[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-11729) Low description for lost policy functional
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11729?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ARomantsov updated IGNITE-11729: Description: Current description in https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/partition-loss-policies seems not covered persistence case and text description is not clear Probably we need to transform it into two tables (in-memory, persistence) Rows - cache_write, cache_read, cache_remove,sql_read, sql_write Columns - READ_ONLY_SAFE ,READ_ONLY_ALL, READ_WRITE_SAFE, etc {code:java} Policies Ignite supports the following PartitionLossPolicies: READ_ONLY_SAFE - all writes to a cache/table will fail with an exception. Reads will only be allowed for entries belonging to survived/alive partitions. Reads from lost partitions will fail with an exception. READ_ONLY_ALL - reads are allowed from any partition including the lost ones. An exception is thrown in an attempt to write to any partition. The result of reading from a lost partition is undefined and may be different on different nodes in the cluster. READ_WRITE_SAFE - all reads and writes are allowed for entries in survived/alive partitions. All reads and writes of entries belonging to the lost partitions will fail with an exception. READ_WRITE_ALL - all reads and writes will proceed as if all partitions were in a consistent state (as if no partition loss happened). The result of reading from a lost partition is undefined and may be different on different nodes in the cluster. IGNORE - this mode never marks a lost partition as lost, pretending that no partition loss has happened and clearing the partition loss state right away. Technically, the partition will not be added to the collection of lostPartitions which is the main difference from READ_WRITE_ALL mode. IGNORE mode is used by default. {code} was: Current description in https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/partition-loss-policies seems not covered persistence case and text description is not clean Probably we need to transform it into two tables (in-memory, persistence) Rows - cache_write, cache_read, cache_remove,sql_read, sql_write Columns - READ_ONLY_SAFE ,READ_ONLY_ALL, READ_WRITE_SAFE, etc {code:java} Policies Ignite supports the following PartitionLossPolicies: READ_ONLY_SAFE - all writes to a cache/table will fail with an exception. Reads will only be allowed for entries belonging to survived/alive partitions. Reads from lost partitions will fail with an exception. READ_ONLY_ALL - reads are allowed from any partition including the lost ones. An exception is thrown in an attempt to write to any partition. The result of reading from a lost partition is undefined and may be different on different nodes in the cluster. READ_WRITE_SAFE - all reads and writes are allowed for entries in survived/alive partitions. All reads and writes of entries belonging to the lost partitions will fail with an exception. READ_WRITE_ALL - all reads and writes will proceed as if all partitions were in a consistent state (as if no partition loss happened). The result of reading from a lost partition is undefined and may be different on different nodes in the cluster. IGNORE - this mode never marks a lost partition as lost, pretending that no partition loss has happened and clearing the partition loss state right away. Technically, the partition will not be added to the collection of lostPartitions which is the main difference from READ_WRITE_ALL mode. IGNORE mode is used by default. {code} > Low description for lost policy functional > -- > > Key: IGNITE-11729 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11729 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation >Affects Versions: 2.7 >Reporter: ARomantsov >Priority: Major > Fix For: 3.0, 2.8 > > > Current description in > https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/partition-loss-policies seems not covered > persistence case and text description is not clear > Probably we need to transform it into two tables (in-memory, persistence) > Rows - cache_write, cache_read, cache_remove,sql_read, sql_write > Columns - READ_ONLY_SAFE ,READ_ONLY_ALL, READ_WRITE_SAFE, etc > {code:java} > Policies > Ignite supports the following PartitionLossPolicies: > READ_ONLY_SAFE - all writes to a cache/table will fail with an exception. > Reads will only be allowed for entries belonging to survived/alive > partitions. Reads from lost partitions will fail with an exception. > READ_ONLY_ALL - reads are allowed from any partition including the lost ones. > An exception is thrown in an attempt to write to any partition. The result of > reading from a lost partition is undefined and may be different on different > nodes in the cluster. > READ_WRITE_SAFE - all reads and writes are allowed for
[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-11729) Low description for lost policy functional
ARomantsov created IGNITE-11729: --- Summary: Low description for lost policy functional Key: IGNITE-11729 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11729 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Improvement Components: documentation Affects Versions: 2.7 Reporter: ARomantsov Fix For: 3.0, 2.8 Current description in https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/partition-loss-policies seems not covered persistence case and text description is not clean Probably we need to transform it into two tables (in-memory, persistence) Rows - cache_write, cache_read, cache_remove,sql_read, sql_write Columns - READ_ONLY_SAFE ,READ_ONLY_ALL, READ_WRITE_SAFE, etc {code:java} Policies Ignite supports the following PartitionLossPolicies: READ_ONLY_SAFE - all writes to a cache/table will fail with an exception. Reads will only be allowed for entries belonging to survived/alive partitions. Reads from lost partitions will fail with an exception. READ_ONLY_ALL - reads are allowed from any partition including the lost ones. An exception is thrown in an attempt to write to any partition. The result of reading from a lost partition is undefined and may be different on different nodes in the cluster. READ_WRITE_SAFE - all reads and writes are allowed for entries in survived/alive partitions. All reads and writes of entries belonging to the lost partitions will fail with an exception. READ_WRITE_ALL - all reads and writes will proceed as if all partitions were in a consistent state (as if no partition loss happened). The result of reading from a lost partition is undefined and may be different on different nodes in the cluster. IGNORE - this mode never marks a lost partition as lost, pretending that no partition loss has happened and clearing the partition loss state right away. Technically, the partition will not be added to the collection of lostPartitions which is the main difference from READ_WRITE_ALL mode. IGNORE mode is used by default. {code} -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-11322) [USABILITY] Extend Node FAILED message by add consistentId if it exist
ARomantsov created IGNITE-11322: --- Summary: [USABILITY] Extend Node FAILED message by add consistentId if it exist Key: IGNITE-11322 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11322 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 2.7 Reporter: ARomantsov Fix For: 2.8 Now I having only this [GridDiscoveryManager] Node FAILED: TcpDiscoveryNode [id=f8cd73a1-8da5-4a07-b298-55634dd7c9f8, addrs=ArrayList [127.0.0.1], sockAddrs=HashSet [/127.0.0.1:47500], discPort=47500, order=1, intOrder=1, lastExchangeTime=1550141566893, loc=false, isClient=false] -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-11302) idleConnectionTimeout TcpComm different on server and client (client default > server custom) lead to wait until client timeout on server side
ARomantsov created IGNITE-11302: --- Summary: idleConnectionTimeout TcpComm different on server and client (client default > server custom) lead to wait until client timeout on server side Key: IGNITE-11302 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11302 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 2.5 Reporter: ARomantsov Fix For: 2.8 Server config: Client config Server wait until default idleConnectionTimeout (10 m) for client fail. If both config with idleConnectionTimeout=1 s - ignite worked according to config -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-11263) If host in TcpDiscoveryVmIpFinder is unreachable - server hang on start
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11263?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16763524#comment-16763524 ] ARomantsov commented on IGNITE-11263: - Finally it start [14:39:45,252][INFO][main][TcpDiscoverySpi] Successfully bound to TCP port [port=47500, localHost=0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0, locNodeId=6621cfd7-26a8-4bc0-a80a-88c6281aa118] [14:50:45,910][WARNING][snapshot-scheduler-restats-#67][SnapshotScheduleProcessor] Snapshot schedule processor awaits for cluster activation. > If host in TcpDiscoveryVmIpFinder is unreachable - server hang on start > --- > > Key: IGNITE-11263 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11263 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 2.5 >Reporter: ARomantsov >Priority: Major > Fix For: 2.8 > > > If one of servers in discovery ipFinder is unreachable - server hang on start > repeat locally with commands > sudo iptables -A INPUT DROP > sudo iptables -A OUTPUT DROP > {code:java} > > > > > > > > > > > class="org.apache.ignite.spi.discovery.tcp.ipfinder.vm.TcpDiscoveryVmIpFinder"> > > > {code} > Server logs end with > {code:java} > [14:39:44,668][INFO][main][GridCacheDatabaseSharedManager] Read checkpoint > status [startMarker=null, endMarker=null] > [14:39:44,669][INFO][main][GridCacheDatabaseSharedManager] Applying lost > cache updates since last checkpoint record [lastMarked=FileWALPointer [idx=0, > fileOff=0, len=0], lastCheckpointId=----] > [14:39:44,700][INFO][main][GridCacheDatabaseSharedManager] Finished applying > WAL changes [updatesApplied=0, time=30 ms] > [14:39:44,700][INFO][main][GridCacheDatabaseSharedManager] Restoring > partition state for local groups. > [14:39:44,705][INFO][main][GridCacheDatabaseSharedManager] Finished restoring > partition state for local groups [groupsProcessed11partitionsProcessed=0, > time=10ms] > [14:39:45,252][INFO][main][TcpDiscoverySpi] Successfully bound to TCP port > [port=47500, localHost=0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0, > locNodeId=6621cfd7-26a8-4bc0-a80a-88c6281aa118] > {code} -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Resolved] (IGNITE-11263) If host in TcpDiscoveryVmIpFinder is unreachable - server hang on start
