[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13532249#comment-13532249
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-7350:
Huh? It needs to be committed to be tested.
As everybody
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
nkeywal updated HBASE-7350:
---
Status: Open (was: Patch Available)
Flakey tests make CI unreliable
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
nkeywal updated HBASE-7350:
---
Attachment: dummy.patch
Flakey tests make CI unreliable
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
nkeywal updated HBASE-7350:
---
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
Flakey tests make CI unreliable
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
nkeywal updated HBASE-7350:
---
Attachment: dummy.patch
Flakey tests make CI unreliable
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
nkeywal updated HBASE-7350:
---
Status: Open (was: Patch Available)
Flakey tests make CI unreliable
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
nkeywal updated HBASE-7350:
---
Attachment: dummy.patch
Flakey tests make CI unreliable
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
nkeywal updated HBASE-7350:
---
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
Flakey tests make CI unreliable
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13532451#comment-13532451
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-7350:
It seems to work:
There are 2 zombie tests, they should
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13532456#comment-13532456
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-7350:
When you run all tests, the default is 5 (profile in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7349?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13532462#comment-13532462
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-7349:
Great :-) there are 100 warnings, if I'm not wrong. 50
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7349?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13532516#comment-13532516
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-7349:
ok ok
then I volunteer for hbase-server, packages from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7349?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13532702#comment-13532702
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-7349:
Ok, so I will do the ones I mentioned... But tomorrow now
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7211?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13531017#comment-13531017
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-7211:
Committed. Thanks, Jeffrey!
I removed as well a reference
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13531323#comment-13531323
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-7268:
Something that could be done here is to give back to the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7334?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13529844#comment-13529844
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-7334:
Is there a security impact if we keep the password in a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7211?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13529986#comment-13529986
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-7211:
I will commit Jeffrey's patch tomorrow if there is no
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7327?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13530313#comment-13530313
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-7327:
I've got some doubts on TestMasterFailover.
The way the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13528808#comment-13528808
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-7271:
Thanks for the reviews. Resolving...
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
nkeywal updated HBASE-7271:
---
Resolution: Fixed
Hadoop Flags: Reviewed
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
Have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7243?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13528851#comment-13528851
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-7243:
Yep, 1 region server should be fast enough.
I think you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13528965#comment-13528965
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-6970:
Doing things completely is actually far from simple...
-
nkeywal created HBASE-7327:
--
Summary: Assignment Timeouts: Remove the code from the master
Key: HBASE-7327
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7327
Project: HBase
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7327?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13529177#comment-13529177
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-7327:
v1 contains what we should be able to remove.
It breaks a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7327?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
nkeywal updated HBASE-7327:
---
Attachment: 7327.v1.uncomplete.patch
Assignment Timeouts: Remove the code from the master
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13529330#comment-13529330
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4709:
Yes, the file 4709.v2.patch is committed to trunk, so the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13527806#comment-13527806
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4709:
V2 committed.
Hadoop metrics2 setup in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13527888#comment-13527888
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-7271:
Committed v3, I will amend (or revert :-) ) if it's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7247?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13527893#comment-13527893
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-7247:
From the comments on the mailing list and here:
- it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
nkeywal updated HBASE-4709:
---
Attachment: 4709.v2.patch
Hadoop metrics2 setup in test MiniDFSClusters spewing JMX errors
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
nkeywal updated HBASE-4709:
---
Status: Open (was: Patch Available)
Hadoop metrics2 setup in test MiniDFSClusters spewing JMX errors
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
nkeywal updated HBASE-4709:
---
Attachment: 4709.v2.patch
Hadoop metrics2 setup in test MiniDFSClusters spewing JMX errors
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
nkeywal updated HBASE-4709:
---
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
Hadoop metrics2 setup in test MiniDFSClusters spewing JMX errors
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
nkeywal updated HBASE-4709:
---
Affects Version/s: 0.96.0
Hadoop metrics2 setup in test MiniDFSClusters spewing JMX errors
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13526399#comment-13526399
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4709:
I've done the log4j HBaseTestingUtility in v2. Note sure
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
nkeywal updated HBASE-7269:
---
Assignee: nkeywal
Testing in place does not work if not building with default profile
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
nkeywal resolved HBASE-7269.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.96.0
Hadoop Flags: Reviewed
Testing in place does not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
nkeywal updated HBASE-7271:
---
Status: Open (was: Patch Available)
Have a single executor for all zkWorkers in the assignment manager
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
nkeywal updated HBASE-7271:
---
Attachment: 7271.v3.patch
Have a single executor for all zkWorkers in the assignment manager
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13526454#comment-13526454
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-7271:
v3. Testing locally.
