[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22835?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16905176#comment-16905176
]
Jeongmin Kim edited comment on HBASE-22835 at 8/13/19 5:38 AM:
---
patch v2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22835?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16905845#comment-16905845
]
HBase QA commented on HBASE-22835:
--
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22836?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16905832#comment-16905832
]
HBase QA commented on HBASE-22836:
--
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem
Apache-HBase commented on issue #343: HBASE-22634 : Improve performance of
BufferedMutator
URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/343#issuecomment-520691515
:confetti_ball: **+1 overall**
| Vote | Subsystem | Runtime | Comment |
huonw opened a new pull request #483: HBASE-22841 Add more factory functions to
TimeRange
URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/483
These functions make it easier to possible to use
`org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.Table.CheckAndMutateBuilder#timeRange`
with more interesting
Huon Wilson created HBASE-22841:
---
Summary: TimeRange's factory functions do not support ranges, only
`allTime` and `at`
Key: HBASE-22841
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22841
Project:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22836?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Zhao updated HBASE-22836:
-
Attachment: HBASE-22836.branch-1.0001.patch
> MemcachedBlockCache parameter error
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22836?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Zhao updated HBASE-22836:
-
Attachment: (was: HBASE-22836.branch1.0001.patch)
> MemcachedBlockCache parameter error
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22699?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16905812#comment-16905812
]
Hudson commented on HBASE-22699:
Results for branch branch-2.1
[build #1477 on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22836?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16905811#comment-16905811
]
Zhao commented on HBASE-22836:
--
Hi, [~xucang], I have submitted a patch.
> MemcachedBlockCache parameter
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22836?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16905810#comment-16905810
]
HBase QA commented on HBASE-22836:
--
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22836?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Zhao updated HBASE-22836:
-
Attachment: HBASE-22836.branch1.0001.patch
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
> MemcachedBlockCache
saintstack commented on issue #480: HBASE-22838 : assembly plugin should use
posix
URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/480#issuecomment-520685018
Oh, if you make the change, does assembly still work?
This is an
Apache-HBase commented on issue #477: HBASE-22834 Removed deprecated methods
from HBaseTestingUtility
URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/477#issuecomment-520684605
:broken_heart: **-1 overall**
| Vote | Subsystem | Runtime | Comment |
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22840?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack updated HBASE-22840:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Hadoop Flags: Reviewed
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
Resolving
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22840?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16905795#comment-16905795
]
stack commented on HBASE-22840:
---
I pushed on branch-2.0 and on branch-2.1. I pushed because want to build
sunhelly opened a new pull request #482: HBASE-22820 Do not need to persist
default rs group now
URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/482
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
sunhelly closed pull request #481: HBASE-22820 Do not need to persist default
rs group now
URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/481
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message,
sunhelly opened a new pull request #481: HBASE-22820 Do not need to persist
default rs group now
URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/481
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22813?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16905779#comment-16905779
]
Xiaolin Ha commented on HBASE-22813:
Yes. But what I think is, if a user set meta to a group other
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22839?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16905775#comment-16905775
]
Bin Shi edited comment on HBASE-22839 at 8/13/19 3:29 AM:
--
[~apurtell] and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22839?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16905775#comment-16905775
]
Bin Shi commented on HBASE-22839:
-
[~apurtell] and [~openinx], I might overlook one thing – besides
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22813?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16905769#comment-16905769
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-22813:
---
When bootstraping this is true, but if meta is already online I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20952?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16905768#comment-16905768
]
Hudson commented on HBASE-20952:
Results for branch HBASE-20952
[build #102 on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22839?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16905762#comment-16905762
]
Bin Shi commented on HBASE-22839:
-
[~openinx], thanks for quick response. Yes, -HBASE-20481- contains
Reidd commented on issue #460: HBASE-22774 [WAL] RegionGroupingStrategy
loses its function after split
URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/460#issuecomment-520669313
2nd commit addressed comments only, failed tests are not related.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22813?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16905759#comment-16905759
]
Xiaolin Ha commented on HBASE-22813:
I found on HBASE-22514, when master starting up, meta table
openinx commented on a change in pull request #480: HBASE-22838 : assembly
plugin should use posix
URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/480#discussion_r313202436
##
File path: hbase-assembly/pom.xml
##
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@
hbase-${project.version}
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22835?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jeongmin Kim updated HBASE-22835:
-
Attachment: HBASE-22835.v2.branch-1.3.patch
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22835?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jeongmin Kim updated HBASE-22835:
-
Status: Open (was: Patch Available)
> Scan/Get with setColumn and the store with ROWCOL bloom
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16905754#comment-16905754
]
Zheng Hu commented on HBASE-22837:
--
+1
> Move "Custom WAL Directory" section from "Bulk Loading" to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22839?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16905752#comment-16905752
]
Zheng Hu commented on HBASE-22839:
--
[~Bin Shi] Thanks for pinging me. Yeah, the serial replication in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Zheng Hu updated HBASE-22380:
-
Fix Version/s: 1.4.11
2.1.6
2.2.1
2.0.6
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Zheng Hu updated HBASE-22380:
-
Affects Version/s: 2.3.0
1.5.0
3.0.0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Zheng Hu updated HBASE-22380:
-
Priority: Blocker (was: Critical)
> break circle replication when doing bulkload
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Zheng Hu reassigned HBASE-22380:
Assignee: Zheng Hu
> break circle replication when doing bulkload
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16905740#comment-16905740
]
Zheng Hu commented on HBASE-22380:
--
Yeah, I think still need to attach the cluster id for bulkload...
