[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-26890) Make the WAL interface async so sync replication can be built up on the WAL interface

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-26890?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17733148#comment-17733148 ] Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-26890: --- OK, the marker edits only is for transiting from ACTIVE to

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-26890) Make the WAL interface async so sync replication can be built up on the WAL interface

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-26890?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17733142#comment-17733142 ] Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-26890: --- After investigating, I do not think this is the correct way to

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-26890) Make the WAL interface async so sync replication can be built up on the WAL interface

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-26890?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17725443#comment-17725443 ] Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-26890: --- Plan to work on HBASE-20952 again, to build a WAL implementation

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-26890) Make the WAL interface async so sync replication can be built up on the WAL interface

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-26890?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17512733#comment-17512733 ] Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-26890: --- This is related to the WAL refactor issue. We should build sync