[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6528?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13454784#comment-13454784
]
ShiXing commented on HBASE-6528:
[~lhofhansl] this test case was introduced when I fix
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6589?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13437680#comment-13437680
]
ShiXing commented on HBASE-6589:
It is when I try to invoke the CP. Because the
ShiXing created HBASE-6589:
--
Summary: RegionServer can't load class for dynamically loaded
coprocessors with self defined class
Key: HBASE-6589
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6589
Project:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6520?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ShiXing updated HBASE-6520:
---
Attachment: HBASE-6520-0.94-v1.patch
patch for 0.94
MSLab May cause the Bytes.toLong not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6520?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ShiXing updated HBASE-6520:
---
Attachment: HBASE-6520-trunk-v1.patch
MSLab May cause the Bytes.toLong does not work correctly for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6520?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13430418#comment-13430418
]
ShiXing commented on HBASE-6520:
bq. -1 core tests. The patch failed these unit tests:
ShiXing created HBASE-6528:
--
Summary: Raise the wait time for
TestSplitLogWorker#testAcquireTaskAtStartup to reduce the failure probability
Key: HBASE-6528
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6528
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6528?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ShiXing updated HBASE-6528:
---
Attachment: HBASE-6528-trunk-v1.patch
Raise the wait time for
ShiXing created HBASE-6520:
--
Summary: MSLab May cause the Bytes.toLong does not work correctly
for increment
Key: HBASE-6520
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6520
Project: HBase
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ShiXing updated HBASE-3725:
---
Attachment: HBASE-3725-0.92-V6.patch
toTed
bq. TestHRegion#testIncrementWithFlushAndDelete passed without
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13418892#comment-13418892
]
ShiXing commented on HBASE-3725:
@Ted
bq. I generate a region with 3 store files. The
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13418933#comment-13418933
]
ShiXing commented on HBASE-3725:
@Ted, the reassignment is because there is no interface
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6327?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13417989#comment-13417989
]
ShiXing commented on HBASE-6327:
@Ted, what is this issue's progress now? Can we commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ShiXing updated HBASE-3725:
---
Attachment: HBASE-3725-0.92-V5.patch
@stack, I generate a region with 3 store files. The increment slows
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13418032#comment-13418032
]
ShiXing commented on HBASE-3725:
In V5, if the increment does not got the data it will got
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6327?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13418037#comment-13418037
]
ShiXing commented on HBASE-6327:
In deed, when create table, the hlog is no use
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6370?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ShiXing updated HBASE-6370:
---
Attachment: HBASE-6370-trunk-V2.patch
Yes, I think the configuration is more acceptable for heterogeneous
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6370?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ShiXing updated HBASE-6370:
---
Attachment: runAllTests.out
The v3 looks nice, runAllTests passed on my server.
Add
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6370?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ShiXing updated HBASE-6370:
---
Summary: Add compression codec test at HMaster when
createTable/modifyColumn/modifyTable (was: Add
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6370?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ShiXing updated HBASE-6370:
---
Attachment: HBASE-6370-trunk-V1.patch
Use the already exists unit test through the HBaseAdmin's.
ShiXing created HBASE-6370:
--
Summary: Add compression codec test at HMaster when create table
Key: HBASE-6370
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6370
Project: HBase
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13409205#comment-13409205
]
ShiXing commented on HBASE-3725:
The trunk does not have this bug, for the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13409213#comment-13409213
]
ShiXing commented on HBASE-3725:
Mean the performance is important than the correctness?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ShiXing updated HBASE-3725:
---
Attachment: HBASE-3725-0.92-V4.patch
pls review it.
HBase increments from old value after
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13406928#comment-13406928
]
ShiXing commented on HBASE-3725:
bq.Is this a fix for 0.92 only ShiXing?
yes
bq.Doing a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13406929#comment-13406929
]
ShiXing commented on HBASE-3725:
bq. But the correctness is affected.
I mean the 0.92
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6327?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13406948#comment-13406948
]
ShiXing commented on HBASE-6327:
@Ted
Not yet, I have commit this patch into our code,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6327?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13407687#comment-13407687
]
ShiXing commented on HBASE-6327:
TestServerCustomProtocol passed locally for me.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6327?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13407688#comment-13407688
]
ShiXing commented on HBASE-6327:
Maybe the thread leak is normal, because the
ShiXing created HBASE-6327:
--
Summary: HLog can be null when create table
Key: HBASE-6327
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6327
Project: HBase
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6327?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ShiXing updated HBASE-6327:
---
Attachment: createTableFailedMaster.log
HLog can be null when create table
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6327?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ShiXing updated HBASE-6327:
---
Description:
As HBASE-4010 discussed, the HLog can be null.
We have meet createTable failed because the no
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6327?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ShiXing updated HBASE-6327:
---
Attachment: HBASE-6327-trunk-V1.patch
The trunk code of the HLog.sync() use group sync, the interruption as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13404667#comment-13404667
]
ShiXing commented on HBASE-6292:
@Andrew, I see the ACL Matrix in HBASE-6192
{code}
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ShiXing updated HBASE-3725:
---
Attachment: HBASE-3725-0.92-V3.patch
If the Delete and next Increment occured the same millionsecond, the
ShiXing created HBASE-6292:
--
Summary: Compact can skip the security access control
Key: HBASE-6292
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6292
Project: HBase
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6195?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13403811#comment-13403811
]
ShiXing commented on HBASE-6195:
yes, I think so.
Increment data will be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ShiXing updated HBASE-6292:
---
Attachment: HBASE-6292-trunk-V1.patch
Patch for trunk
If this patch can be commited, then the patches for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13403165#comment-13403165
]
ShiXing commented on HBASE-3725:
Is there any progress?
HBase increments
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13403170#comment-13403170
]
ShiXing commented on HBASE-3725:
Sorry for mistake of Ctrl+Enter.
I think the fixup could
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ShiXing updated HBASE-3725:
---
Attachment: HBASE-3725-0.92-V1.patch
remove the getLastIncrement function.
HBase
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ShiXing updated HBASE-6269:
---
Attachment: runAllTests.out.txt
I run
mvn test -P runAllTests
and the output is in the runAllTests.out.txt
ShiXing created HBASE-6269:
--
Summary: Lazyseek should use the maxSequenseId StoreFile's
KeyValue as the latest KeyValue
Key: HBASE-6269
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6269
Project: HBase
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ShiXing updated HBASE-6269:
---
Attachment: HBASE-6269-v1.patch
Lazyseek should use the maxSequenseId StoreFile's KeyValue as the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6195?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13401267#comment-13401267
]
ShiXing commented on HBASE-6195:
I find that the problem is introduced by the lazyseek. I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13401383#comment-13401383
]
ShiXing commented on HBASE-6269:
@anoop
There are 2 StoreFiles after flush two times, the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ShiXing updated HBASE-6269:
---
Attachment: HBASE-6269-trunk-V1.patch
Lazyseek should use the maxSequenseId StoreFile's KeyValue as the
47 matches
Mail list logo