cuijianwei created HBASE-8656:
---------------------------------

             Summary: Rpc call may not be notified in SecureClient
                 Key: HBASE-8656
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8656
             Project: HBase
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: Client, IPC/RPC, security
    Affects Versions: 0.94.7
            Reporter: cuijianwei


In SecureClient.java, rpc responses will be processed by receiveResponse() 
which looks like:
{code}
try {
        int id = in.readInt();                    // try to read an id

        if (LOG.isDebugEnabled())
          LOG.debug(getName() + " got value #" + id);

        Call call = calls.remove(id);

        int state = in.readInt();     // read call status
        if (LOG.isDebugEnabled()) {
          LOG.debug("call #"+id+" state is " + state);
        }
        if (state == Status.SUCCESS.state) {
          Writable value = ReflectionUtils.newInstance(valueClass, conf);
          value.readFields(in);                 // read value
          if (LOG.isDebugEnabled()) {
            LOG.debug("call #"+id+", response is:\n"+value.toString());
          }
          // it's possible that this call may have been cleaned up due to a RPC
          // timeout, so check if it still exists before setting the value.
          if (call != null) {
            call.setValue(value);
          }
        } else if (state == Status.ERROR.state) {
          if (call != null) {
            call.setException(new RemoteException(WritableUtils.readString(in), 
WritableUtils
                .readString(in)));
          }
        } else if (state == Status.FATAL.state) {
          // Close the connection
          markClosed(new RemoteException(WritableUtils.readString(in),
                                         WritableUtils.readString(in)));
        }
      } catch (IOException e) {
        if (e instanceof SocketTimeoutException && remoteId.rpcTimeout > 0) {
          // Clean up open calls but don't treat this as a fatal condition,
          // since we expect certain responses to not make it by the specified
          // {@link ConnectionId#rpcTimeout}.
          closeException = e;
        } else {
          // Since the server did not respond within the default ping interval
          // time, treat this as a fatal condition and close this connection
          markClosed(e);
        }
      } finally {
        if (remoteId.rpcTimeout > 0) {
          cleanupCalls(remoteId.rpcTimeout);
        }
      }
    }
{code}
In above code, in the try block, the call will be firstly removed from call map 
by:
{code}
        Call call = calls.remove(id);
{code}
There may be two cases leading the call couldn't be notified and the invoking 
thread will wait forever. 
Firstly, if the returned status is Status.FATAL.state by:
{code}
        int state = in.readInt();     // read call status
{code}
The code will come into:
{code}
} else if (state == Status.FATAL.state) {
          // Close the connection
          markClosed(new RemoteException(WritableUtils.readString(in),
                                         WritableUtils.readString(in)));
        }
{code}
Here, the SecureConnection is marked as closed and all rpc calls in call map of 
this connection will be notified to receive an exception. However, the current 
rpc call has been removed from the call map, it won't be notified.
Secondly, after the call has been removed by:
{code}
        Call call = calls.remove(id);
{code}
If we encounter any exception before the 'try' block finished, the code will 
come into 'catch' and 'finally' block, neither 'catch' block nor 'finally' 
block will notify the rpc call because it has been removed from call map.
Compared with receiveResponse() in HBaseClient.java, it may be better to get 
the rpc call from call map and remove it at the end of the 'try' block.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to