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11263?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ARomantsov resolved IGNITE-11263. - Resolution: Invalid > If host in TcpDiscoveryVmIpFinder is unreachable - server hang on start > --- > > Key: IGNITE-11263 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11263 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 2.5 >Reporter: ARomantsov >Priority: Major > Fix For: 2.8 > > > If one of servers in discovery ipFinder is unreachable - server hang on start > repeat locally with commands > sudo iptables -A INPUT DROP > sudo iptables -A OUTPUT DROP > {code:java} > > > > > > > > > > > class="org.apache.ignite.spi.discovery.tcp.ipfinder.vm.TcpDiscoveryVmIpFinder"> > > > {code} > Server logs end with > {code:java} > [14:39:44,668][INFO][main][GridCacheDatabaseSharedManager] Read checkpoint > status [startMarker=null, endMarker=null] > [14:39:44,669][INFO][main][GridCacheDatabaseSharedManager] Applying lost > cache updates since last checkpoint record [lastMarked=FileWALPointer [idx=0, > fileOff=0, len=0], lastCheckpointId=----] > [14:39:44,700][INFO][main][GridCacheDatabaseSharedManager] Finished applying > WAL changes [updatesApplied=0, time=30 ms] > [14:39:44,700][INFO][main][GridCacheDatabaseSharedManager] Restoring > partition state for local groups. > [14:39:44,705][INFO][main][GridCacheDatabaseSharedManager] Finished restoring > partition state for local groups [groupsProcessed11partitionsProcessed=0, > time=10ms] > [14:39:45,252][INFO][main][TcpDiscoverySpi] Successfully bound to TCP port > [port=47500, localHost=0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0, > locNodeId=6621cfd7-26a8-4bc0-a80a-88c6281aa118] > {code} -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-11263) If host in TcpDiscoveryVmIpFinder is unreachable - server hang on start
ARomantsov created IGNITE-11263: --- Summary: If host in TcpDiscoveryVmIpFinder is unreachable - server hang on start Key: IGNITE-11263 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11263 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 2.5 Reporter: ARomantsov Fix For: 2.8 If one of servers in discovery ipFinder is unreachable - server hang on start repeat locally with commands sudo iptables -A INPUT DROP sudo iptables -A OUTPUT DROP {code:java} {code} Server logs end with {code:java} [14:39:44,668][INFO][main][GridCacheDatabaseSharedManager] Read checkpoint status [startMarker=null, endMarker=null] [14:39:44,669][INFO][main][GridCacheDatabaseSharedManager] Applying lost cache updates since last checkpoint record [lastMarked=FileWALPointer [idx=0, fileOff=0, len=0], lastCheckpointId=----] [14:39:44,700][INFO][main][GridCacheDatabaseSharedManager] Finished applying WAL changes [updatesApplied=0, time=30 ms] [14:39:44,700][INFO][main][GridCacheDatabaseSharedManager] Restoring partition state for local groups. [14:39:44,705][INFO][main][GridCacheDatabaseSharedManager] Finished restoring partition state for local groups [groupsProcessed11partitionsProcessed=0, time=10ms] [14:39:45,252][INFO][main][TcpDiscoverySpi] Successfully bound to TCP port [port=47500, localHost=0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0, locNodeId=6621cfd7-26a8-4bc0-a80a-88c6281aa118] {code} -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-11153) Support Java 11 for control.sh & ignitevisorcmd.sh: remove odd --add-modules for java.xml.bind
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11153?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16762589#comment-16762589 ] ARomantsov commented on IGNITE-11153: - Hello, thank for adding support for Java11 in utilities. I've checked changes code in bat scripts and have builded ignite from linked PR and it works correct > Support Java 11 for control.sh & ignitevisorcmd.sh: remove odd --add-modules > for java.xml.bind > -- > > Key: IGNITE-11153 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11153 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Task >Affects Versions: 2.7 >Reporter: Dmitriy Pavlov >Assignee: Peter Ivanov >Priority: Major > Fix For: 2.8 > > Time Spent: 10m > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > JAXB module was removed from Java 11. > Please adopt ignite control.sh in the same way as it is done for ignite.sh/bat > {noformat} > elif [ $version -gt 8 ] && [ $version -lt 11 ]; then > JVM_OPTS="\ > -XX:+AggressiveOpts \ > --add-exports=java.base/jdk.internal.misc=ALL-UNNAMED \ > --add-exports=java.base/sun.nio.ch=ALL-UNNAMED \ > --add-exports=java.management/com.sun.jmx.mbeanserver=ALL-UNNAMED \ > --add-exports=jdk.internal.jvmstat/sun.jvmstat.monitor=ALL-UNNAMED \ > > --add-exports=java.base/sun.reflect.generics.reflectiveObjects=ALL-UNNAMED \ > --illegal-access=permit \ > --add-modules=java.transaction \ > --add-modules=java.xml.bind \ > ${JVM_OPTS}" > elif [ $version -eq 11 ] ; then > JVM_OPTS="\ > --add-exports=java.base/jdk.internal.misc=ALL-UNNAMED \ > --add-exports=java.base/sun.nio.ch=ALL-UNNAMED \ > --add-exports=java.management/com.sun.jmx.mbeanserver=ALL-UNNAMED \ > --add-exports=jdk.internal.jvmstat/sun.jvmstat.monitor=ALL-UNNAMED \ > > --add-exports=java.base/sun.reflect.generics.reflectiveObjects=ALL-UNNAMED \ > --illegal-access=permit \ > ${JVM_OPTS}" > {noformat} > But control.sh for master still declares --add-modules java.xml.bind \ > {noformat} > JVM_OPTS="--add-exports java.base/jdk.internal.misc=ALL-UNNAMED \ > --add-exports java.base/sun.nio.ch=ALL-UNNAMED \ > --add-exports java.management/com.sun.jmx.mbeanserver=ALL-UNNAMED \ > --add-exports jdk.internal.jvmstat/sun.jvmstat.monitor=ALL-UNNAMED \ > --add-modules java.xml.bind \ > ${JVM_OPTS}" > {noformat} -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-11243) Not working control.sh / control.bat in master NPE in output
ARomantsov created IGNITE-11243: --- Summary: Not working control.sh / control.bat in master NPE in output Key: IGNITE-11243 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11243 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 2.8 Reporter: ARomantsov Fix For: 2.8 ./bin/control.sh --host --port --baseline Cluster state: active Error: java.lang.NullPointerException control.bat --host --port --baseline Cluster state: active Error: java.lang.NullPointerException Press any key to continue . . . -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-11243) Not working control.sh / control.bat in master NPE in output
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11243?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ARomantsov updated IGNITE-11243: Description: ./bin/control.sh --host --port --baseline Cluster state: active Error: java.lang.NullPointerException control.bat --host --port --baseline Cluster state: active Error: java.lang.NullPointerException Press any key to continue . . . No info in cluster logs matched with call, look like problem in utility run was: ./bin/control.sh --host --port --baseline Cluster state: active Error: java.lang.NullPointerException control.bat --host --port --baseline Cluster state: active Error: java.lang.NullPointerException Press any key to continue . . . > Not working control.sh / control.bat in master NPE in output > > > Key: IGNITE-11243 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11243 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 2.8 >Reporter: ARomantsov >Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 2.8 > > > ./bin/control.sh --host --port --baseline > Cluster state: active > Error: java.lang.NullPointerException > control.bat --host --port --baseline > Cluster state: active > Error: java.lang.NullPointerException > Press any key to continue . . . > No info in cluster logs matched with call, look like problem in utility run -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-11217) After cluster kill and restart with new jvm option - one of node fail with failure type - Failed to read WAL record at position
ARomantsov created IGNITE-11217: --- Summary: After cluster kill and restart with new jvm option - one of node fail with failure type - Failed to read WAL record at position Key: IGNITE-11217 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11217 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Bug Components: data structures Affects Versions: 2.7 Reporter: ARomantsov Fix For: 2.8 Test scenario: - Start two server load - execute operations (put/put-all/streamer/remove) - execute client that collect checksum - kill nodes - add JVM options to server - DIGNITE_WAL_LOG_TX_RECORDS=true, DIGNITE_RECOVERY_VERBOSE_LOGGING - start nodes - activate them Found that one node fail {code:java} [23:16:06,230][INFO][main][GridCacheProcessor] Finished restoring partition state for local groups [groupsProcessed=45, partitionsProcessed=764, time=557ms] [23:16:06,280][INFO][main][FileWriteAheadLogManager] Stopping WAL iteration due to an exception: Failed to read WAL record at position: 27700852 size: 67108864, ptr=FileWALPointer [idx=0, fileOff=27700852, len=0] [23:16:06,298][SEVERE][main][IgniteKernal] Exception during start processors, node will be stopped and close connections class org.apache.ignite.IgniteCheckedException: Failed to read WAL record at position: 27700852 size: 67108864 at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.AbstractWalRecordsIterator.handleRecordException(AbstractWalRecordsIterator.java:305) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.FileWriteAheadLogManager$RecordsIterator.handleRecordException(FileWriteAheadLogManager.java:2691) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.AbstractWalRecordsIterator.advanceRecord(AbstractWalRecordsIterator.java:269) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.AbstractWalRecordsIterator.advance(AbstractWalRecordsIterator.java:158) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.AbstractWalRecordsIterator.onNext(AbstractWalRecordsIterator.java:127) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.AbstractWalRecordsIterator.onNext(AbstractWalRecordsIterator.java:53) at org.apache.ignite.internal.util.GridCloseableIteratorAdapter.nextX(GridCloseableIteratorAdapter.java:41) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.GridCacheDatabaseSharedManager.tailPointer(GridCacheDatabaseSharedManager.java:1984) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.GridCacheDatabaseSharedManager.startMemoryRestore(GridCacheDatabaseSharedManager.java:1958) at org.apache.ignite.internal.IgniteKernal.start(IgniteKernal.java:1050) at org.apache.ignite.internal.IgnitionEx$IgniteNamedInstance.start0(IgnitionEx.java:2040) at org.apache.ignite.internal.IgnitionEx$IgniteNamedInstance.start(IgnitionEx.java:1732) at org.apache.ignite.internal.IgnitionEx.start0(IgnitionEx.java:1158) at org.apache.ignite.internal.IgnitionEx.startConfigurations(IgnitionEx.java:1076) at org.apache.ignite.internal.IgnitionEx.start(IgnitionEx.java:962) at org.apache.ignite.internal.IgnitionEx.start(IgnitionEx.java:861) at org.apache.ignite.internal.IgnitionEx.start(IgnitionEx.java:731) at org.apache.ignite.internal.IgnitionEx.start(IgnitionEx.java:700) at org.apache.ignite.Ignition.start(Ignition.java:348) at org.apache.ignite.startup.cmdline.CommandLineStartup.main(CommandLineStartup.java:301) Caused by: class org.apache.ignite.IgniteCheckedException: Failed to read WAL record at position: 27700852 size: 67108864 at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.serializer.RecordV1Serializer.readWithCrc(RecordV1Serializer.java:395) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.serializer.RecordV2Serializer.readRecord(RecordV2Serializer.java:236) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.AbstractWalRecordsIterator.advanceRecord(AbstractWalRecordsIterator.java:254) ... 17 more Caused by: java.io.IOException: class org.apache.ignite.IgniteCheckedException: Unsupported protocol version: 34 at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.serializer.RecordDataV1Serializer.readVersion(RecordDataV1Serializer.java:2010) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.serializer.RecordDataV2Serializer.readMvccDataEntry(RecordDataV2Serializer.java:328) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.serializer.RecordDataV2Serializer.readPlainRecord(RecordDataV2Serializer.java:162) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.serializer.RecordDataV1Serializer.readRecord(RecordDataV1Serializer.java:208) at
[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-11184) add example of ssl rest protocol on ignite
ARomantsov created IGNITE-11184: --- Summary: add example of ssl rest protocol on ignite Key: IGNITE-11184 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11184 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Bug Components: documentation Affects Versions: 2.7 Reporter: ARomantsov Fix For: 2.8 Add information about ssl Jetty configuration to ignite documentation about restApi https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/rest-api#sample-jetty-xml-configuration -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-11179) One of two nodes fail by handler with message - threadName=ttl-cleanup-worker, blockedFor=16s
ARomantsov created IGNITE-11179: --- Summary: One of two nodes fail by handler with message - threadName=ttl-cleanup-worker, blockedFor=16s Key: IGNITE-11179 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11179 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Bug Reporter: ARomantsov Start two nodes, one of them drop after Start caches in recovery mode -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-11179) One of two nodes fail by handler with message - threadName=ttl-cleanup-worker, blockedFor=16s
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11179?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ARomantsov updated IGNITE-11179: Fix Version/s: 2.8 > One of two nodes fail by handler with message - > threadName=ttl-cleanup-worker, blockedFor=16s > - > > Key: IGNITE-11179 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11179 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 2.8 >Reporter: ARomantsov >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.8 > > > Start two nodes, one of them drop after Start caches in recovery mode -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-11179) One of two nodes fail by handler with message - threadName=ttl-cleanup-worker, blockedFor=16s
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11179?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ARomantsov updated IGNITE-11179: Description: Start two nodes, one of them fail after block "start caches in recovery mode" {code:java} [12:47:57,333][SEVERE][tcp-disco-msg-worker-#2][G] Blocked system-critical thread has been detected. This can lead to cluster-wide undefined behaviour [threadName=ttl-cleanup-worker, blockedFor=16s] [12:47:57,334][WARNING][tcp-disco-msg-worker-#2][G] Thread [name="ttl-cleanup-worker-#45", id=63, state=WAITING, blockCnt=0, waitCnt=1] [12:47:57,336][SEVERE][tcp-disco-msg-worker-#2][] Critical system error detected. Will be handled accordingly to configured handler [hnd=StopNodeOrHaltFailureHandler [tryStop=false, timeout=0, super=AbstractFailureHandler [ignoredFailureTypes=UnmodifiableSet [SYSTEM_WORKER_BLOCKED, SYSTEM_CRITICAL_OPERATION_TIMEOUT]]], failureCtx=FailureContext [type=SYSTEM_WORKER_BLOCKED, err=class o.a.i.IgniteException: GridWorker [name=ttl-cleanup-worker, igniteInstanceName=null, finished=false, heartbeatTs=1549187260799]]] class org.apache.ignite.IgniteException: GridWorker [name=ttl-cleanup-worker, igniteInstanceName=null, finished=false, heartbeatTs=1549187260799] at org.apache.ignite.internal.IgnitionEx$IgniteNamedInstance$2.apply(IgnitionEx.java:1833) at org.apache.ignite.internal.IgnitionEx$IgniteNamedInstance$2.apply(IgnitionEx.java:1828) at org.apache.ignite.internal.worker.WorkersRegistry.onIdle(WorkersRegistry.java:233) at org.apache.ignite.internal.util.worker.GridWorker.onIdle(GridWorker.java:297) at org.apache.ignite.spi.discovery.tcp.ServerImpl$RingMessageWorker.lambda$new$0(ServerImpl.java:2680) at org.apache.ignite.spi.discovery.tcp.ServerImpl$MessageWorker.body(ServerImpl.java:7218) at org.apache.ignite.spi.discovery.tcp.ServerImpl$RingMessageWorker.body(ServerImpl.java:2717) at org.apache.ignite.internal.util.worker.GridWorker.run(GridWorker.java:120) at org.apache.ignite.spi.discovery.tcp.ServerImpl$MessageWorkerThread.body(ServerImpl.java:7156) at org.apache.ignite.spi.IgniteSpiThread.run(IgniteSpiThread.java:62) {code} was: Start two nodes, one of them drop after Start caches in recovery mode {code:java} [12:47:57,333][SEVERE][tcp-disco-msg-worker-#2][G] Blocked system-critical thread has been detected. This can lead to cluster-wide undefined behaviour [threadName=ttl-cleanup-worker, blockedFor=16s] [12:47:57,334][WARNING][tcp-disco-msg-worker-#2][G] Thread [name="ttl-cleanup-worker-#45", id=63, state=WAITING, blockCnt=0, waitCnt=1] [12:47:57,336][SEVERE][tcp-disco-msg-worker-#2][] Critical system error detected. Will be handled accordingly to configured handler [hnd=StopNodeOrHaltFailureHandler [tryStop=false, timeout=0, super=AbstractFailureHandler [ignoredFailureTypes=UnmodifiableSet [SYSTEM_WORKER_BLOCKED, SYSTEM_CRITICAL_OPERATION_TIMEOUT]]], failureCtx=FailureContext [type=SYSTEM_WORKER_BLOCKED, err=class o.a.i.IgniteException: GridWorker [name=ttl-cleanup-worker, igniteInstanceName=null, finished=false, heartbeatTs=1549187260799]]] class org.apache.ignite.IgniteException: GridWorker [name=ttl-cleanup-worker, igniteInstanceName=null, finished=false, heartbeatTs=1549187260799] at org.apache.ignite.internal.IgnitionEx$IgniteNamedInstance$2.apply(IgnitionEx.java:1833) at org.apache.ignite.internal.IgnitionEx$IgniteNamedInstance$2.apply(IgnitionEx.java:1828) at org.apache.ignite.internal.worker.WorkersRegistry.onIdle(WorkersRegistry.java:233) at org.apache.ignite.internal.util.worker.GridWorker.onIdle(GridWorker.java:297) at org.apache.ignite.spi.discovery.tcp.ServerImpl$RingMessageWorker.lambda$new$0(ServerImpl.java:2680) at org.apache.ignite.spi.discovery.tcp.ServerImpl$MessageWorker.body(ServerImpl.java:7218) at org.apache.ignite.spi.discovery.tcp.ServerImpl$RingMessageWorker.body(ServerImpl.java:2717) at org.apache.ignite.internal.util.worker.GridWorker.run(GridWorker.java:120) at org.apache.ignite.spi.discovery.tcp.ServerImpl$MessageWorkerThread.body(ServerImpl.java:7156) at org.apache.ignite.spi.IgniteSpiThread.run(IgniteSpiThread.java:62) {code} > One of two nodes fail by handler with message - > threadName=ttl-cleanup-worker, blockedFor=16s > - > > Key: IGNITE-11179 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11179 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Bug > Components: data structures >Affects Versions: 2.8 >Reporter: ARomantsov >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.8 > > > Start two nodes, one of them fail after block "start caches in recovery mode" >
[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-11179) One of two nodes fail by handler with message - threadName=ttl-cleanup-worker, blockedFor=16s
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11179?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ARomantsov updated IGNITE-11179: Description: Start two nodes, one of them drop after Start caches in recovery mode {code:java} [12:47:57,333][SEVERE][tcp-disco-msg-worker-#2][G] Blocked system-critical thread has been detected. This can lead to cluster-wide undefined behaviour [threadName=ttl-cleanup-worker, blockedFor=16s] [12:47:57,334][WARNING][tcp-disco-msg-worker-#2][G] Thread [name="ttl-cleanup-worker-#45", id=63, state=WAITING, blockCnt=0, waitCnt=1] [12:47:57,336][SEVERE][tcp-disco-msg-worker-#2][] Critical system error detected. Will be handled accordingly to configured handler [hnd=StopNodeOrHaltFailureHandler [tryStop=false, timeout=0, super=AbstractFailureHandler [ignoredFailureTypes=UnmodifiableSet [SYSTEM_WORKER_BLOCKED, SYSTEM_CRITICAL_OPERATION_TIMEOUT]]], failureCtx=FailureContext [type=SYSTEM_WORKER_BLOCKED, err=class o.a.i.IgniteException: GridWorker [name=ttl-cleanup-worker, igniteInstanceName=null, finished=false, heartbeatTs=1549187260799]]] class org.apache.ignite.IgniteException: GridWorker [name=ttl-cleanup-worker, igniteInstanceName=null, finished=false, heartbeatTs=1549187260799] at org.apache.ignite.internal.IgnitionEx$IgniteNamedInstance$2.apply(IgnitionEx.java:1833) at org.apache.ignite.internal.IgnitionEx$IgniteNamedInstance$2.apply(IgnitionEx.java:1828) at org.apache.ignite.internal.worker.WorkersRegistry.onIdle(WorkersRegistry.java:233) at org.apache.ignite.internal.util.worker.GridWorker.onIdle(GridWorker.java:297) at org.apache.ignite.spi.discovery.tcp.ServerImpl$RingMessageWorker.lambda$new$0(ServerImpl.java:2680) at org.apache.ignite.spi.discovery.tcp.ServerImpl$MessageWorker.body(ServerImpl.java:7218) at org.apache.ignite.spi.discovery.tcp.ServerImpl$RingMessageWorker.body(ServerImpl.java:2717) at org.apache.ignite.internal.util.worker.GridWorker.run(GridWorker.java:120) at org.apache.ignite.spi.discovery.tcp.ServerImpl$MessageWorkerThread.body(ServerImpl.java:7156) at org.apache.ignite.spi.IgniteSpiThread.run(IgniteSpiThread.java:62) {code} was:Start two nodes, one of them drop after Start caches in recovery mode > One of two nodes fail by handler with message - > threadName=ttl-cleanup-worker, blockedFor=16s > - > > Key: IGNITE-11179 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11179 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Bug > Components: data structures >Affects Versions: 2.8 >Reporter: ARomantsov >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.8 > > > Start two nodes, one of them drop after Start caches in recovery mode > {code:java} > [12:47:57,333][SEVERE][tcp-disco-msg-worker-#2][G] Blocked system-critical > thread has been detected. This can lead to cluster-wide undefined behaviour > [threadName=ttl-cleanup-worker, blockedFor=16s] > [12:47:57,334][WARNING][tcp-disco-msg-worker-#2][G] Thread > [name="ttl-cleanup-worker-#45", id=63, state=WAITING, blockCnt=0, waitCnt=1] > [12:47:57,336][SEVERE][tcp-disco-msg-worker-#2][] Critical system error > detected. Will be handled accordingly to configured handler > [hnd=StopNodeOrHaltFailureHandler [tryStop=false, timeout=0, > super=AbstractFailureHandler [ignoredFailureTypes=UnmodifiableSet > [SYSTEM_WORKER_BLOCKED, SYSTEM_CRITICAL_OPERATION_TIMEOUT]]], > failureCtx=FailureContext [type=SYSTEM_WORKER_BLOCKED, err=class > o.a.i.IgniteException: GridWorker [name=ttl-cleanup-worker, > igniteInstanceName=null, finished=false, heartbeatTs=1549187260799]]] > class org.apache.ignite.IgniteException: GridWorker [name=ttl-cleanup-worker, > igniteInstanceName=null, finished=false, heartbeatTs=1549187260799] > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.IgnitionEx$IgniteNamedInstance$2.apply(IgnitionEx.java:1833) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.IgnitionEx$IgniteNamedInstance$2.apply(IgnitionEx.java:1828) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.worker.WorkersRegistry.onIdle(WorkersRegistry.java:233) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.util.worker.GridWorker.onIdle(GridWorker.java:297) > at > org.apache.ignite.spi.discovery.tcp.ServerImpl$RingMessageWorker.lambda$new$0(ServerImpl.java:2680) > at > org.apache.ignite.spi.discovery.tcp.ServerImpl$MessageWorker.body(ServerImpl.java:7218) > at > org.apache.ignite.spi.discovery.tcp.ServerImpl$RingMessageWorker.body(ServerImpl.java:2717) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.util.worker.GridWorker.run(GridWorker.java:120) > at > org.apache.ignite.spi.discovery.tcp.ServerImpl$MessageWorkerThread.body(ServerImpl.java:7156) > at
