[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-19897) RowMutations should follow the fluent pattern
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19897?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16349739#comment-16349739
]
Hudson commented on HBASE-19897:
FAILURE: Integrated in Jenkins build HBase-Trunk_matrix #4511 (See
[https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-Trunk_matrix/4511/])
HBASE-19897 RowMutations should follow the fluent pattern (chia7712: rev
adccbb7edf3986701d54b9ca93fcf5a8e99548fb)
* (edit)
hbase-server/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/client/TestFromClientSide3.java
* (edit)
hbase-client/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/client/RowMutations.java
> RowMutations should follow the fluent pattern
> -
>
> Key: HBASE-19897
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19897
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: New Feature
>Reporter: Chia-Ping Tsai
>Assignee: Chia-Ping Tsai
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 2.0.0-beta-2
>
> Attachments: HBASE-19897.v0.patch, HBASE-19897.v1.patch,
> HBASE-19897.v1.patch
>
>
> Other row ops, including {{Put}}, {{Delete}}, {{Get}}, {{Scan}}, do have the
> fluent interface. Also, Changing the return type from {{Void}} to
> {{RowMutations}} won't break the API BC (unless someone has interest in
> {{Void}} object...)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-19897) RowMutations should follow the fluent pattern
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19897?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16349318#comment-16349318
]
Chia-Ping Tsai commented on HBASE-19897:
{quote}Until the old method is removed I suppose?
{quote}
yep.
Push it to branch-2 and master. Thanks [~stack] for reviewing.
> RowMutations should follow the fluent pattern
> -
>
> Key: HBASE-19897
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19897
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: New Feature
>Reporter: Chia-Ping Tsai
>Assignee: Chia-Ping Tsai
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 2.0.0-beta-2
>
> Attachments: HBASE-19897.v0.patch, HBASE-19897.v1.patch,
> HBASE-19897.v1.patch
>
>
> Other row ops, including {{Put}}, {{Delete}}, {{Get}}, {{Scan}}, do have the
> fluent interface. Also, Changing the return type from {{Void}} to
> {{RowMutations}} won't break the API BC (unless someone has interest in
> {{Void}} object...)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-19897) RowMutations should follow the fluent pattern
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19897?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16349313#comment-16349313
]
stack commented on HBASE-19897:
---
Thanks [~chia7712] for explaination.
bq. ... If users want to try the fluent way, they must to write
rm.add((Mutation) new Put).
Until the old method is removed I suppose?
Thanks.
> RowMutations should follow the fluent pattern
> -
>
> Key: HBASE-19897
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19897
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: New Feature
>Reporter: Chia-Ping Tsai
>Assignee: Chia-Ping Tsai
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 2.0.0-beta-2
>
> Attachments: HBASE-19897.v0.patch, HBASE-19897.v1.patch,
> HBASE-19897.v1.patch
>
>
> Other row ops, including {{Put}}, {{Delete}}, {{Get}}, {{Scan}}, do have the
> fluent interface. Also, Changing the return type from {{Void}} to
> {{RowMutations}} won't break the API BC (unless someone has interest in
> {{Void}} object...)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-19897) RowMutations should follow the fluent pattern
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19897?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16349283#comment-16349283
]
Chia-Ping Tsai commented on HBASE-19897:
{quote}because the new add has a different return, the compiler is fine w/ this
'override' it seems.
{quote}
It is not related to return type. Compiler always can choose the correct method
according to the passed type. After applying this patch, the *rm.add(new Put)*
still call the deprecated *rm#add(Put)*. If users want to try the fluent way,
they must to write *rm.add((Mutation) new Put).*
> RowMutations should follow the fluent pattern
> -
>
> Key: HBASE-19897
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19897
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: New Feature
>Reporter: Chia-Ping Tsai
>Assignee: Chia-Ping Tsai
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 2.0.0-beta-2
>
> Attachments: HBASE-19897.v0.patch, HBASE-19897.v1.patch,
> HBASE-19897.v1.patch
>
>
> Other row ops, including {{Put}}, {{Delete}}, {{Get}}, {{Scan}}, do have the
> fluent interface. Also, Changing the return type from {{Void}} to
> {{RowMutations}} won't break the API BC (unless someone has interest in
> {{Void}} object...)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-19897) RowMutations should follow the fluent pattern
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19897?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16349268#comment-16349268
]
stack commented on HBASE-19897:
---
TestCacheOnWrite seems flakey. It failed earlier today elsewhere.
So, though Put is a Mutation, because the new add has a different return, the
compiler is fine w/ this 'override' it seems. +1. Nice cleanup.
