[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-2899) BinaryObject is deserialized before getting passed to CacheInterceptor

2016-05-23 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15296669#comment-15296669 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on IGNITE-2899: Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-2899) BinaryObject is deserialized before getting passed to CacheInterceptor

2016-05-20 Thread Artem Shutak (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15293090#comment-15293090 ] Artem Shutak commented on IGNITE-2899: -- Semen, Thanks for pointing this out! Fixed the second

[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-2899) BinaryObject is deserialized before getting passed to CacheInterceptor

2016-05-19 Thread Semen Boikov (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15292055#comment-15292055 ] Semen Boikov commented on IGNITE-2899: -- Hi, - there is 'TODO delete one of isCLient methods' in

[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-2899) BinaryObject is deserialized before getting passed to CacheInterceptor

2016-05-18 Thread Artem Shutak (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15289430#comment-15289430 ] Artem Shutak commented on IGNITE-2899: -- Fixed p1 in a more right way. Waiting for TC results. >

[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-2899) BinaryObject is deserialized before getting passed to CacheInterceptor

2016-05-12 Thread Artem Shutak (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15281582#comment-15281582 ] Artem Shutak commented on IGNITE-2899: -- 1. Removed isLocal check and run TC. As I remember, some

[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-2899) BinaryObject is deserialized before getting passed to CacheInterceptor

2016-05-05 Thread Semen Boikov (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15271947#comment-15271947 ] Semen Boikov commented on IGNITE-2899: -- Reviewed, looks good, minor comments: - change in

[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-2899) BinaryObject is deserialized before getting passed to CacheInterceptor

2016-04-27 Thread Artem Shutak (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15260346#comment-15260346 ] Artem Shutak commented on IGNITE-2899: -- Fixed .Net and another issues founded on TC. Run all TC

[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-2899) BinaryObject is deserialized before getting passed to CacheInterceptor

2016-04-24 Thread Artem Shutak (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15255696#comment-15255696 ] Artem Shutak commented on IGNITE-2899: -- Fixed issues founded on TC. Now I have issue with .Net and

[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-2899) BinaryObject is deserialized before getting passed to CacheInterceptor

2016-04-21 Thread Artem Shutak (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15252516#comment-15252516 ] Artem Shutak commented on IGNITE-2899: -- Fixed swap.removeOffheap for all mentioned 3 methods

[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-2899) BinaryObject is deserialized before getting passed to CacheInterceptor

2016-04-12 Thread Semen Boikov (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15237008#comment-15237008 ] Semen Boikov commented on IGNITE-2899: -- Reviewed, did some minor changes, please take a look. You

[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-2899) BinaryObject is deserialized before getting passed to CacheInterceptor

2016-04-11 Thread Artem Shutak (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15235134#comment-15235134 ] Artem Shutak commented on IGNITE-2899: -- Filed an issue IGNITE-2973 for 1.3. > BinaryObject is

[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-2899) BinaryObject is deserialized before getting passed to CacheInterceptor

2016-04-11 Thread Artem Shutak (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15234914#comment-15234914 ] Artem Shutak commented on IGNITE-2899: -- Investigated point 1. The issue happens under following

[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-2899) BinaryObject is deserialized before getting passed to CacheInterceptor

2016-04-08 Thread Artem Shutak (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15232727#comment-15232727 ] Artem Shutak commented on IGNITE-2899: -- Fixed new tx tests. Currently have 2 different failures. #

[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-2899) BinaryObject is deserialized before getting passed to CacheInterceptor

2016-04-07 Thread Artem Shutak (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15230886#comment-15230886 ] Artem Shutak commented on IGNITE-2899: -- Added tests on explicit transactions and got new failures.

[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-2899) BinaryObject is deserialized before getting passed to CacheInterceptor

2016-04-07 Thread Artem Shutak (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15230611#comment-15230611 ] Artem Shutak commented on IGNITE-2899: -- 1.5 Fixed 2.1 Found a root cause.Did potential fix, but not

[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-2899) BinaryObject is deserialized before getting passed to CacheInterceptor

2016-03-31 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15220029#comment-15220029 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on IGNITE-2899: GitHub user ashutakGG opened a pull request:

[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-2899) BinaryObject is deserialized before getting passed to CacheInterceptor

2016-03-31 Thread Artem Shutak (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15219996#comment-15219996 ] Artem Shutak commented on IGNITE-2899: -- Found another {{withKeepBinary}} related issue. We have

[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-2899) BinaryObject is deserialized before getting passed to CacheInterceptor

2016-03-31 Thread Artem Shutak (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15219851#comment-15219851 ] Artem Shutak commented on IGNITE-2899: -- I will fix it for both {{getValue()}} and {{getKey()}}.

[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-2899) BinaryObject is deserialized before getting passed to CacheInterceptor

2016-03-31 Thread Artem Shutak (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15219846#comment-15219846 ] Artem Shutak commented on IGNITE-2899: -- Found that {{EntryProcessor}}'s user code can achieved

[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-2899) BinaryObject is deserialized before getting passed to CacheInterceptor

2016-03-31 Thread Artem Shutak (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15219434#comment-15219434 ] Artem Shutak commented on IGNITE-2899: -- The original case has been fixed. Working on tests and fixes

[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-2899) BinaryObject is deserialized before getting passed to CacheInterceptor

2016-03-30 Thread Artem Shutak (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15217881#comment-15217881 ] Artem Shutak commented on IGNITE-2899: -- I will take care of this issue. But I need to notice that