[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22843?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16908442#comment-16908442
]
Sakthi commented on HBASE-22843:
Thanks for the review comments [~stack]. The PR has been merged.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22843?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16907523#comment-16907523
]
Sakthi commented on HBASE-22843:
[~stack], I plan to do the former one. I have my draft patch as a PR
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22843?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16906656#comment-16906656
]
stack commented on HBASE-22843:
---
[~psomogyi] If change is to the HBCK2 local HBaseFsck... it is an
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22843?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16906593#comment-16906593
]
Peter Somogyi commented on HBASE-22843:
---
#2: Will HBCK2 be compatible with pre-2.1.6 versions if
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22843?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16906592#comment-16906592
]
stack commented on HBASE-22843:
---
Thanks.
> [HBCK2] Fix HBCK2 after HBASE-22777 & HBASE-22758
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22843?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16906583#comment-16906583
]
Sakthi commented on HBASE-22843:
Yes [~stack], I think we can carry on with RCs now. :)
> [HBCK2] Fix
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22843?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16906574#comment-16906574
]
stack commented on HBASE-22843:
---
On your suggested change, makes sense that there is an echo of HBCK1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22843?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16906567#comment-16906567
]
stack commented on HBASE-22843:
---
[~jatsakthi] just checking, we can go ahead w/ making RCs now? You will
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22843?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16906508#comment-16906508
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-22843:
---
| (/) *{color:green}+1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote ||
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22843?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16906437#comment-16906437
]
Sakthi commented on HBASE-22843:
Sure, [~stack] let me create a new one.
For #2, I was thinking of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22843?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16906431#comment-16906431
]
stack commented on HBASE-22843:
---
Usually you can make subissues but this is already a subissue and jira
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22843?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16906416#comment-16906416
]
Sakthi commented on HBASE-22843:
Yes, Stack. for #1 we need a change in hbase (let me put up a patch for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22843?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16906411#comment-16906411
]
stack commented on HBASE-22843:
---
Yeah, @InterfaceAudience.Private is on MTA.
> [HBCK2] Fix HBCK2 after
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22843?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16906409#comment-16906409
]
stack commented on HBASE-22843:
---
Good on you Sakthi.
On #1, it was this change that changed the access
14 matches
Mail list logo
