[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-13097) Ignite OOMs when from local tests with many Caches

Scott Feldstein created IGNITE-13097: Summary: Ignite OOMs when from local tests with many Caches Key: IGNITE-13097 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13097 Project: Ignite

[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-13093) Unidentified Apache Ignite worker blocked when inserting large amount of records to the persistent storage

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13093?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tomasz Grygo updated IGNITE-13093: -- Attachment: 20_05_29__14_51.out.log > Unidentified Apache Ignite worker blocked when

[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-13093) Unidentified Apache Ignite worker blocked when inserting large amount of records to the persistent storage

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13093?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17119914#comment-17119914 ] Tomasz Grygo commented on IGNITE-13093: --- log attached > Unidentified Apache Ignite worker

[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-12823) .NET: Service method with user type array parameter can't be found

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12823?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17119912#comment-17119912 ] Pavel Tupitsyn commented on IGNITE-12823: - Merged to master:

[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-13093) Unidentified Apache Ignite worker blocked when inserting large amount of records to the persistent storage

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13093?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17119795#comment-17119795 ] Tomasz Grygo commented on IGNITE-13093: --- I'll do that for the test, but I wanted to keep DEBUG

[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-13084) Update BouncyCastle dependency for ignite-aws

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13084?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17119774#comment-17119774 ] Ignite TC Bot commented on IGNITE-13084: {panel:title=Branch: [pull/7861/head] Base: [master] :

[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-13093) Unidentified Apache Ignite worker blocked when inserting large amount of records to the persistent storage

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13093?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17119748#comment-17119748 ] Stanilovsky Evgeny commented on IGNITE-13093: - that`s right, as been mention earlier by

[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-13081) RestProcessor can hang during shutdown on start if discovery SPI failed

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13081?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17119709#comment-17119709 ] Ignite TC Bot commented on IGNITE-13081: {panel:title=Branch: [pull/7859/head] Base: [master] :

[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-13083) Double adding "onSegmentArchived" observer to SegmentArchivedStorage

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13083?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17119710#comment-17119710 ] Ignite TC Bot commented on IGNITE-13083: {panel:title=Branch: [pull/7860/head] Base: [master] :

[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-13084) Update BouncyCastle dependency for ignite-aws

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13084?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17119711#comment-17119711 ] Ignite TC Bot commented on IGNITE-13084: {panel:title=Branch: [pull/7861/head] Base: [master] :

[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-13093) Unidentified Apache Ignite worker blocked when inserting large amount of records to the persistent storage

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13093?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17119694#comment-17119694 ] Tomasz Grygo commented on IGNITE-13093: --- log4j2.xml added > Unidentified Apache Ignite worker

[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-13093) Unidentified Apache Ignite worker blocked when inserting large amount of records to the persistent storage

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13093?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tomasz Grygo updated IGNITE-13093: -- Attachment: log4j2.xml > Unidentified Apache Ignite worker blocked when inserting large

[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-12823) .NET: Service method with user type array parameter can't be found

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12823?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17119693#comment-17119693 ] Ignite TC Bot commented on IGNITE-12823: {panel:title=Branch: [pull/7844/head] Base: [master] :

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-13096) Java thin client: Binary type schema is not registered for nested objects when CompactFooter is enabled

Aleksey Plekhanov created IGNITE-13096: -- Summary: Java thin client: Binary type schema is not registered for nested objects when CompactFooter is enabled Key: IGNITE-13096 URL:

[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-13093) Unidentified Apache Ignite worker blocked when inserting large amount of records to the persistent storage

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13093?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17119644#comment-17119644 ] Stanilovsky Evgeny commented on IGNITE-13093: - ok, show your log4j2.xml > Unidentified

[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-13078) С++: Add CMake build support

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13078?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17119600#comment-17119600 ] Ivan Daschinskiy commented on IGNITE-13078: --- [~isapego] I suppose that patch is ready for

[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-13092) ConcurrentModificationException when adding items to cache

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13092?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tomasz Grygo updated IGNITE-13092: -- Attachment: ignite.xml Environment: Java 1.8.0_231 Apache Ignite 2.8.1 Windows 10, 64G

[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-13093) Unidentified Apache Ignite worker blocked when inserting large amount of records to the persistent storage

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13093?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17119587#comment-17119587 ] Tomasz Grygo commented on IGNITE-13093: --- I moved ignite config and thread dump to an attachment.

