[jira] [Created] (HBASE-5664) CP hooks in Scan flow for fast forward when filter filters out a row

2012-03-28 Thread Anoop Sam John (Created) (JIRA)
CP hooks in Scan flow for fast forward when filter filters out a row


 Key: HBASE-5664
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5664
 Project: HBase
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: coprocessors
Affects Versions: 0.92.1
Reporter: Anoop Sam John
 Fix For: 0.96.0


In HRegion.nextInternal(int limit, String metric)
We have while(true) loop so as to fetch a next result which satisfies 
filter condition. When Filter filters out the current fetched row we call 
nextRow(byte [] currentRow) before going with the next row.
{code}  
if (results.isEmpty() || filterRow()) {
// this seems like a redundant step - we already consumed the row
// there're no left overs.
// the reasons for calling this method are:
// 1. reset the filters.
// 2. provide a hook to fast forward the row (used by subclasses)
nextRow(currentRow);
{code}
// 2. provide a hook to fast forward the row (used by subclasses)
We can provide same feature of fast forward support for the CP also.


--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Created] (HBASE-5517) Region Server Coprocessor : Suggestion for change when next() call with nbRows1

2012-03-03 Thread Anoop Sam John (Created) (JIRA)
Region Server Coprocessor : Suggestion for change when next() call with nbRows1


 Key: HBASE-5517
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5517
 Project: HBase
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: coprocessors
Affects Versions: 0.92.0
Reporter: Anoop Sam John


Originated from the discussion under HBASE-2038 [Coprocessor based IHBase]

Currently preNext() and postNext() will be called once for a next() call into 
HRegionServer.
But if the next() is being called with nbRows1, co processor should provide a 
chance to do some operation before, after every next() calls into region as 
part of call next(int scannerId, int nbRows).

In case of usage of coprocessor with IHBase, before making any calls of next() 
into a Region, we need to make a reseek() to a row based on the index 
information.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Created] (HBASE-5510) Change in LB.randomAssignment(ListServerName servers) API

2012-03-02 Thread Anoop Sam John (Created) (JIRA)
Change in LB.randomAssignment(ListServerName servers) API
---

 Key: HBASE-5510
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5510
 Project: HBase
  Issue Type: Improvement
Affects Versions: 0.92.0
Reporter: Anoop Sam John


 In LB there is randomAssignment(ListServerName servers) API which will be 
used by AM to assign
 a region from a down RS. [This will be also used in other cases like call to 
assign() API from client]
 I feel it would be better to pass the HRegionInfo also into this method. When 
the LB making a choice for a region
 assignment, when one RS is down, it would be nice that the LB knows for which 
region it is doing this server selection.

+Scenario+
 While one RS down, we wanted the regions to get moved to other RSs but a set 
of regions stay together. We are having custom load balancer but with the 
current way of LB interface this is not possible. Another way is I can allow a 
random assignment of the regions at the RS down time. Later with a cluster 
balance I can balance the regions as I need. But this might make regions assign 
1st to one RS and then again move to another. Also for some time period my 
business use case can not get satisfied.

Also I have seen some issue in JIRA which speaks about making sure that Root 
and META regions always sit in some specific RSs. With the current LB API this 
wont be possible in future.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira