-7807) Introduce HRegionFileSystem and move region fs related code

Matteo Bertozzi created HBASE-7807: -- Summary: Introduce HRegionFileSystem and move region fs related code Key: HBASE-7807 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7807 Project: HBase

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-7810) Refactor MasterFileSystem to be inline with HRegionFileSystem philosophy

Matteo Bertozzi created HBASE-7810: -- Summary: Refactor MasterFileSystem to be inline with HRegionFileSystem philosophy Key: HBASE-7810 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7810 Project:

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-7811) Cleanup code to use HRegionFileSystem, remove getDir and fs operations

Matteo Bertozzi created HBASE-7811: -- Summary: Cleanup code to use HRegionFileSystem, remove getDir and fs operations Key: HBASE-7811 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7811 Project:

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-7805) Scan of same region processed serially if table has region observer coprocessor

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7805?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ted Yu updated HBASE-7805: -- Attachment: 7805-trunk.txt Trunk patch that compiles. I couldn't get it to fail. Scan of

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-7805) Scan of same region processed serially if table has region observer coprocessor

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7805?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ted Yu updated HBASE-7805: -- Fix Version/s: 0.96.0 Status: Patch Available (was: Open) Scan of same region processed

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-7805) Scan of same region processed serially if table has region observer coprocessor

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7805?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13575454#comment-13575454 ] Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-7805: -- {color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-7805) Scan of same region processed serially if table has region observer coprocessor

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7805?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ted Yu updated HBASE-7805: -- Attachment: 7805-trunk.txt Scan of same region processed serially if table has region observer

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-7805) Scan of same region processed serially if table has region observer coprocessor

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7805?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ted Yu updated HBASE-7805: -- Attachment: (was: 7805-trunk.txt) Scan of same region processed serially if table has region observer

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-7807) Introduce HRegionFileSystem and move region fs related code

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7807?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13575456#comment-13575456 ] Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-7807: -- {color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-7805) Scan of same region processed serially if table has region observer coprocessor

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7805?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13575464#comment-13575464 ] Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-7805: -- {color:green}+1 overall{color}. Here are the results

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-7805) Scan of same region processed serially if table has region observer coprocessor

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7805?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13575465#comment-13575465 ] James Taylor commented on HBASE-7805: - I had compiled against 94.2 - sorry about that.

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-7805) Scan of same region processed serially if table has region observer coprocessor

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7805?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13575466#comment-13575466 ] Ted Yu commented on HBASE-7805: --- HRegion has the following: {code} class RegionScannerImpl

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-7784) move the code related to compaction selection specific to default compaction policy, into default compaction policy (from HStore)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7784?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ted Yu updated HBASE-7784: -- Resolution: Fixed Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) move the code related to compaction

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-7805) Scan of same region processed serially if table has region observer coprocessor

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7805?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13575480#comment-13575480 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-7805: -- I am happy to claim that my change fixed this

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-7805) Scan of same region processed serially if table has region observer coprocessor

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7805?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lars Hofhansl updated HBASE-7805: - Fix Version/s: (was: 0.94.5) 0.94.6 Scan of same region processed

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-7805) Scan of same region processed serially if table has region observer coprocessor

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7805?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andrew Purtell updated HBASE-7805: -- Attachment: 7805-0.94.patch Patch against 0.94 r1444578 too. Test passes locally over 100

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-7805) Scan of same region processed serially if table has region observer coprocessor

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7805?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13575482#comment-13575482 ] Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-7805: --- Hang on. As soon as I said that something

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-7805) Scan of same region processed serially if table has region observer coprocessor

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7805?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13575485#comment-13575485 ] Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-7805: --- Yes, after introducing some additional load

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-7805) Scan of same region processed serially if table has region observer coprocessor

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7805?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13575488#comment-13575488 ] Ted Yu commented on HBASE-7805: --- Here was runtime statistics from one local run (without

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-7805) Scan of same region processed serially if table has region observer coprocessor

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7805?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13575489#comment-13575489 ] Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-7805: --- {code} // Somewhat arbitrary, but

[jira] [Comment Edited] (HBASE-7805) Scan of same region processed serially if table has region observer coprocessor

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7805?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13575489#comment-13575489 ] Andrew Purtell edited comment on HBASE-7805 at 2/10/13 6:45 PM:

[jira] [Comment Edited] (HBASE-7805) Scan of same region processed serially if table has region observer coprocessor

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7805?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13575489#comment-13575489 ] Andrew Purtell edited comment on HBASE-7805 at 2/10/13 6:47 PM:

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-7805) Scan of same region processed serially if table has region observer coprocessor

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7805?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ted Yu updated HBASE-7805: -- Attachment: 7805-trunk-v2.txt Trunk patch v2 replaces System.out with LOG. Also moved the position of starting

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-7805) Scan of same region processed serially if table has region observer coprocessor

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7805?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13575494#comment-13575494 ] Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-7805: --- With the 0.94 patch adjusted with Ted's v2,

