[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6861) HFileOutputFormat set TIMERANGE wrongly

2013-02-24 Thread Anoop Sam John (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6861?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13585367#comment-13585367
 ] 

Anoop Sam John commented on HBASE-6861:
---

[~emorozov] Pls check with the latest Trunk code. With HBASE-3776 this issue 
also get fixed.
[~stack], [~yuzhih...@gmail.com] Can we close this issue?

 HFileOutputFormat set TIMERANGE wrongly
 ---

 Key: HBASE-6861
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6861
 Project: HBase
  Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Eugene Morozov
Priority: Minor
 Attachments: diff


 In case if timestamps for KeyValues specified differently for different 
 column families, then TIMERANGEs of both HFiles would be wrong.
 Example (in pseudo code): my reducer has a condition
 if ( condition ) {
   keyValue = new KeyValue(.., CF1, .., timestamp, ..);
 } else {
   keyValue = new KeyValue(.., CF2, .., ..); // - no timestamp
 }
 context.write( keyValue );
 These two keyValues would be written into two different HFiles.
 But the code, which is actually write do the following:
   // we now have the proper HLog writer. full steam ahead
   kv.updateLatestStamp(this.now);
   trt.includeTimestamp(kv);
   wl.writer.append(kv);
 Basically, two HFiles shares the same instance of trt (TimeRangeTracker), 
 which leads to the same TIMERANGEs of both of them. Which is definitely 
 incorrect, because first HFile must have TIMERANGE=timestamp...timestamp, 
 cause we do not write any other timestamps there. And another HFile must have 
 TIMERANGE=now...now by same meaning.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6861) HFileOutputFormat set TIMERANGE wrongly

2012-10-01 Thread Ted Yu (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6861?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13466897#comment-13466897
 ] 

Ted Yu commented on HBASE-6861:
---

@Eugene:
Consider using the formatter from HBASE-5961.

 HFileOutputFormat set TIMERANGE wrongly
 ---

 Key: HBASE-6861
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6861
 Project: HBase
  Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Eugene Morozov
Priority: Minor
 Attachments: diff


 In case if timestamps for KeyValues specified differently for different 
 column families, then TIMERANGEs of both HFiles would be wrong.
 Example (in pseudo code): my reducer has a condition
 if ( condition ) {
   keyValue = new KeyValue(.., CF1, .., timestamp, ..);
 } else {
   keyValue = new KeyValue(.., CF2, .., ..); // - no timestamp
 }
 context.write( keyValue );
 These two keyValues would be written into two different HFiles.
 But the code, which is actually write do the following:
   // we now have the proper HLog writer. full steam ahead
   kv.updateLatestStamp(this.now);
   trt.includeTimestamp(kv);
   wl.writer.append(kv);
 Basically, two HFiles shares the same instance of trt (TimeRangeTracker), 
 which leads to the same TIMERANGEs of both of them. Which is definitely 
 incorrect, because first HFile must have TIMERANGE=timestamp...timestamp, 
 cause we do not write any other timestamps there. And another HFile must have 
 TIMERANGE=now...now by same meaning.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6861) HFileOutputFormat set TIMERANGE wrongly

2012-09-28 Thread Eugene Morozov (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6861?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13465475#comment-13465475
 ] 

Eugene Morozov commented on HBASE-6861:
---

Basically yes, but it looks more like hack, than patch. I believe it's not 
correct to commit it to trunk. Do you still want me to share it?

 HFileOutputFormat set TIMERANGE wrongly
 ---

 Key: HBASE-6861
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6861
 Project: HBase
  Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Eugene Morozov
Priority: Minor

 In case if timestamps for KeyValues specified differently for different 
 column families, then TIMERANGEs of both HFiles would be wrong.
 Example (in pseudo code): my reducer has a condition
 if ( condition ) {
   keyValue = new KeyValue(.., CF1, .., timestamp, ..);
 } else {
   keyValue = new KeyValue(.., CF2, .., ..); // - no timestamp
 }
 context.write( keyValue );
 These two keyValues would be written into two different HFiles.
 But the code, which is actually write do the following:
   // we now have the proper HLog writer. full steam ahead
   kv.updateLatestStamp(this.now);
   trt.includeTimestamp(kv);
   wl.writer.append(kv);
 Basically, two HFiles shares the same instance of trt (TimeRangeTracker), 
 which leads to the same TIMERANGEs of both of them. Which is definitely 
 incorrect, because first HFile must have TIMERANGE=timestamp...timestamp, 
 cause we do not write any other timestamps there. And another HFile must have 
 TIMERANGE=now...now by same meaning.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6861) HFileOutputFormat set TIMERANGE wrongly

2012-09-28 Thread stack (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6861?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13465751#comment-13465751
 ] 

stack commented on HBASE-6861:
--

I'd suggest adding the patch here anyways.  It could inspire a patch that would 
get committed to trunk.  Thanks.

 HFileOutputFormat set TIMERANGE wrongly
 ---

 Key: HBASE-6861
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6861
 Project: HBase
  Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Eugene Morozov
Priority: Minor

 In case if timestamps for KeyValues specified differently for different 
 column families, then TIMERANGEs of both HFiles would be wrong.
 Example (in pseudo code): my reducer has a condition
 if ( condition ) {
   keyValue = new KeyValue(.., CF1, .., timestamp, ..);
 } else {
   keyValue = new KeyValue(.., CF2, .., ..); // - no timestamp
 }
 context.write( keyValue );
 These two keyValues would be written into two different HFiles.
 But the code, which is actually write do the following:
   // we now have the proper HLog writer. full steam ahead
   kv.updateLatestStamp(this.now);
   trt.includeTimestamp(kv);
   wl.writer.append(kv);
 Basically, two HFiles shares the same instance of trt (TimeRangeTracker), 
 which leads to the same TIMERANGEs of both of them. Which is definitely 
 incorrect, because first HFile must have TIMERANGE=timestamp...timestamp, 
 cause we do not write any other timestamps there. And another HFile must have 
 TIMERANGE=now...now by same meaning.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6861) HFileOutputFormat set TIMERANGE wrongly

2012-09-27 Thread stack (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6861?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13465032#comment-13465032
 ] 

stack commented on HBASE-6861:
--

You have a patch Eugene?  Thanks.

 HFileOutputFormat set TIMERANGE wrongly
 ---

 Key: HBASE-6861
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6861
 Project: HBase
  Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Eugene Morozov
Priority: Minor

 In case if timestamps for KeyValues specified differently for different 
 column families, then TIMERANGEs of both HFiles would be wrong.
 Example (in pseudo code): my reducer has a condition
 if ( condition ) {
   keyValue = new KeyValue(.., CF1, .., timestamp, ..);
 } else {
   keyValue = new KeyValue(.., CF2, .., ..); // - no timestamp
 }
 context.write( keyValue );
 These two keyValues would be written into two different HFiles.
 But the code, which is actually write do the following:
   // we now have the proper HLog writer. full steam ahead
   kv.updateLatestStamp(this.now);
   trt.includeTimestamp(kv);
   wl.writer.append(kv);
 Basically, two HFiles shares the same instance of trt (TimeRangeTracker), 
 which leads to the same TIMERANGEs of both of them. Which is definitely 
 incorrect, because first HFile must have TIMERANGE=timestamp...timestamp, 
 cause we do not write any other timestamps there. And another HFile must have 
 TIMERANGE=now...now by same meaning.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira