[jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (IGNITE-4908) Ignite.reentrantLock looks much slower than IgniteCache.lock.

2018-05-04 Thread Alexander Menshikov (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4908?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alexander Menshikov updated IGNITE-4908: Comment: was deleted (was: Current status of the task: The reviewer [~NIzhikov]

[jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (IGNITE-4908) Ignite.reentrantLock looks much slower than IgniteCache.lock.

2017-09-04 Thread Alexander Menshikov (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4908?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alexander Menshikov updated IGNITE-4908: Comment: was deleted (was: May be Later I will look at our lock implementations.

[jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (IGNITE-4908) Ignite.reentrantLock looks much slower than IgniteCache.lock.

2017-06-02 Thread Alexander Menshikov (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4908?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alexander Menshikov updated IGNITE-4908: Comment: was deleted (was: [~amashenkov] , I was busy by working on IGNITE-4501.

[jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (IGNITE-4908) Ignite.reentrantLock looks much slower than IgniteCache.lock.

2017-04-05 Thread Alexander Menshikov (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4908?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alexander Menshikov updated IGNITE-4908: Comment: was deleted (was: [~amashenkov] The formatting got corrupted :( I can