[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-11179) One of two nodes fail by handler with message - threadName=ttl-cleanup-worker, blockedFor=16s
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11179?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ARomantsov updated IGNITE-11179: Affects Version/s: 2.8 > One of two nodes fail by handler with message - > threadName=ttl-cleanup-worker, blockedFor=16s > - > > Key: IGNITE-11179 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11179 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 2.8 >Reporter: ARomantsov >Priority: Critical > > Start two nodes, one of them drop after Start caches in recovery mode -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-11179) One of two nodes fail by handler with message - threadName=ttl-cleanup-worker, blockedFor=16s
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11179?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ARomantsov updated IGNITE-11179: Component/s: data structures > One of two nodes fail by handler with message - > threadName=ttl-cleanup-worker, blockedFor=16s > - > > Key: IGNITE-11179 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11179 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Bug > Components: data structures >Affects Versions: 2.8 >Reporter: ARomantsov >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.8 > > > Start two nodes, one of them drop after Start caches in recovery mode -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-11103) "Control utility --cache idle_verify --dump --cache-filter ALL" comand result doesn't contain ignite-sys-cache group
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ARomantsov updated IGNITE-11103: Fix Version/s: 2.8 > "Control utility --cache idle_verify --dump --cache-filter ALL" comand result > doesn't contain ignite-sys-cache group > > > Key: IGNITE-11103 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11103 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 2.8 >Reporter: ARomantsov >Priority: Major > Fix For: 2.8 > > > Look at functional add in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9980 > and find that issue -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-11103) "Control utility --cache idle_verify --dump --cache-filter ALL" comand result doesn't contain ignite-sys-cache group
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ARomantsov updated IGNITE-11103: Affects Version/s: 2.8 > "Control utility --cache idle_verify --dump --cache-filter ALL" comand result > doesn't contain ignite-sys-cache group > > > Key: IGNITE-11103 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11103 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 2.8 >Reporter: ARomantsov >Priority: Major > > Look at functional add in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9980 > and find that issue -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-11103) "Control utility --cache idle_verify --dump --cache-filter ALL" comand result doesn't contain ignite-sys-cache group
ARomantsov created IGNITE-11103: --- Summary: "Control utility --cache idle_verify --dump --cache-filter ALL" comand result doesn't contain ignite-sys-cache group Key: IGNITE-11103 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11103 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Bug Reporter: ARomantsov Look at functional add in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9980 and find that issue -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-10975) when ssl not correct configurate make cu error more undestandable
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10975?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ARomantsov updated IGNITE-10975: Affects Version/s: 2.5 > when ssl not correct configurate make cu error more undestandable > - > > Key: IGNITE-10975 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10975 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 2.5 >Reporter: ARomantsov >Priority: Major > > Now CU return > Connection to cluster failed. > Error: Latest topology update failed > this error also appear when you try to connect on unexist cluster , at that > point gain it with bad ssl that add little bit confusion -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-10975) when ssl not correct configurate make cu error more undestandable
ARomantsov created IGNITE-10975: --- Summary: when ssl not correct configurate make cu error more undestandable Key: IGNITE-10975 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10975 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Bug Reporter: ARomantsov Now CU return Connection to cluster failed. Error: Latest topology update failed this error also appear when you try to connect on unexist cluster , at that point gain it with bad ssl that add little bit confusion -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-10975) when ssl not correct configurate make cu error more undestandable
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10975?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ARomantsov updated IGNITE-10975: Fix Version/s: 2.8 > when ssl not correct configurate make cu error more undestandable > - > > Key: IGNITE-10975 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10975 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 2.5 >Reporter: ARomantsov >Priority: Major > Fix For: 2.8 > > > Now CU return > Connection to cluster failed. > Error: Latest topology update failed > this error also appear when you try to connect on unexist cluster , at that > point gain it with bad ssl that add little bit confusion -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-10938) After restart cluster with non-blt nodes - they left by handler
ARomantsov created IGNITE-10938: --- Summary: After restart cluster with non-blt nodes - they left by handler Key: IGNITE-10938 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10938 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Bug Components: data structures Affects Versions: 2.8 Reporter: ARomantsov Fix For: 2.8 I have cluster wherein topology contain blt and non-blt nodes, but after restart - nodes left by handler java.lang.IllegalStateException: Unable to find consistentId by UUID -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-10929) After huge load on cluster and restart with walCompactionEnabled=True warning on log
ARomantsov created IGNITE-10929: --- Summary: After huge load on cluster and restart with walCompactionEnabled=True warning on log Key: IGNITE-10929 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10929 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 2.5 Reporter: ARomantsov Fix For: 2.8 {code:java} [15:08:14,610][WARNING][wal-file-compressor-%null%-3-#70][FileWriteAheadLogManager] Failed to remove obsolete WAL segment (make sure the process has enough rights): my_path/work/db/wal/archive/node_1_1/0001.wal, exists: false [15:08:15,661][WARNING][wal-file-compressor-%null%-0-#66][FileWriteAheadLogManager] Failed to remove obsolete WAL segment (make sure the process has enough rights): my_path/work/db/wal/archive/node_1_1/0005.wal, exists: false [15:08:16,540][WARNING][wal-file-compressor-%null%-2-#69][FileWriteAheadLogManager] Failed to remove obsolete WAL segment (make sure the process has enough rights): my_path/work/db/wal/archive/node_1_1/0009.wal, exists: false [15:08:17,354][WARNING][wal-file-compressor-%null%-1-#68][FileWriteAheadLogManager] Failed to remove obsolete WAL segment (make sure the process has enough rights): my_path/work/db/wal/archive/node_1_1/0013.wal, exists: false [15:08:18,161][WARNING][wal-file-compressor-%null%-1-#68][FileWriteAheadLogManager] Failed to remove obsolete WAL segment (make sure the process has enough rights): my_path/work/db/wal/archive/node_1_1/0017.wal, exists: false [15:08:18,161][WARNING][wal-file-compressor-%null%-2-#69][FileWriteAheadLogManager] Failed to remove obsolete WAL segment (make sure the process has enough rights): my_path/work/db/wal/archive/node_1_1/0017.wal, exists: false [15:08:18,161][WARNING][wal-file-compressor-%null%-2-#69][FileWriteAheadLogManager] Failed to remove obsolete WAL segment (make sure the process has enough rights): my_path/work/db/wal/archive/node_1_1/0018.wal, exists: false [15:08:18,987][WARNING][wal-file-compressor-%null%-3-#70][FileWriteAheadLogManager] Failed to remove obsolete WAL segment (make sure the process has enough rights): my_path/work/db/wal/archive/node_1_1/0020.wal, exists: false [15:08:18,987][WARNING][wal-file-compressor-%null%-2-#69][FileWriteAheadLogManager] Failed to remove obsolete WAL segment (make sure the process has enough rights): my_path/work/db/wal/archive/node_1_1/0020.wal, exists: false [15:08:18,998][WARNING][wal-file-compressor-%null%-2-#69][FileWriteAheadLogManager] Failed to remove obsolete WAL segment (make sure the process has enough rights): my_path/work/db/wal/archive/node_1_1/0023.wal, exists: false [15:08:23,211][WARNING][wal-file-compressor-%null%-2-#69][FileWriteAheadLogManager] Failed to remove obsolete WAL segment (make sure the process has enough rights): my_path/work/db/wal/archive/node_1_1/0028.wal, exists: false [15:08:23,211][WARNING][wal-file-compressor-%null%-3-#70][FileWriteAheadLogManager] Failed to remove obsolete WAL segment (make sure the process has enough rights): my_path/work/db/wal/archive/node_1_1/0029.wal, exists: false [15:08:24,264][WARNING][wal-file-compressor-%null%-0-#66][FileWriteAheadLogManager] Failed to remove obsolete WAL segment (make sure the process has enough rights): my_path/work/db/wal/archive/node_1_1/0033.wal, exists: false {code} -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-10928) After huge load on cluster and restart with walCompactionEnabled=True errors on log