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22833?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16905738#comment-16905738
]
Zheng Hu commented on HBASE-22833:
--
bq. Could you tell me if my understanding contains something
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22699?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16905728#comment-16905728
]
Hudson commented on HBASE-22699:
Results for branch branch-2
[build #2163 on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22631?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16905726#comment-16905726
]
yuhuiyang edited comment on HBASE-22631 at 8/13/19 1:56 AM:
[~wchevreuil]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22833?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16905727#comment-16905727
]
Zheng Hu commented on HBASE-22833:
--
OK, I misunderstood the MultiRowRangeFilter as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22631?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16905726#comment-16905726
]
yuhuiyang commented on HBASE-22631:
---
[~wchevreuil] Thanks for your attention .I think it is different
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22840?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16905722#comment-16905722
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-22840:
---
Ping [~stack], I think we should include this in 2.0.6?
> Fix
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22840?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16905720#comment-16905720
]
HBase QA commented on HBASE-22840:
--
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22840?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-22840:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.1.7)
2.1.6
> Fix backport of HBASE-21325
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22840?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-22840:
--
Fix Version/s: 2.0.6
> Fix backport of HBASE-21325
> ---
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22840?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ankit Singhal updated HBASE-22840:
--
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
> Fix backport of HBASE-21325
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22840?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16905718#comment-16905718
]
Ankit Singhal commented on HBASE-22840:
---
FYI [~elserj]
> Fix backport of HBASE-21325
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22840?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ankit Singhal updated HBASE-22840:
--
Attachment: HBASE-22840.patch
> Fix backport of HBASE-21325
> ---
>
>
Ankit Singhal created HBASE-22840:
-
Summary: Fix backport of HBASE-21325
Key: HBASE-22840
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22840
Project: HBase
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22819?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16905714#comment-16905714
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-22819:
---
We plan to store the rs group information in the table
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22699?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16905712#comment-16905712
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-22699:
---
Thanks [~stack]. Yes, on master we have purged bunch of the old
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22825?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16905711#comment-16905711
]
Sakthi commented on HBASE-22825:
Waiting for the 2.1.6 release for the fixMeta to be available for usage
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22823?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Caroline reassigned HBASE-22823:
Assignee: Caroline
> Mark Canary as Public/Evolving
> --
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22804?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Caroline updated HBASE-22804:
-
Attachment: HBASE-22804.master.002.patch
> Provide an API to get list of successful regions and total
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22839?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16905699#comment-16905699
]
Bin Shi commented on HBASE-22839:
-
[~apurtell], thanks for the input. I'll prepare a PR for the minimal
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22699?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16905693#comment-16905693
]
Hudson commented on HBASE-22699:
Results for branch branch-2.2
[build #510 on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22839?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16905691#comment-16905691
]
Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-22839:
Another consideration is there is a high bar for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22839?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Purtell reassigned HBASE-22839:
--
Assignee: Bin Shi
> Make sure the batches within one region are shipped to the sink
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22839?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Purtell updated HBASE-22839:
---
Summary: Make sure the batches within one region are shipped to the sink
clusters in order
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22839?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Purtell updated HBASE-22839:
---
Description:
Problem Statement:
In the cross-cluster replication validation, we found some
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22839?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16905688#comment-16905688
]
Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-22839:
Thanks [~xucang]
I would like to get a 1.5.0 candidate
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22839?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Purtell updated HBASE-22839:
---
Summary: Make sure the batches within one region are shipped to the slave
clusters in order
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22839?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Purtell updated HBASE-22839:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.3.5)
(was: 1.3.4)
1.5.0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21745?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16905687#comment-16905687
]
Guanghao Zhang commented on HBASE-21745:
bq. Ok. Lets see how we do. I think adoption service is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15867?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16905686#comment-16905686
]
Xu Cang commented on HBASE-15867:
-
Since this Jira is blocked by a [dead loop
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22804?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16905685#comment-16905685
]
HBase QA commented on HBASE-22804:
--
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20166?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16905680#comment-16905680
]
Xu Cang commented on HBASE-20166:
-
>From high level, this difficulty sounds like HBase needs an external
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22699?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16905674#comment-16905674
]
Hudson commented on HBASE-22699:
Results for branch branch-2.0
[build #1857 on
Apache-HBase commented on issue #479: HBASE-22802 Avoid temp ByteBuffer
allocation in FileIOEngine#read
URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/479#issuecomment-520631413
:broken_heart: **-1 overall**
| Vote | Subsystem | Runtime | Comment |
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22819?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16905669#comment-16905669
]
Xu Cang commented on HBASE-22819:
-
Could you elaborate this issue a bit more? thanks [~Apache9]
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22695?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16905660#comment-16905660
]
Xu Cang commented on HBASE-22695:
-
I am late for the discussion, but still would love to know, what's
Apache-HBase commented on issue #456: HBASE-22631 assign failed may make gced
parent region appear again
URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/456#issuecomment-520623855
:confetti_ball: **+1 overall**
| Vote | Subsystem | Runtime | Comment |
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22839?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bin Shi updated HBASE-22839:
Description:
Problem Statement:
In the cross-cluster replication validation, we found some cells in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22839?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bin Shi updated HBASE-22839:
Description:
Problem Statement:
In the cross-cluster replication validation, we found some cells in
xcangCRM commented on issue #468: HBASE-22822 : Un/Re-schedule balancer chore
with balance_switch
URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/468#issuecomment-520622989
Notice there are lots tests failed. Have you already confirmed that they are
all irrelevant to this change? thanks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22839?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bin Shi updated HBASE-22839:
Description:
Problem Statement:
In the cross-cluster replication validation, we found some cells in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22839?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bin Shi updated HBASE-22839:
Description:
Problem Statement:
In the cross-cluster replication validation, we found some cells in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22839?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bin Shi updated HBASE-22839:
Description:
Problem Statement:
In the cross-cluster replication validation, we found some cells in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22839?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16905603#comment-16905603
]
Bin Shi edited comment on HBASE-22839 at 8/12/19 10:38 PM:
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22823?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16905647#comment-16905647
]
Xu Cang commented on HBASE-22823:
-
I agree with this proposal and I don't see any practical downside
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22836?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16905645#comment-16905645
]
Xu Cang commented on HBASE-22836:
-
So, if I understand you correctly, you meant,
{code:java}
public int
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16905639#comment-16905639
]
Xu Cang commented on HBASE-22837:
-
+1
> Move "Custom WAL Directory" section from "Bulk Loading" to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22839?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16905626#comment-16905626
]
Bin Shi commented on HBASE-22839:
-
[~xucang], thanks for the information. I'll track the work on 1.5.0.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22775?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16905623#comment-16905623
]
HBase QA commented on HBASE-22775:
--
| (/) *{color:green}+1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22839?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16905612#comment-16905612
]
Xu Cang commented on HBASE-22839:
-
FYI, keep in mind that there is a discussion about "Considering
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22839?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16905603#comment-16905603
]
Bin Shi commented on HBASE-22839:
-
[~andrew.purt...@gmail.com], [~lhofhansl], [~divesh.jain],
Bin Shi created HBASE-22839:
---
Summary: Provide Serial Replication in HBase 1.3 to fix "row keys
and timestamps are the same but the values are different in the presence of
cross-cluster replication"
Key: HBASE-22839
Apache-HBase commented on issue #480: HBASE-22838 : assembly plugin should use
posix
URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/480#issuecomment-520597151
:confetti_ball: **+1 overall**
| Vote | Subsystem | Runtime | Comment |
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22775?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Xu Cang updated HBASE-22775:
Attachment: HBASE-22775.master.002.patch
> Enhance logging for peer related operations
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22775?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16905567#comment-16905567
]
Xu Cang edited comment on HBASE-22775 at 8/12/19 8:54 PM:
--
So,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22775?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16905567#comment-16905567
]
Xu Cang commented on HBASE-22775:
-
So, ZKReplicationPeerStorage extends _ZKReplicationStorageBase_ and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22838?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Viraj Jasani updated HBASE-22838:
-
Affects Version/s: (was: 1.5.0)
> assembly:single failure: user id or group id 'x' is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22838?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Viraj Jasani updated HBASE-22838:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.5.0)
> assembly:single failure: user id or group id 'x' is too
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16905558#comment-16905558
]
Sakthi commented on HBASE-21892:
[~elserj] ping.
> If a new table is created inside a namespace then
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22838?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Viraj Jasani updated HBASE-22838:
-
Description:
tarball build with assembly:single command fails with user id(mac) or group
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22838?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Work on HBASE-22838 started by Viraj Jasani.
> assembly:single failure: user id or group id 'x' is too big
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22838?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Viraj Jasani updated HBASE-22838:
-
Fix Version/s: 2.3.0
1.5.0
3.0.0
Status: Patch
virajjasani opened a new pull request #480: HBASE-22838 : assembly plugin
should use posix
URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/480
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message,
Viraj Jasani created HBASE-22838:
Summary: assembly:single failure: user id or group id 'x' is
too big
Key: HBASE-22838
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22838
Project: HBase
1 - 100 of 213 matches
Mail list logo