All comments above taken into
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
nkeywal updated HBASE-7271:
---
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
Have a single executor for all zkWorkers in the assignment manager
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7295?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13526613#comment-13526613
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-7295:
Just a question: what's expected if we have a failure of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13526671#comment-13526671
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-7271:
We've got two lists, hence two locks: we keep the lock on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13511512#comment-13511512
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-7269:
I suppose it's quite old, and doing it in the script
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
nkeywal updated HBASE-7271:
---
Attachment: 7271.v2.patch
Have a single executor for all zkWorkers in the assignment manager
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
nkeywal updated HBASE-7271:
---
Status: Open (was: Patch Available)
Have a single executor for all zkWorkers in the assignment manager
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
nkeywal updated HBASE-7271:
---
Attachment: 7271.v2.patch
Have a single executor for all zkWorkers in the assignment manager
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
nkeywal updated HBASE-7271:
---
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
Have a single executor for all zkWorkers in the assignment manager
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13511559#comment-13511559
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-7271:
v2, with all comments taken into accounts. I fixed two
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7247?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13510363#comment-13510363
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-7247:
I will fix it with the other stuff so. Currently my patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7247?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13510389#comment-13510389
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-7247:
The issue comes from mixing asynchronous writes with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7247?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
nkeywal updated HBASE-7247:
---
Fix Version/s: 0.96.0
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
Assignment performances decreased
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7247?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
nkeywal updated HBASE-7247:
---
Attachment: 7247.v1.patch
Assignment performances decreased by 50% because of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7247?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13510452#comment-13510452
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-7247:
The patch is getting thinner and thinner...
Now I just
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
nkeywal updated HBASE-7269:
---
Attachment: 7269.v1.patch
Testing in place does not work if not building with default profile
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13510483#comment-13510483
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-7269:
What do you think of the patch? It's the implementation
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
nkeywal resolved HBASE-6401.
Resolution: Won't Fix
HDFS 1.1.x includes the fix.
HBase may lose edits after a crash if
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4955?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13510559#comment-13510559
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4955:
Retested 3 times again on trunk, these errors are always
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4955?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13510572#comment-13510572
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4955:
I've got 2 to 5 failures, but these two are always in the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7247?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13510697#comment-13510697
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-7247:
bq. On the 'post_region_open', IIRC, a bunch of these
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13510703#comment-13510703
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-7271:
I'm ok will all the comments, I will provide an updated
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13509577#comment-13509577
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-7269:
I've added the possibility to have options to the mvn
nkeywal created HBASE-7271:
--
Summary: Have a single executor for all zkWorkers in the
assignment manager
Key: HBASE-7271
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7271
Project: HBase
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7247?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13509789#comment-13509789
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-7247:
bq. Do we not have this currently? If someone else
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7247?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13509789#comment-13509789
]
nkeywal edited comment on HBASE-7247 at 12/4/12 3:27 PM:
-
bq. Do
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
nkeywal updated HBASE-7271:
---
Attachment: 7271.v1.patch
Have a single executor for all zkWorkers in the assignment manager
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
nkeywal updated HBASE-7271:
---
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
Have a single executor for all zkWorkers in the assignment manager
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7247?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13509968#comment-13509968
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-7247:
I'm a little bit scared with the watchers: I would not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13509977#comment-13509977
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-7268:
I think this is for 0.96 only: there is an heuristic when
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7247?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13508916#comment-13508916
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-7247:
An possible solution could be:
- use a watcher to see if
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13508922#comment-13508922
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-7219:
I'm putting this on my low priority todo list. I will
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6058?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13508963#comment-13508963
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-6058:
I've tested ZK#multi on assignment in master: no real
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13507242#comment-13507242
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-7219:
When it was discussed on the mailing list, I was thinking
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5877?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13507245#comment-13507245
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-5877:
@jd Yep, you're right.