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10928?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ARomantsov updated IGNITE-10928: Affects Version/s: 2.5 > After huge load on cluster and restart with walCompactionEnabled=True errors > on log > --- > > Key: IGNITE-10928 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10928 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 2.5 >Reporter: ARomantsov >Priority: Critical > > {code:java} > > class="org.apache.ignite.configuration.DataRegionConfiguration"> > > > > > > {code} > {code:java} > [15:30:56,809][INFO][wal-file-compressor-%null%-1-#68][FileWriteAheadLogManager] > Stopping WAL iteration due to an exception: Failed to read WAL record at > position: 28310114 size: -1, ptr=FileWALPointer [idx=35, fileOff=28310114, > len=0] > [15:30:56,811][INFO][wal-file-compressor-%null%-3-#70][FileWriteAheadLogManager] > Stopping WAL iteration due to an exception: Failed to read WAL record at > position: 28303753 size: -1, ptr=FileWALPointer [idx=36, fileOff=28303753, > len=0] > [15:30:56,811][SEVERE][wal-file-compressor-%null%-1-#68][FileWriteAheadLogManager] > Compression of WAL segment [idx=35] was skipped due to unexpected error > class org.apache.ignite.IgniteCheckedException: Failed to read WAL record at > position: 28310114 size: -1 > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.AbstractWalRecordsIterator.handleRecordException(AbstractWalRecordsIterator.java:292) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.AbstractWalRecordsIterator.advanceRecord(AbstractWalRecordsIterator.java:258) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.AbstractWalRecordsIterator.advance(AbstractWalRecordsIterator.java:154) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.SingleSegmentLogicalRecordsIterator.advance(SingleSegmentLogicalRecordsIterator.java:119) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.AbstractWalRecordsIterator.onNext(AbstractWalRecordsIterator.java:123) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.AbstractWalRecordsIterator.onNext(AbstractWalRecordsIterator.java:52) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.util.GridCloseableIteratorAdapter.nextX(GridCloseableIteratorAdapter.java:41) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.FileWriteAheadLogManager$FileCompressorWorker.compressSegmentToFile(FileWriteAheadLogManager.java:2039) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.FileWriteAheadLogManager$FileCompressorWorker.body0(FileWriteAheadLogManager.java:1974) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.FileWriteAheadLogManager$FileCompressorWorker.body(FileWriteAheadLogManager.java:1950) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.util.worker.GridWorker.run(GridWorker.java:110) > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) > Caused by: class org.apache.ignite.IgniteCheckedException: Failed to read WAL > record at position: 28310114 size: -1 > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.serializer.RecordV1Serializer.readWithCrc(RecordV1Serializer.java:394) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.serializer.RecordV2Serializer.readRecord(RecordV2Serializer.java:235) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.AbstractWalRecordsIterator.advanceRecord(AbstractWalRecordsIterator.java:243) > ... 10 more > Caused by: java.nio.channels.ClosedByInterruptException > at > java.nio.channels.spi.AbstractInterruptibleChannel.end(AbstractInterruptibleChannel.java:202) > at sun.nio.ch.FileChannelImpl.read(FileChannelImpl.java:164) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.file.RandomAccessFileIO.read(RandomAccessFileIO.java:58) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.file.FileIODecorator.read(FileIODecorator.java:51) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.io.SimpleFileInput.ensure(SimpleFileInput.java:119) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.io.FileInput$Crc32CheckingFileInput.ensure(FileInput.java:89) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.io.FileInput$Crc32CheckingFileInput.readFully(FileInput.java:152) > at >
[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-10928) After huge load on cluster and restart with walCompactionEnabled=True errors on log
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10928?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ARomantsov updated IGNITE-10928: Component/s: data structures > After huge load on cluster and restart with walCompactionEnabled=True errors > on log > --- > > Key: IGNITE-10928 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10928 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Bug > Components: data structures >Affects Versions: 2.5 >Reporter: ARomantsov >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.8 > > > {code:java} > > class="org.apache.ignite.configuration.DataRegionConfiguration"> > > > > > > {code} > {code:java} > [15:30:56,809][INFO][wal-file-compressor-%null%-1-#68][FileWriteAheadLogManager] > Stopping WAL iteration due to an exception: Failed to read WAL record at > position: 28310114 size: -1, ptr=FileWALPointer [idx=35, fileOff=28310114, > len=0] > [15:30:56,811][INFO][wal-file-compressor-%null%-3-#70][FileWriteAheadLogManager] > Stopping WAL iteration due to an exception: Failed to read WAL record at > position: 28303753 size: -1, ptr=FileWALPointer [idx=36, fileOff=28303753, > len=0] > [15:30:56,811][SEVERE][wal-file-compressor-%null%-1-#68][FileWriteAheadLogManager] > Compression of WAL segment [idx=35] was skipped due to unexpected error > class org.apache.ignite.IgniteCheckedException: Failed to read WAL record at > position: 28310114 size: -1 > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.AbstractWalRecordsIterator.handleRecordException(AbstractWalRecordsIterator.java:292) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.AbstractWalRecordsIterator.advanceRecord(AbstractWalRecordsIterator.java:258) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.AbstractWalRecordsIterator.advance(AbstractWalRecordsIterator.java:154) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.SingleSegmentLogicalRecordsIterator.advance(SingleSegmentLogicalRecordsIterator.java:119) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.AbstractWalRecordsIterator.onNext(AbstractWalRecordsIterator.java:123) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.AbstractWalRecordsIterator.onNext(AbstractWalRecordsIterator.java:52) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.util.GridCloseableIteratorAdapter.nextX(GridCloseableIteratorAdapter.java:41) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.FileWriteAheadLogManager$FileCompressorWorker.compressSegmentToFile(FileWriteAheadLogManager.java:2039) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.FileWriteAheadLogManager$FileCompressorWorker.body0(FileWriteAheadLogManager.java:1974) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.FileWriteAheadLogManager$FileCompressorWorker.body(FileWriteAheadLogManager.java:1950) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.util.worker.GridWorker.run(GridWorker.java:110) > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) > Caused by: class org.apache.ignite.IgniteCheckedException: Failed to read WAL > record at position: 28310114 size: -1 > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.serializer.RecordV1Serializer.readWithCrc(RecordV1Serializer.java:394) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.serializer.RecordV2Serializer.readRecord(RecordV2Serializer.java:235) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.AbstractWalRecordsIterator.advanceRecord(AbstractWalRecordsIterator.java:243) > ... 10 more > Caused by: java.nio.channels.ClosedByInterruptException > at > java.nio.channels.spi.AbstractInterruptibleChannel.end(AbstractInterruptibleChannel.java:202) > at sun.nio.ch.FileChannelImpl.read(FileChannelImpl.java:164) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.file.RandomAccessFileIO.read(RandomAccessFileIO.java:58) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.file.FileIODecorator.read(FileIODecorator.java:51) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.io.SimpleFileInput.ensure(SimpleFileInput.java:119) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.io.FileInput$Crc32CheckingFileInput.ensure(FileInput.java:89) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.io.FileInput$Crc32CheckingFileInput.readFully(FileInput.java:152) > at >
[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-10928) After huge load on cluster and restart with walCompactionEnabled=True errors on log
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10928?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ARomantsov updated IGNITE-10928: Fix Version/s: 2.8 > After huge load on cluster and restart with walCompactionEnabled=True errors > on log > --- > > Key: IGNITE-10928 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10928 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 2.5 >Reporter: ARomantsov >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.8 > > > {code:java} > > class="org.apache.ignite.configuration.DataRegionConfiguration"> > > > > > > {code} > {code:java} > [15:30:56,809][INFO][wal-file-compressor-%null%-1-#68][FileWriteAheadLogManager] > Stopping WAL iteration due to an exception: Failed to read WAL record at > position: 28310114 size: -1, ptr=FileWALPointer [idx=35, fileOff=28310114, > len=0] > [15:30:56,811][INFO][wal-file-compressor-%null%-3-#70][FileWriteAheadLogManager] > Stopping WAL iteration due to an exception: Failed to read WAL record at > position: 28303753 size: -1, ptr=FileWALPointer [idx=36, fileOff=28303753, > len=0] > [15:30:56,811][SEVERE][wal-file-compressor-%null%-1-#68][FileWriteAheadLogManager] > Compression of WAL segment [idx=35] was skipped due to unexpected error > class org.apache.ignite.IgniteCheckedException: Failed to read WAL record at > position: 28310114 size: -1 > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.AbstractWalRecordsIterator.handleRecordException(AbstractWalRecordsIterator.java:292) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.AbstractWalRecordsIterator.advanceRecord(AbstractWalRecordsIterator.java:258) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.AbstractWalRecordsIterator.advance(AbstractWalRecordsIterator.java:154) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.SingleSegmentLogicalRecordsIterator.advance(SingleSegmentLogicalRecordsIterator.java:119) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.AbstractWalRecordsIterator.onNext(AbstractWalRecordsIterator.java:123) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.AbstractWalRecordsIterator.onNext(AbstractWalRecordsIterator.java:52) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.util.GridCloseableIteratorAdapter.nextX(GridCloseableIteratorAdapter.java:41) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.FileWriteAheadLogManager$FileCompressorWorker.compressSegmentToFile(FileWriteAheadLogManager.java:2039) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.FileWriteAheadLogManager$FileCompressorWorker.body0(FileWriteAheadLogManager.java:1974) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.FileWriteAheadLogManager$FileCompressorWorker.body(FileWriteAheadLogManager.java:1950) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.util.worker.GridWorker.run(GridWorker.java:110) > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) > Caused by: class org.apache.ignite.IgniteCheckedException: Failed to read WAL > record at position: 28310114 size: -1 > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.serializer.RecordV1Serializer.readWithCrc(RecordV1Serializer.java:394) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.serializer.RecordV2Serializer.readRecord(RecordV2Serializer.java:235) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.AbstractWalRecordsIterator.advanceRecord(AbstractWalRecordsIterator.java:243) > ... 10 more > Caused by: java.nio.channels.ClosedByInterruptException > at > java.nio.channels.spi.AbstractInterruptibleChannel.end(AbstractInterruptibleChannel.java:202) > at sun.nio.ch.FileChannelImpl.read(FileChannelImpl.java:164) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.file.RandomAccessFileIO.read(RandomAccessFileIO.java:58) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.file.FileIODecorator.read(FileIODecorator.java:51) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.io.SimpleFileInput.ensure(SimpleFileInput.java:119) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.io.FileInput$Crc32CheckingFileInput.ensure(FileInput.java:89) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.io.FileInput$Crc32CheckingFileInput.readFully(FileInput.java:152) > at >
