[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16447177#comment-16447177
]
Hudson commented on HBASE-20459:
Results for branch branch-2.0
[build #208 on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16447175#comment-16447175
]
Hudson commented on HBASE-20459:
Results for branch branch-2
[build #645 on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16447056#comment-16447056
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-20459:
---
+1.
> Majority of scan CPU time in HBase-1 spent in size
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16447028#comment-16447028
]
Hudson commented on HBASE-20459:
Results for branch master
[build #307 on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16447016#comment-16447016
]
Hudson commented on HBASE-20459:
Results for branch branch-1
[build #291 on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16446964#comment-16446964
]
Hudson commented on HBASE-20459:
Results for branch branch-1.4
[build #296 on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16446925#comment-16446925
]
Mike Drob commented on HBASE-20459:
---
bq. I assume branch-2 and branch-2.0 are dead (sorry I've been
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16446917#comment-16446917
]
Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-20459:
Also, this change is not in 1.2 or 1.3 so couldn't have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16446914#comment-16446914
]
Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-20459:
I think you explained why this wasn't found earlier. 1.4
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16446899#comment-16446899
]
Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-20459:
---
Yeah definitely see a difference in CPU usage. Note that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16446892#comment-16446892
]
Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-20459:
---
Committed to branch-1.4, branch-1, and master. I assume
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16446869#comment-16446869
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-20459:
---
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16446848#comment-16446848
]
stack commented on HBASE-20459:
---
.001 is for branch-2; branch-1 patch doesn't apply.
> Majority of scan
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16446847#comment-16446847
]
stack commented on HBASE-20459:
---
+1
You see a difference w/ this in place (I've not been testing Scans of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16446531#comment-16446531
]
Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-20459:
---
What I plan to commit... Another of my patches of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16446492#comment-16446492
]
Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-20459:
---
Okey dokey... Will add do for MemoryLayout too and then
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16445987#comment-16445987
]
stack commented on HBASE-20459:
---
Attached patch for branch-2.0 though haven't applied it. A few of us
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16445890#comment-16445890
]
Mike Drob commented on HBASE-20459:
---
Fix looks fine. Also update the MemoryLayout class too, it has the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16445214#comment-16445214
]
Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-20459:
---
Just this?! Avoids recalculating arrayHeaderSize over and
19 matches
Mail list logo