[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13183978#comment-13183978
]
Hudson commented on HBASE-5137:
---
Integrated in HBase-TRUNK #2617 (See
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13183413#comment-13183413
]
stack commented on HBASE-5137:
--
@Ram Please commit to 0.92 branch also.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13183424#comment-13183424
]
ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-5137:
---
Committed to 0.92 also.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13183531#comment-13183531
]
Hudson commented on HBASE-5137:
---
Integrated in HBase-0.92 #238 (See
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13183918#comment-13183918
]
Hudson commented on HBASE-5137:
---
Integrated in HBase-0.92-security #71 (See
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13183934#comment-13183934
]
Hudson commented on HBASE-5137:
---
Integrated in HBase-TRUNK-security #72 (See
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13182646#comment-13182646
]
ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-5137:
---
Can we commit this issue ?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13182695#comment-13182695
]
Zhihong Yu commented on HBASE-5137:
---
Yes.
Please don't forget the patch for TRUNK :-)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13182716#comment-13182716
]
stack commented on HBASE-5137:
--
+1 on both patches.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13181963#comment-13181963
]
ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-5137:
---
Patch for 0.90.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13182014#comment-13182014
]
Zhihong Yu commented on HBASE-5137:
---
Minor comment:
{code}
+if
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13182060#comment-13182060
]
ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-5137:
---
@Ted
In trunk we sleep for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13182111#comment-13182111
]
Zhihong Yu commented on HBASE-5137:
---
Nicolas might know the reason for introducing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13182209#comment-13182209
]
Zhihong Yu commented on HBASE-5137:
---
Second patch is fine.
What do you think of the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13181442#comment-13181442
]
Zhihong Yu commented on HBASE-5137:
---
Thanks for reporting this, Ram.
This has been fixed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13181500#comment-13181500
]
ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-5137:
---
@Ted
One more thing, we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13181624#comment-13181624
]
Zhihong Yu commented on HBASE-5137:
---
@Ram:
Good point. The current logic assumes that if
17 matches
Mail list logo