> RowMutations should follow the fluent pattern
> -
>
> Key: HBASE-19897
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19897
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: New Feature
>Reporter: Chia-Ping Tsai
>Assignee: Chia-Ping Tsai
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 2.0.0-beta-2
>
> Attachments: HBASE-19897.v0.patch, HBASE-19897.v1.patch,
> HBASE-19897.v1.patch
>
>
> Other row ops, including {{Put}}, {{Delete}}, {{Get}}, {{Scan}}, do have the
> fluent interface. Also, Changing the return type from {{Void}} to
> {{RowMutations}} won't break the API BC (unless someone has interest in
> {{Void}} object...)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-19897) RowMutations should follow the fluent pattern
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19897?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16348830#comment-16348830
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-19897:
---
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m
8s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} findbugs {color} | {color:blue} 0m
0s{color} | {color:blue} Findbugs executables are not available. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} hbaseanti {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} Patch does not have any anti-patterns. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} master Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 0m
11s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 4m
33s{color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 1m
4s{color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 1m
33s{color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedjars {color} | {color:green} 6m
19s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building our shaded
downstream artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
48s{color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 0m
14s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 4m
33s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 1m
5s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 1m
5s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
27s{color} | {color:green} hbase-client: The patch generated 0 new + 1
unchanged - 3 fixed = 1 total (was 4) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 1m
6s{color} | {color:green} The patch hbase-server passed checkstyle {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedjars {color} | {color:green} 4m
54s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building our shaded
downstream artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} hadoopcheck {color} | {color:green}
20m 53s{color} | {color:green} Patch does not cause any errors with Hadoop
2.6.5 2.7.4 or 3.0.0. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
55s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 3m
20s{color} | {color:green} hbase-client in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red}108m 45s{color}
| {color:red} hbase-server in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
51s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}155m 31s{color} |
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests | hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.TestCacheOnWrite |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=17.05.0-ce Server=17.05.0-ce Image:yetus/hbase:eee3b01 |
| JIRA Issue | HBASE-19897 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12908802/HBASE-19897.v1.patch |
| Optional Tests | asflicense javac javadoc unit findbugs shadedjars
hadoopcheck hbaseanti checkstyle compile |
| uname | Linux a8be20f3502e 3.13.0-133-generic #182-Ubuntu SMP Tue Sep 19
15:49:21 UTC 2017 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality |
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-19897) RowMutations should follow the fluent pattern
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19897?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16348487#comment-16348487
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-19897:
---
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m
9s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} findbugs {color} | {color:blue} 0m
0s{color} | {color:blue} Findbugs executables are not available. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} hbaseanti {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} Patch does not have any anti-patterns. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} master Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 0m
37s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 5m
1s{color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 1m
9s{color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 1m
37s{color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedjars {color} | {color:green} 6m
25s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building our shaded
downstream artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
50s{color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 0m
12s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 4m
48s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 1m
15s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 1m
15s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
32s{color} | {color:green} hbase-client: The patch generated 0 new + 1
unchanged - 3 fixed = 1 total (was 4) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 1m
15s{color} | {color:green} The patch hbase-server passed checkstyle {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedjars {color} | {color:green} 4m
56s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building our shaded
downstream artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} hadoopcheck {color} | {color:green}
20m 5s{color} | {color:green} Patch does not cause any errors with Hadoop
2.6.5 2.7.4 or 3.0.0. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
53s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 3m
2s{color} | {color:green} hbase-client in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red}320m 3s{color}
| {color:red} hbase-server in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
58s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}367m 51s{color} |
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests | hadoop.hbase.TestNamespace |
| | hadoop.hbase.client.TestAsyncTableScan |
| | hadoop.hbase.regionserver.wal.TestSecureAsyncWALReplay |
| | hadoop.hbase.client.TestMobRestoreSnapshotFromClient |
| | hadoop.hbase.regionserver.wal.TestWALReplay |
| | hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestScannerHeartbeatMessages |
| | hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestHRegionFileSystem |
| | hadoop.hbase.quotas.TestSpaceQuotas |
| | hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestCompoundBloomFilter |
| | hadoop.hbase.snapshot.TestMobRestoreFlushSnapshotFromClient |
| | hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestTags |
| | hadoop.hbase.quotas.TestQuotaObserverChoreRegionReports |
| |
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-19897) RowMutations should follow the fluent pattern
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19897?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16345746#comment-16345746
]
Chia-Ping Tsai commented on HBASE-19897:
I feel the add(Put) and add(Delete) are the great naming. Deprecating them make
me feel embarrassed. :( Close this as "won't fix".
