[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-17018?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16084774#comment-16084774
 ] 

liyunzhang_intel edited comment on HIVE-17018 at 7/14/17 1:19 AM:
------------------------------------------------------------------

[~csun]: 
{quote}
Yes. I think we don't need to change the existing behavior. I'm just suggesting 
that we might need a HoS specific config to replace 
hive.auto.convert.join.nonconditionaltask.size
{quote}
rename {{hive.auto.convert.join.nonconditionaltask.size}} to 
{{hive.auto.convert.join.within.sparktask.size}}? and the description of the 
configuration 
is changed from
{noformat} 
the sum of size for n-1 of the tables/partitions for a n-way join is smaller 
than it
{noformat}

to 
{noformat}

the sum of size for n-1 of the tables/partitions for a n-way join is smaller 
than it in 1 MapTask or ReduceTask
{noformat}


Can you give some suggestion?



was (Author: kellyzly):
[~csun]: 
{quote}
Yes. I think we don't need to change the existing behavior. I'm just suggesting 
that we might need a HoS specific config to replace 
hive.auto.convert.join.nonconditionaltask.size
{quote}
rename {{hive.auto.convert.join.nonconditionaltask.size}} to 
{{hive.auto.convert.join.within.sparktask.size}}? and the description of the 
configuration 
{noformat} is changed from
the sum of size for n-1 of the tables/partitions for a n-way join is smaller 
than it
{noformat}

to 
{noformat}

the sum of size for n-1 of the tables/partitions for a n-way join is smaller 
than it in 1 MapTask or ReduceTask
{noformat}


Can you give some suggestion?


> Small table is converted to map join even the total size of small tables 
> exceeds the threshold(hive.auto.convert.join.noconditionaltask.size)
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HIVE-17018
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-17018
>             Project: Hive
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: liyunzhang_intel
>            Assignee: liyunzhang_intel
>         Attachments: HIVE-17018_data_init.q, HIVE-17018.q, t3.txt
>
>
>  we use "hive.auto.convert.join.noconditionaltask.size" as the threshold. it 
> means  the sum of size for n-1 of the tables/partitions for a n-way join is 
> smaller than it, it will be converted to a map join. for example, A join B 
> join C join D join E. Big table is A(100M), small tables are 
> B(10M),C(10M),D(10M),E(10M).  If we set 
> hive.auto.convert.join.noconditionaltask.size=20M. In current code, E,D,B 
> will be converted to map join but C will not be converted to map join. In my 
> understanding, because hive.auto.convert.join.noconditionaltask.size can only 
> contain E and D, so C and B should not be converted to map join.  
> Let's explain more why E can be converted to map join.
> in current code, 
> [SparkMapJoinOptimizer#getConnectedMapJoinSize|https://github.com/apache/hive/blob/master/ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/optimizer/spark/SparkMapJoinOptimizer.java#L364]
>  calculates all the mapjoins  in the parent path and child path. The search 
> stops when encountering [UnionOperator or 
> ReduceOperator|https://github.com/apache/hive/blob/master/ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/optimizer/spark/SparkMapJoinOptimizer.java#L381].
>  Because C is not converted to map join because {{connectedMapJoinSize + 
> totalSize) > maxSize}} [see 
> code|https://github.com/apache/hive/blob/master/ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/optimizer/spark/SparkMapJoinOptimizer.java#L330].The
>  RS before the join of C remains. When calculating whether B will be 
> converted to map join, {{getConnectedMapJoinSize}} returns 0 as encountering 
> [RS 
> |https://github.com/apache/hive/blob/master/ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/optimizer/spark/SparkMapJoinOptimizer.java#409]
>  and causes  {{connectedMapJoinSize + totalSize) < maxSize}} matches.
> [~xuefuz] or [~jxiang]: can you help see whether this is a bug or not  as you 
> are more familiar with SparkJoinOptimizer.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to