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-7803) Look into REST API performance

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7803?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13575500#comment-13575500 ] Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-7803: --- Have you considered HTTP overheads? YCSB

[jira] [Comment Edited] (HBASE-7803) Look into REST API performance

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7803?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13575500#comment-13575500 ] Andrew Purtell edited comment on HBASE-7803 at 2/10/13 7:22 PM:

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-7805) Scan of same region processed serially if table has region observer coprocessor

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7805?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13575501#comment-13575501 ] Ted Yu commented on HBASE-7805: --- If 0.94 tests output both serial and parallel runtime

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-7803) Look into REST API performance

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7803?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13575503#comment-13575503 ] Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-7803: --- In the above, when considering wide vs

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-7805) Scan of same region processed serially if table has region observer coprocessor

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7805?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13575504#comment-13575504 ] Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-7805: -- {color:green}+1 overall{color}. Here are the results

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-7803) Look into REST API performance

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7803?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13575506#comment-13575506 ] Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-7803: --- I have also profiled the REST interface in

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-7805) Scan of same region processed serially if table has region observer coprocessor

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7805?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13575511#comment-13575511 ] Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-7805: -- {color:green}+1 overall{color}. Here are the results

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-7805) Scan of same region processed serially if table has region observer coprocessor

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7805?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13575518#comment-13575518 ] James Taylor commented on HBASE-7805: - Ted is right - the start time should have been

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-7805) Scan of same region processed serially if table has region observer coprocessor

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7805?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] James Taylor updated HBASE-7805: Priority: Minor (was: Major) Scan of same region processed serially if table has region

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-7805) Scan of same region processed serially if table has region observer coprocessor

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7805?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] James Taylor updated HBASE-7805: Resolution: Invalid Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Scan of same region

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-7805) Scan of same region processed serially if table has region observer coprocessor

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7805?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13575573#comment-13575573 ] Ted Yu commented on HBASE-7805: --- @James: Can you confirm that the labels for 0.94.2

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-7803) Look into REST API performance

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7803?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13575577#comment-13575577 ] Jimmy Xiang commented on HBASE-7803: Yes, each read is a separate HTTP request. I

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-7667) Support stripe compaction

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7667?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13575578#comment-13575578 ] Jimmy Xiang commented on HBASE-7667: Stripes don't have overlapping keyrange with

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-7667) Support stripe compaction

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7667?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13575583#comment-13575583 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-7667: -- I see, then a major compaction needs to at

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-7667) Support stripe compaction

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7667?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13575589#comment-13575589 ] Jimmy Xiang commented on HBASE-7667: That's right. To major compact a stripe, all L0

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-7803) Look into REST API performance

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7803?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13575592#comment-13575592 ] Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-7803: --- Yes 70x indicates something amiss.

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-7805) Scan of same region processed serially if table has region observer coprocessor

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7805?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13575597#comment-13575597 ] James Taylor commented on HBASE-7805: - The coprocessor time will be much faster -

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-7043) Region Server Group CLI commands

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7043?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13575600#comment-13575600 ] Francis Liu commented on HBASE-7043: [~te...@apache.org] I believe it'll automatically

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-7043) Region Server Group CLI commands

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7043?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Francis Liu updated HBASE-7043: --- Attachment: HBASE-7043_94_4.patch addressed ted's comments Region Server Group CLI

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-6721) RegionServer Group based Assignment

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Francis Liu updated HBASE-6721: --- Attachment: HBASE-6721_94_7.patch RegionServer Group based Assignment

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6721) RegionServer Group based Assignment

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13575602#comment-13575602 ] Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-6721: -- {color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-7043) Region Server Group CLI commands

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7043?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13575603#comment-13575603 ] Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-7043: -- {color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-7805) Scan of same region processed serially if table has region observer coprocessor

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7805?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lars Hofhansl updated HBASE-7805: - Fix Version/s: (was: 0.94.6) (was: 0.96.0) Scan of same region

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-7805) Scan of same region processed serially if table has region observer coprocessor

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7805?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13575618#comment-13575618 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-7805: -- If the data is in cache and we have a multi

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-7641) Port HBASE-6669 'Add BigDecimalColumnInterpreter for doing aggregations using AggregationClient' to trunk

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7641?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13575620#comment-13575620 ] Anil Gupta commented on HBASE-7641: --- I started working on porting this to trunk. This is

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-7805) Scan of same region processed serially if table has region observer coprocessor

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7805?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] James Taylor updated HBASE-7805: Attachment: ParallelScanTestCoProc.java ParallelScanTest.java Updated test to move

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-7797) Use consistent package name

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7797?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13575622#comment-13575622 ] Enis Soztutar commented on HBASE-7797: -- I can see the intention, but Cell is a small

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-7761) MemStore.USEMSLAB_DEFAULT is false, hbase-default.xml says it's true

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7761?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anoop Sam John updated HBASE-7761: -- Fix Version/s: 0.94.6 0.96.0 MemStore.USEMSLAB_DEFAULT is false,