When a query
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13507250#comment-13507250
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-7213:
To me, there are some stuff that are nice to have in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7243?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13507251#comment-13507251
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-7243:
+1. You don't mention it, but it should be be an
nkeywal created HBASE-7246:
--
Summary: Assignment#nodeChildrenChanged calls
listChildrenAndWatchForNewChildren, overloading master zookeper needlessly
Key: HBASE-7246
URL:
nkeywal created HBASE-7247:
--
Summary: Assignment performances decreased by 50% because of
regionserver.OpenRegionHandler#tickleOpening
Key: HBASE-7247
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7247
nkeywal created HBASE-7248:
--
Summary: Improve the resources usage in assignement
Key: HBASE-7248
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7248
Project: HBase
Issue Type: Improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7247?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13507570#comment-13507570
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-7247:
For the regionserver side, the callback won't be very
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13505367#comment-13505367
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4709:
Sorry for the delay, I haven't seen the comments.
nkeywal created HBASE-7227:
--
Summary: KeyLocker#acquireLocks should be synchronized
Key: HBASE-7227
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7227
Project: HBase
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
nkeywal resolved HBASE-7227.
Resolution: Invalid
more or less invalid actually, as no one else takes two locks in a row (at
least it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13505822#comment-13505822
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-7220:
Thanks, I will try locally as well
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13505868#comment-13505868
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-7220:
Tested locally, as fast as the version without any
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13505882#comment-13505882
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4709:
Ok, then we could also put them in the default log4j
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13504448#comment-13504448
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-7220:
Thanks Elliott!
HRegionobjects are created also in the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7168?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13504932#comment-13504932
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-7168:
I'm ok with that as well. Who's committing it?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5843?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13504937#comment-13504937
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-5843:
Some more tests: ther
scenario: 2 RS. Create a table
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13505254#comment-13505254
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-7213:
Is it something forbidden? Because there is a (fixed)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
nkeywal updated HBASE-6970:
---
Assignee: nkeywal
hbase-deamon.sh creates/updates pid file even when that start failed.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13503690#comment-13503690
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-6970:
I plan to work on it this week.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
nkeywal updated HBASE-4709:
---
Attachment: 4709_workaround.v1.patch
Hadoop metrics2 setup in test MiniDFSClusters spewing JMX errors
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
nkeywal updated HBASE-4709:
---
Fix Version/s: 0.96.0
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
A workaround, proposed on the mailing
nkeywal created HBASE-7220:
--
Summary: Creating a table with 3000 regions on 2 nodes fails after
1 hour
Key: HBASE-7220
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7220
Project: HBase
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7168?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13502798#comment-13502798
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-7168:
Committed, thanks for the review, Elliott Stack!
Note:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7168?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
nkeywal resolved HBASE-7168.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.96.0
Hadoop Flags: Reviewed
[dev] in the script called
nkeywal created HBASE-7211:
--
Summary: Improve hbase ref guide for the testing part.
Key: HBASE-7211
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7211
Project: HBase
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6774?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13502845#comment-13502845
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-6774:
For the master based solution
If we go for the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5843?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13501838#comment-13501838
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-5843:
New scenario on datanode issue during a WAL write:
501 - 600 of 1240 matches
Mail list logo