[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-10928) After huge load on cluster and restart with walCompactionEnabled=True errors on log
ARomantsov created IGNITE-10928: --- Summary: After huge load on cluster and restart with walCompactionEnabled=True errors on log Key: IGNITE-10928 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10928 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Bug Reporter: ARomantsov {code:java} {code} {code:java} [15:30:56,809][INFO][wal-file-compressor-%null%-1-#68][FileWriteAheadLogManager] Stopping WAL iteration due to an exception: Failed to read WAL record at position: 28310114 size: -1, ptr=FileWALPointer [idx=35, fileOff=28310114, len=0] [15:30:56,811][INFO][wal-file-compressor-%null%-3-#70][FileWriteAheadLogManager] Stopping WAL iteration due to an exception: Failed to read WAL record at position: 28303753 size: -1, ptr=FileWALPointer [idx=36, fileOff=28303753, len=0] [15:30:56,811][SEVERE][wal-file-compressor-%null%-1-#68][FileWriteAheadLogManager] Compression of WAL segment [idx=35] was skipped due to unexpected error class org.apache.ignite.IgniteCheckedException: Failed to read WAL record at position: 28310114 size: -1 at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.AbstractWalRecordsIterator.handleRecordException(AbstractWalRecordsIterator.java:292) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.AbstractWalRecordsIterator.advanceRecord(AbstractWalRecordsIterator.java:258) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.AbstractWalRecordsIterator.advance(AbstractWalRecordsIterator.java:154) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.SingleSegmentLogicalRecordsIterator.advance(SingleSegmentLogicalRecordsIterator.java:119) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.AbstractWalRecordsIterator.onNext(AbstractWalRecordsIterator.java:123) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.AbstractWalRecordsIterator.onNext(AbstractWalRecordsIterator.java:52) at org.apache.ignite.internal.util.GridCloseableIteratorAdapter.nextX(GridCloseableIteratorAdapter.java:41) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.FileWriteAheadLogManager$FileCompressorWorker.compressSegmentToFile(FileWriteAheadLogManager.java:2039) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.FileWriteAheadLogManager$FileCompressorWorker.body0(FileWriteAheadLogManager.java:1974) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.FileWriteAheadLogManager$FileCompressorWorker.body(FileWriteAheadLogManager.java:1950) at org.apache.ignite.internal.util.worker.GridWorker.run(GridWorker.java:110) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) Caused by: class org.apache.ignite.IgniteCheckedException: Failed to read WAL record at position: 28310114 size: -1 at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.serializer.RecordV1Serializer.readWithCrc(RecordV1Serializer.java:394) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.serializer.RecordV2Serializer.readRecord(RecordV2Serializer.java:235) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.AbstractWalRecordsIterator.advanceRecord(AbstractWalRecordsIterator.java:243) ... 10 more Caused by: java.nio.channels.ClosedByInterruptException at java.nio.channels.spi.AbstractInterruptibleChannel.end(AbstractInterruptibleChannel.java:202) at sun.nio.ch.FileChannelImpl.read(FileChannelImpl.java:164) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.file.RandomAccessFileIO.read(RandomAccessFileIO.java:58) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.file.FileIODecorator.read(FileIODecorator.java:51) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.io.SimpleFileInput.ensure(SimpleFileInput.java:119) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.io.FileInput$Crc32CheckingFileInput.ensure(FileInput.java:89) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.io.FileInput$Crc32CheckingFileInput.readFully(FileInput.java:152) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.serializer.RecordV2Serializer$2.readWithHeaders(RecordV2Serializer.java:149) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.serializer.RecordV1Serializer.readWithCrc(RecordV1Serializer.java:373) ... 12 more Suppressed: class org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.crc.IgniteDataIntegrityViolationException: val: 1241861030 writtenCrc: 20736 at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.io.FileInput$Crc32CheckingFileInput.close(FileInput.java:106)
[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-10928) After huge load on cluster and restart with walCompactionEnabled=True errors on log
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10928?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ARomantsov updated IGNITE-10928: Priority: Critical (was: Major) > After huge load on cluster and restart with walCompactionEnabled=True errors > on log > --- > > Key: IGNITE-10928 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10928 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Bug >Reporter: ARomantsov >Priority: Critical > > {code:java} > > class="org.apache.ignite.configuration.DataRegionConfiguration"> > > > > > > {code} > {code:java} > [15:30:56,809][INFO][wal-file-compressor-%null%-1-#68][FileWriteAheadLogManager] > Stopping WAL iteration due to an exception: Failed to read WAL record at > position: 28310114 size: -1, ptr=FileWALPointer [idx=35, fileOff=28310114, > len=0] > [15:30:56,811][INFO][wal-file-compressor-%null%-3-#70][FileWriteAheadLogManager] > Stopping WAL iteration due to an exception: Failed to read WAL record at > position: 28303753 size: -1, ptr=FileWALPointer [idx=36, fileOff=28303753, > len=0] > [15:30:56,811][SEVERE][wal-file-compressor-%null%-1-#68][FileWriteAheadLogManager] > Compression of WAL segment [idx=35] was skipped due to unexpected error > class org.apache.ignite.IgniteCheckedException: Failed to read WAL record at > position: 28310114 size: -1 > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.AbstractWalRecordsIterator.handleRecordException(AbstractWalRecordsIterator.java:292) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.AbstractWalRecordsIterator.advanceRecord(AbstractWalRecordsIterator.java:258) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.AbstractWalRecordsIterator.advance(AbstractWalRecordsIterator.java:154) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.SingleSegmentLogicalRecordsIterator.advance(SingleSegmentLogicalRecordsIterator.java:119) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.AbstractWalRecordsIterator.onNext(AbstractWalRecordsIterator.java:123) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.AbstractWalRecordsIterator.onNext(AbstractWalRecordsIterator.java:52) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.util.GridCloseableIteratorAdapter.nextX(GridCloseableIteratorAdapter.java:41) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.FileWriteAheadLogManager$FileCompressorWorker.compressSegmentToFile(FileWriteAheadLogManager.java:2039) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.FileWriteAheadLogManager$FileCompressorWorker.body0(FileWriteAheadLogManager.java:1974) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.FileWriteAheadLogManager$FileCompressorWorker.body(FileWriteAheadLogManager.java:1950) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.util.worker.GridWorker.run(GridWorker.java:110) > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) > Caused by: class org.apache.ignite.IgniteCheckedException: Failed to read WAL > record at position: 28310114 size: -1 > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.serializer.RecordV1Serializer.readWithCrc(RecordV1Serializer.java:394) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.serializer.RecordV2Serializer.readRecord(RecordV2Serializer.java:235) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.AbstractWalRecordsIterator.advanceRecord(AbstractWalRecordsIterator.java:243) > ... 10 more > Caused by: java.nio.channels.ClosedByInterruptException > at > java.nio.channels.spi.AbstractInterruptibleChannel.end(AbstractInterruptibleChannel.java:202) > at sun.nio.ch.FileChannelImpl.read(FileChannelImpl.java:164) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.file.RandomAccessFileIO.read(RandomAccessFileIO.java:58) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.file.FileIODecorator.read(FileIODecorator.java:51) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.io.SimpleFileInput.ensure(SimpleFileInput.java:119) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.io.FileInput$Crc32CheckingFileInput.ensure(FileInput.java:89) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.io.FileInput$Crc32CheckingFileInput.readFully(FileInput.java:152) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.serializer.RecordV2Serializer$2.readWithHeaders(RecordV2Serializer.java:149) >
[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-10911) Need to enforce truststore key when control utility connect to cluster with SSL enabled
ARomantsov created IGNITE-10911: --- Summary: Need to enforce truststore key when control utility connect to cluster with SSL enabled Key: IGNITE-10911 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10911 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 2.5 Reporter: ARomantsov Fix For: 2.8 I use the next setting in my app {code:java} {code} And can get the result of command - control.bat --baseline --keystore..\server.jks --keystore-password * without set up truststore -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-10896) Add ability to use more than one key with control.sh --cache idle_verify
