[jira] [Commented] (HIVE-15565) LLAP: GroupByOperator flushes hash table too frequently

2017-01-19 Thread Hive QA (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-15565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15831308#comment-15831308 ] Hive QA commented on HIVE-15565: Here are the results of testing the latest attachment:

[jira] [Commented] (HIVE-15565) LLAP: GroupByOperator flushes hash table too frequently

2017-01-18 Thread Prasanth Jayachandran (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-15565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15829282#comment-15829282 ] Prasanth Jayachandran commented on HIVE-15565: -- This delays the memory check hoping memory

[jira] [Commented] (HIVE-15565) LLAP: GroupByOperator flushes hash table too frequently

2017-01-18 Thread Rajesh Balamohan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-15565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15829231#comment-15829231 ] Rajesh Balamohan commented on HIVE-15565: - Reverted the patch. Will post a separate patch for

[jira] [Commented] (HIVE-15565) LLAP: GroupByOperator flushes hash table too frequently

2017-01-18 Thread Rajesh Balamohan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-15565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15829228#comment-15829228 ] Rajesh Balamohan commented on HIVE-15565: - Had offline discussion with [~prasanth_j] on this. We

[jira] [Commented] (HIVE-15565) LLAP: GroupByOperator flushes hash table too frequently

2017-01-18 Thread Siddharth Seth (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-15565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15828993#comment-15828993 ] Siddharth Seth commented on HIVE-15565: --- After the patch, we won't flush in LLAP GroupBy, correct?

[jira] [Commented] (HIVE-15565) LLAP: GroupByOperator flushes hash table too frequently

2017-01-16 Thread Rajesh Balamohan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-15565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15824756#comment-15824756 ] Rajesh Balamohan commented on HIVE-15565: - As per old impl, maxMemory in {{GroupByOperator}} was

[jira] [Commented] (HIVE-15565) LLAP: GroupByOperator flushes hash table too frequently

2017-01-16 Thread Sergey Shelukhin (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-15565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15824655#comment-15824655 ] Sergey Shelukhin commented on HIVE-15565: - Looking at it again (and at [~prasanth_j] 's comment

[jira] [Commented] (HIVE-15565) LLAP: GroupByOperator flushes hash table too frequently

2017-01-16 Thread Gunther Hagleitner (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-15565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15824647#comment-15824647 ] Gunther Hagleitner commented on HIVE-15565: --- I don't understand this - isn't the commit doing

[jira] [Commented] (HIVE-15565) LLAP: GroupByOperator flushes hash table too frequently

2017-01-09 Thread Sergey Shelukhin (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-15565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15813221#comment-15813221 ] Sergey Shelukhin commented on HIVE-15565: - +1 > LLAP: GroupByOperator flushes hash table too

[jira] [Commented] (HIVE-15565) LLAP: GroupByOperator flushes hash table too frequently

2017-01-09 Thread Hive QA (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-15565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15811206#comment-15811206 ] Hive QA commented on HIVE-15565: Here are the results of testing the latest attachment:

[jira] [Commented] (HIVE-15565) LLAP: GroupByOperator flushes hash table too frequently

2017-01-09 Thread Prasanth Jayachandran (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-15565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15811045#comment-15811045 ] Prasanth Jayachandran commented on HIVE-15565: -- For LLAP, GBY hashtable memory should be