> RowMutations should follow the fluent pattern
> -
>
> Key: HBASE-19897
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19897
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: New Feature
>Reporter: Chia-Ping Tsai
>Assignee: Chia-Ping Tsai
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 2.0.0-beta-2
>
> Attachments: HBASE-19897.v0.patch
>
>
> Other row ops, including {{Put}}, {{Delete}}, {{Get}}, {{Scan}}, do have the
> fluent interface. Also, Changing the return type from {{Void}} to
> {{RowMutations}} won't break the API BC (unless someone has interest in
> {{Void}} object...)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-19897) RowMutations should follow the fluent pattern
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19897?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16345710#comment-16345710
]
Chia-Ping Tsai commented on HBASE-19897:
bq. This is a breaking API change?
IIRC, we require user to recompile their code if they want to migrate code to
2.0. This patch changes the return type from void to RowMutations. User wont
assign the void to any object I believe. The concern here is that users have
their custom RowMutations...Yep, we should add the new methods to avoid the
possible API breaking.
> RowMutations should follow the fluent pattern
> -
>
> Key: HBASE-19897
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19897
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: New Feature
>Reporter: Chia-Ping Tsai
>Assignee: Chia-Ping Tsai
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 2.0.0-beta-2
>
> Attachments: HBASE-19897.v0.patch
>
>
> Other row ops, including {{Put}}, {{Delete}}, {{Get}}, {{Scan}}, do have the
> fluent interface. Also, Changing the return type from {{Void}} to
> {{RowMutations}} won't break the API BC (unless someone has interest in
> {{Void}} object...)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-19897) RowMutations should follow the fluent pattern
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19897?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16345639#comment-16345639
]
stack commented on HBASE-19897:
---
This is a breaking API change [~chia7712] ?
> RowMutations should follow the fluent pattern
> -
>
> Key: HBASE-19897
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19897
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: New Feature
>Reporter: Chia-Ping Tsai
>Assignee: Chia-Ping Tsai
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 2.0.0-beta-2
>
> Attachments: HBASE-19897.v0.patch
>
>
> Other row ops, including {{Put}}, {{Delete}}, {{Get}}, {{Scan}}, do have the
> fluent interface. Also, Changing the return type from {{Void}} to
> {{RowMutations}} won't break the API BC (unless someone has interest in
> {{Void}} object...)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-19897) RowMutations should follow the fluent pattern
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19897?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16345499#comment-16345499
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-19897:
---
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m
13s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} findbugs {color} | {color:blue} 0m
0s{color} | {color:blue} Findbugs executables are not available. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} hbaseanti {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} Patch does not have any anti-patterns. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} test4tests {color} | {color:red} 0m
0s{color} | {color:red} The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified
tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please
list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} master Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 4m
1s{color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
19s{color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
26s{color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedjars {color} | {color:green} 4m
37s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building our shaded
downstream artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
18s{color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 4m
2s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
19s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m
19s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
26s{color} | {color:green} hbase-client: The patch generated 0 new + 2
unchanged - 2 fixed = 2 total (was 4) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedjars {color} | {color:green} 4m
10s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building our shaded
downstream artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} hadoopcheck {color} | {color:green}
16m 21s{color} | {color:green} Patch does not cause any errors with Hadoop
2.6.5 2.7.4 or 3.0.0. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
19s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 2m
55s{color} | {color:green} hbase-client in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
9s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black} 34m 13s{color} |
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=17.05.0-ce Server=17.05.0-ce Image:yetus/hbase:eee3b01 |
| JIRA Issue | HBASE-19897 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12908358/HBASE-19897.v0.patch |
| Optional Tests | asflicense javac javadoc unit findbugs shadedjars
hadoopcheck hbaseanti checkstyle compile |
| uname | Linux 1a6ed6ddc508 4.4.0-43-generic #63-Ubuntu SMP Wed Oct 12
13:48:03 UTC 2016 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality |
/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/component/dev-support/hbase-personality.sh
|
| git revision | master / 194890b694 |
| maven | version: Apache Maven 3.5.2
(138edd61fd100ec658bfa2d307c43b76940a5d7d; 2017-10-18T07:58:13Z) |
| Default Java | 1.8.0_151 |
| Test Results |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/11258/testReport/ |
| Max. process+thread count | 301 (vs. ulimit of 1000) |
| modules | C: hbase-client U: hbase-client |
| Console output |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/11258/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.7.0 http://yetus.apache.org |
This message was automatically