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10896?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ARomantsov updated IGNITE-10896: Description: Now I can use only one of next options 1) --exclude-caches cache1,...,cacheN 2) --cache-filter ALL|SYSTEM|PERSISTENT|NOT_PERSISTENT 3) cache1,...,cacheN I suppose that using 1 and 2 or 2 and 3 make this command more flexiable was: Now I can use only one of next options 1) --exclude-caches cache1,...,cacheN or 2) --cache-filter ALL|SYSTEM|PERSISTENT|NOT_PERSISTENT 3) cache1,...,cacheN I suppose that using 1 and 2 or 2 and 3 make this command more flexiable > Add ability to use more than one key with control.sh --cache idle_verify > > > Key: IGNITE-10896 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10896 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: ARomantsov >Priority: Major > Fix For: 2.8 > > > Now I can use only one of next options > 1) --exclude-caches cache1,...,cacheN > 2) --cache-filter ALL|SYSTEM|PERSISTENT|NOT_PERSISTENT > 3) cache1,...,cacheN > I suppose that using 1 and 2 or 2 and 3 make this command more flexiable -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-10896) Add ability to use more than one key with control.sh --cache idle_verify
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10896?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ARomantsov updated IGNITE-10896: Fix Version/s: 2.8 > Add ability to use more than one key with control.sh --cache idle_verify > > > Key: IGNITE-10896 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10896 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: ARomantsov >Priority: Major > Fix For: 2.8 > > > Now I can use only one of next options > 1) --exclude-caches cache1,...,cacheN or > 2) --cache-filter ALL|SYSTEM|PERSISTENT|NOT_PERSISTENT > 3) cache1,...,cacheN > I suppose that using 1 and 2 or 2 and 3 make this command more flexiable -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-10896) Add ability to use more than one key with control.sh --cache idle_verify
ARomantsov created IGNITE-10896: --- Summary: Add ability to use more than one key with control.sh --cache idle_verify Key: IGNITE-10896 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10896 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: ARomantsov Now I can use only one of next options 1) --exclude-caches cache1,...,cacheN or 2) --cache-filter ALL|SYSTEM|PERSISTENT|NOT_PERSISTENT 3) cache1,...,cacheN I suppose that using 1 and 2 or 2 and 3 make this command more flexiable -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-10848) Add abbitlity to set default log directory by JVM key and set it by default to /var/log in *nix system
ARomantsov created IGNITE-10848: --- Summary: Add abbitlity to set default log directory by JVM key and set it by default to /var/log in *nix system Key: IGNITE-10848 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10848 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: ARomantsov -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-10825) After node restart and and new node to BLT due load - some partition inconsistent
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10825?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ARomantsov updated IGNITE-10825: Description: {code:java} 14:12:20 [14:12:20][:573 :252] idle_verify check has finished, found 2 conflict partitions: [counterConflicts=1, hashConflicts=1] 14:12:20 [14:12:20][:573 :252] Update counter conflicts: 14:12:20 [14:12:20][:573 :252] Conflict partition: PartitionKeyV2 [grpId=374280887, grpName=cache_group_4, partId=115] 14:12:20 [14:12:20][:573 :252] Partition instances: [PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=false, consistentId=node_1_5, updateCntr=10, size=2, partHash=-979021948], PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=true, consistentId=node_1_2, updateCntr=11, size=2, partHash=-731597536], PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=false, consistentId=node_1_1, updateCntr=11, size=2, partHash=-731597536], PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=false, consistentId=node_1_3, updateCntr=11, size=2, partHash=-731597536], PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=false, consistentId=node_1_6, updateCntr=11, size=2, partHash=-731597536], PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=false, consistentId=node_1_4, updateCntr=11, size=2, partHash=-731597536], PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=false, consistentId=node_1_10001, updateCntr=11, size=2, partHash=-731597536]] 14:12:20 [14:12:20][:573 :252] Hash conflicts: 14:12:20 [14:12:20][:573 :252] Conflict partition: PartitionKeyV2 [grpId=374280887, grpName=cache_group_4, partId=115] 14:12:20 [14:12:20][:573 :252] Partition instances: [PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=false, consistentId=node_1_5, updateCntr=10, size=2, partHash=-979021948], PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=true, consistentId=node_1_2, updateCntr=11, size=2, partHash=-731597536], PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=false, consistentId=node_1_1, updateCntr=11, size=2, partHash=-731597536], PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=false, consistentId=node_1_3, updateCntr=11, size=2, partHash=-731597536], PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=false, consistentId=node_1_6, updateCntr=11, size=2, partHash=-731597536], PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=false, consistentId=node_1_4, updateCntr=11, size=2, partHash=-731597536], PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=false, consistentId=node_1_10001, updateCntr=11, size=2, partHash=-731597536]] {code} > After node restart and and new node to BLT due load - some partition > inconsistent > - > > Key: IGNITE-10825 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10825 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Bug > Components: data structures >Affects Versions: 2.8 >Reporter: ARomantsov >Priority: Critical > > {code:java} > 14:12:20 [14:12:20][:573 :252] idle_verify check has finished, found 2 > conflict partitions: [counterConflicts=1, hashConflicts=1] > 14:12:20 [14:12:20][:573 :252] Update counter conflicts: > 14:12:20 [14:12:20][:573 :252] Conflict partition: PartitionKeyV2 > [grpId=374280887, grpName=cache_group_4, partId=115] > 14:12:20 [14:12:20][:573 :252] Partition instances: > > [PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=false, consistentId=node_1_5, > updateCntr=10, size=2, partHash=-979021948], > >PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=true, consistentId=node_1_2, > updateCntr=11, size=2, partHash=-731597536], > >
[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-10825) After node restart and and new node to BLT due load - some partition inconsistent
ARomantsov created IGNITE-10825: --- Summary: After node restart and and new node to BLT due load - some partition inconsistent Key: IGNITE-10825 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10825 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Bug Components: data structures Affects Versions: 2.8 Reporter: ARomantsov -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-10772) If version look like X.X.X.X rest version return X.X.X-X
ARomantsov created IGNITE-10772: --- Summary: If version look like X.X.X.X rest version return X.X.X-X Key: IGNITE-10772 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10772 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Bug Components: rest Affects Versions: 2.8 Reporter: ARomantsov Fix For: 2.8 Test URL - http://localhost:8080/ignite?cmd=version { "result": { "error": null, "response": "X.X.X-X", "sessionToken": "D372FC2DD4A24603AC39CC92C6B132EC", "successStatus": 0 }, "status": "OK" } -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-10744) class org.apache.ignite.IgniteCheckedException: Failed to read WAL record at position: 5237375 size: -1
ARomantsov created IGNITE-10744: --- Summary: class org.apache.ignite.IgniteCheckedException: Failed to read WAL record at position: 5237375 size: -1 Key: IGNITE-10744 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10744 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Bug Components: data structures Affects Versions: 2.8 Reporter: ARomantsov Fix For: 2.8 Scenario: -Start 4 nodes with disc storage -Little load -Deactivate -Activate Got next message in log {code:java} [20:54:42,746][INFO][wal-file-compressor-%null%-3-#70][FileWriteAheadLogManager] Stopping WAL iteration due to an exception: Failed to read WAL record at position: 5237375 size: -1, ptr=FileWALPointer [idx=4, fileOff=5237375, len=0] [20:54:42,747][SEVERE][wal-file-compressor-%null%-3-#70][FileWriteAheadLogManager] Compression of WAL segment [idx=4] was skipped due to unexpected error class org.apache.ignite.IgniteCheckedException: Failed to read WAL record at position: 5237375 size: -1 at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.AbstractWalRecordsIterator.handleRecordException(AbstractWalRecordsIterator.java:294) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.AbstractWalRecordsIterator.advanceRecord(AbstractWalRecordsIterator.java:258) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.AbstractWalRecordsIterator.advance(AbstractWalRecordsIterator.java:154) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.SingleSegmentLogicalRecordsIterator.advance(SingleSegmentLogicalRecordsIterator.java:119) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.AbstractWalRecordsIterator.onNext(AbstractWalRecordsIterator.java:123) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.AbstractWalRecordsIterator.onNext(AbstractWalRecordsIterator.java:52) at org.apache.ignite.internal.util.GridCloseableIteratorAdapter.nextX(GridCloseableIteratorAdapter.java:41) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.FileWriteAheadLogManager$FileCompressorWorker.compressSegmentToFile(FileWriteAheadLogManager.java:2186) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.FileWriteAheadLogManager$FileCompressorWorker.body0(FileWriteAheadLogManager.java:2111) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.FileWriteAheadLogManager$FileCompressorWorker.body(FileWriteAheadLogManager.java:2081) at org.apache.ignite.internal.util.worker.GridWorker.run(GridWorker.java:120) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) Caused by: class org.apache.ignite.IgniteCheckedException: Failed to read WAL record at position: 5237375 size: -1 at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.serializer.RecordV1Serializer.readWithCrc(RecordV1Serializer.java:394) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.serializer.RecordV2Serializer.readRecord(RecordV2Serializer.java:235) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.AbstractWalRecordsIterator.advanceRecord(AbstractWalRecordsIterator.java:243) ... 10 more Caused by: java.nio.channels.ClosedByInterruptException at java.nio.channels.spi.AbstractInterruptibleChannel.end(AbstractInterruptibleChannel.java:202) at sun.nio.ch.FileChannelImpl.read(FileChannelImpl.java:164) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.file.RandomAccessFileIO.read(RandomAccessFileIO.java:58) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.file.FileIODecorator.read(FileIODecorator.java:51) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.io.SimpleFileInput.ensure(SimpleFileInput.java:119) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.io.FileInput$Crc32CheckingFileInput.ensure(FileInput.java:89) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.io.FileInput$Crc32CheckingFileInput.skipBytes(FileInput.java:130) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.serializer.RecordV2Serializer$2.readWithHeaders(RecordV2Serializer.java:130) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.serializer.RecordV1Serializer.readWithCrc(RecordV1Serializer.java:373) ... 12 more Suppressed: class org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.crc.IgniteDataIntegrityViolationException: val: 505117685 writtenCrc: 0 at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.io.FileInput$Crc32CheckingFileInput.close(FileInput.java:106) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.serializer.RecordV1Serializer.readWithCrc(RecordV1Serializer.java:380) ... 12 more {code} -- This