[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-13093) Unidentified Apache Ignite worker blocked when inserting large amount of records to the persistent storage

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13093?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tomasz Grygo updated IGNITE-13093: -- Attachment: ignite.xml thread_dump.txt Environment: Java 1.8.0_231

[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-12376) Change level of "TCP client created ..." log messages to WARN

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17119567#comment-17119567 ] Surkov Aleksandr commented on IGNITE-12376: --- [~alexpl] Could you please review my PR? >

[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-12376) Change level of "TCP client created ..." log messages to WARN

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17119562#comment-17119562 ] Ignite TC Bot commented on IGNITE-12376: {panel:title=Branch: [pull/7090/head] Base: [master] :

[jira] [Comment Edited] (IGNITE-12297) Detect lost partitions is not happened during cluster activation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16975026#comment-16975026 ] Matija Polajnar edited comment on IGNITE-12297 at 5/29/20, 12:04 PM:

[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-13016) Fix backward checking of failed node.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13016?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17119489#comment-17119489 ] Ignite TC Bot commented on IGNITE-13016: {panel:title=Branch: [pull/7838/head] Base: [master] :

[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-13050) ClusterGroup that is recomputed on topology change

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13050?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17119484#comment-17119484 ] Anton Kalashnikov commented on IGNITE-13050: [~ibessonov] LGTM. It can be merged. >

[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-12845) GridNioServer can infinitely lose some events

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12845?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17119477#comment-17119477 ] Aleksey Plekhanov commented on IGNITE-12845: [~ptupitsyn] not yet. I've tried approach 2

[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-12823) .NET: Service method with user type array parameter can't be found

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12823?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17119476#comment-17119476 ] Nikolai Kulagin commented on IGNITE-12823: -- LGTM > .NET: Service method with user type array

[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-12823) .NET: Service method with user type array parameter can't be found

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12823?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17119470#comment-17119470 ] Alexey Kukushkin commented on IGNITE-12823: --- [~ptupitsyn], thank you, I approved the pull

[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-13062) DistributedMetaStoragePersistentTest.testJoinNodeWithLongerHistory failed

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13062?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17119431#comment-17119431 ] Ignite TC Bot commented on IGNITE-13062: {panel:title=Branch: [pull/7837/head] Base: [master] :

[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-13058) GridCommandHandlerTest.testKillHangingRemoteTransactions failed

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13058?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17119432#comment-17119432 ] Ignite TC Bot commented on IGNITE-13058: {panel:title=Branch: [pull/7834/head] Base: [master] :

[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-13048) WAL FSYNC mode doesn't work with disabled archiver

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13048?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17119429#comment-17119429 ] Ignite TC Bot commented on IGNITE-13048: {panel:title=Branch: [pull/7829/head] Base: [master] :

[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-13050) ClusterGroup that is recomputed on topology change

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13050?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17119430#comment-17119430 ] Ignite TC Bot commented on IGNITE-13050: {panel:title=Branch: [pull/7831/head] Base: [master] :

[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-11298) TcpCommunicationSpi does not support TLSv1.3

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11298?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17119425#comment-17119425 ] Ilya Kasnacheev commented on IGNITE-11298: -- >From SO: Your fix only covers the case where the

[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-13092) ConcurrentModificationException when adding items to cache

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13092?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17119404#comment-17119404 ] Roman Kondakov commented on IGNITE-13092: - Please, check 

[jira] [Comment Edited] (IGNITE-13051) Optimized affinity switch on baseline node left is broken for client topology and MVCC

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13051?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17119377#comment-17119377 ] Maksim Timonin edited comment on IGNITE-13051 at 5/29/20, 7:54 AM: ---

[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-13051) Optimized affinity switch on baseline node left is broken for client topology and MVCC

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13051?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17119377#comment-17119377 ] Maksim Timonin commented on IGNITE-13051: - [~ascherbakov] hi! Could you please check the PR? >

[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-13051) Optimized affinity switch on baseline node left is broken for client topology and MVCC

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13051?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Maksim Timonin updated IGNITE-13051: Reviewer: Alexey Scherbakov (was: Igor Seliverstov) > Optimized affinity switch on

[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-13051) Optimized affinity switch on baseline node left is broken for client topology and MVCC

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13051?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17119368#comment-17119368 ] Igor Seliverstov commented on IGNITE-13051: --- [~timonin.maksim], Looks good to me, at least I

[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-13017) Remove hardcoded delay from re-marking failed node as alive.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13017?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17119360#comment-17119360 ] Ignite TC Bot commented on IGNITE-13017: {panel:title=Branch: [pull/7870/head] Base: [master] :

[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-12845) GridNioServer can infinitely lose some events

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12845?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17119356#comment-17119356 ] Pavel Tupitsyn commented on IGNITE-12845: - [~alex_pl] [~ivandasch] any updates on this issue?

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-13095) .NET: Thin Client Compute does not cancel task on server when cancelled on client

Pavel Tupitsyn created IGNITE-13095: --- Summary: .NET: Thin Client Compute does not cancel task on server when cancelled on client Key: IGNITE-13095 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13095