[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-8225) Add a command to control script to print current topology version
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16724986#comment-16724986 ] ARomantsov commented on IGNITE-8225: [~ruchirc], hello Can you have any objection if i take this ticker. I'm going to do it on Friday 12/21/2018 > Add a command to control script to print current topology version > - > > Key: IGNITE-8225 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8225 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Alexey Goncharuk >Assignee: ruchir choudhry >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.8 > > > The command should be {{./control.sh --topology}} and should print a short > summary about the current topology (topology version, number of client nodes, > number of server nodes, baseline topology information) -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-10279) Control.sh utility unify options naming format
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16721367#comment-16721367 ] ARomantsov commented on IGNITE-10279: - Can you please also fix help of control.sh I suggest something like {code:java} Contol.sh is used to execute admin commands on cluster or get common cluster info. The command has the following syntax: control.sh [--host HOST_OR_IP] [--port PORT] [--user USER] [--password PASSWORD] [--ping-interval PING_INTERVAL] [--ping-timeout PING_TIMEOUT] [--ssl_enabled] [--ssl_protocol SSL_PROTOCOL[, SSL_PROTOCOL_2, ...]] [--ssl_algorithm SSL_ALGORITHM] [--ssl_cipher_suites SSL_CIPHER_1[, SSL_CIPHER_2, ...]] [--ssl_key_store_type SSL_KEY_STORE_TYPE] [--ssl_key_store_path PATH] [--ssl_key_store_password PASSWORD] [--ssl_truststore_type SSL_TRUST_STORE_TYPE] [--ssl_truststore_path PATH] [--ssl_truststore_password PASSWORD] [command] This utility can do the following commands: Activate cluster: control.sh --activate Deactivate cluster: control.sh --deactivate [--yes] Print current cluster state: control.sh --state Print cluster baseline topology: control.sh --baseline Add nodes into baseline topology: control.sh --baseline add consistentId1[,consistentId2,,consistentIdN] [--yes] Remove nodes from baseline topology: control.sh --baseline remove consistentId1[,consistentId2,,consistentIdN] [--yes] Set baseline topology: control.sh --baseline set consistentId1[,consistentId2,,consistentIdN] [--yes] Set baseline topology based on version: control.sh --baseline version topologyVersion [--yes] List or kill transactions: control.sh --tx [xid XID] [minDuration SECONDS] [minSize SIZE] [label PATTERN_REGEX] [servers|clients] [nodes consistentId1[,consistentId2,,consistentIdN]] [limit NUMBER] [order DURATION|SIZE|START_TIME] [kill] [--yes] View caches information in a cluster. For more details type: control.sh --cache help By default commands affecting the cluster require interactive confirmation. Use --yes option to disable it. Default values: HOST_OR_IP=127.0.0.1 PORT=11211 PING_INTERVAL=5000 PING_TIMEOUT=3 SSL_PROTOCOL=TLS SSL_ALGORITHM=SunX509 SSL_KEY_STORE_TYPE=JKS SSL_TRUST_STORE_TYPE=JKS Exit codes: 0 - successful execution. 1 - invalid arguments. 2 - connection failed. 3 - authentication failed. 4 - unexpected error. {code} > Control.sh utility unify options naming format > -- > > Key: IGNITE-10279 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10279 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Improvement >Affects Versions: 2.6 >Reporter: Sergey Antonov >Assignee: Sergey Antonov >Priority: Major > Fix For: 2.8 > > > Now we have options in several styles: > {noformat} > --ping-interval > {noformat} > {noformat} > --skipZeros > {noformat} > I think, we must unify options naming format and we should use linux like > format, i.e. {{--word1-word2}} > Â -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-10669) NPE in freelist.PagesList.findTailIndex
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10669?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ARomantsov updated IGNITE-10669: Description: Run node with 1 cache and put to it. Kill node and try run back - it broken on start {code:java} [22:40:10,916][INFO][main][GridCacheDatabaseSharedManager] Applying lost cache updates since last checkpoint record [lastMarked=FileWALPointer [idx=2, fileOff=14706, len=21409], lastCheckpointId=2f9202e9-c9d7-47ca-9dcc-299a959bb2e0] [22:40:10,922][SEVERE][main][IgniteKernal] Exception during start processors, node will be stopped and close connections java.lang.NullPointerException at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.freelist.PagesList.findTailIndex(PagesList.java:502) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.freelist.PagesList.updateTail(PagesList.java:458) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.freelist.PagesList.mergeNoNext(PagesList.java:1330) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.freelist.PagesList.removeDataPage(PagesList.java:1281) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.freelist.AbstractFreeList$RemoveRowHandler.run(AbstractFreeList.java:305) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.freelist.AbstractFreeList$RemoveRowHandler.run(AbstractFreeList.java:261) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.tree.util.PageHandler.writePage(PageHandler.java:279) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.DataStructure.write(DataStructure.java:256) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.freelist.AbstractFreeList.removeDataRowByLink(AbstractFreeList.java:571) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.metastorage.MetastorageRowStore.removeRow(MetastorageRowStore.java:57) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.metastorage.MetaStorage.putData(MetaStorage.java:253) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.metastorage.MetaStorage.applyUpdate(MetaStorage.java:492) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.GridCacheDatabaseSharedManager.applyLogicalUpdates(GridCacheDatabaseSharedManager.java:2420) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.GridCacheDatabaseSharedManager.startMemoryRestore(GridCacheDatabaseSharedManager.java:1909) at org.apache.ignite.internal.IgniteKernal.start(IgniteKernal.java:1056) at org.apache.ignite.internal.IgnitionEx$IgniteNamedInstance.start0(IgnitionEx.java:2040) at org.apache.ignite.internal.IgnitionEx$IgniteNamedInstance.start(IgnitionEx.java:1732) at org.apache.ignite.internal.IgnitionEx.start0(IgnitionEx.java:1158) at org.apache.ignite.internal.IgnitionEx.startConfigurations(IgnitionEx.java:1076) at org.apache.ignite.internal.IgnitionEx.start(IgnitionEx.java:962) at org.apache.ignite.internal.IgnitionEx.start(IgnitionEx.java:861) at org.apache.ignite.internal.IgnitionEx.start(IgnitionEx.java:731) at org.apache.ignite.internal.IgnitionEx.start(IgnitionEx.java:700) at org.apache.ignite.Ignition.start(Ignition.java:348) at org.apache.ignite.startup.cmdline.CommandLineStartup.main(CommandLineStartup.java:301) [22:40:10,922][SEVERE][main][IgniteKernal] Got exception while starting (will rollback startup routine). java.lang.NullPointerException at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.freelist.PagesList.findTailIndex(PagesList.java:502) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.freelist.PagesList.updateTail(PagesList.java:458) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.freelist.PagesList.mergeNoNext(PagesList.java:1330) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.freelist.PagesList.removeDataPage(PagesList.java:1281) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.freelist.AbstractFreeList$RemoveRowHandler.run(AbstractFreeList.java:305) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.freelist.AbstractFreeList$RemoveRowHandler.run(AbstractFreeList.java:261) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.tree.util.PageHandler.writePage(PageHandler.java:279) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.DataStructure.write(DataStructure.java:256) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.freelist.AbstractFreeList.removeDataRowByLink(AbstractFreeList.java:571) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.metastorage.MetastorageRowStore.removeRow(MetastorageRowStore.java:57) at
[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-10669) NPE in freelist.PagesList.findTailIndex
ARomantsov created IGNITE-10669: --- Summary: NPE in freelist.PagesList.findTailIndex Key: IGNITE-10669 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10669 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Bug Components: data structures Affects Versions: 2.7 Environment: Windows Reporter: ARomantsov Fix For: 2.8 {code:java} [22:40:10,916][INFO][main][GridCacheDatabaseSharedManager] Applying lost cache updates since last checkpoint record [lastMarked=FileWALPointer [idx=2, fileOff=14706, len=21409], lastCheckpointId=2f9202e9-c9d7-47ca-9dcc-299a959bb2e0] [22:40:10,922][SEVERE][main][IgniteKernal] Exception during start processors, node will be stopped and close connections java.lang.NullPointerException at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.freelist.PagesList.findTailIndex(PagesList.java:502) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.freelist.PagesList.updateTail(PagesList.java:458) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.freelist.PagesList.mergeNoNext(PagesList.java:1330) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.freelist.PagesList.removeDataPage(PagesList.java:1281) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.freelist.AbstractFreeList$RemoveRowHandler.run(AbstractFreeList.java:305) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.freelist.AbstractFreeList$RemoveRowHandler.run(AbstractFreeList.java:261) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.tree.util.PageHandler.writePage(PageHandler.java:279) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.DataStructure.write(DataStructure.java:256) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.freelist.AbstractFreeList.removeDataRowByLink(AbstractFreeList.java:571) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.metastorage.MetastorageRowStore.removeRow(MetastorageRowStore.java:57) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.metastorage.MetaStorage.putData(MetaStorage.java:253) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.metastorage.MetaStorage.applyUpdate(MetaStorage.java:492) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.GridCacheDatabaseSharedManager.applyLogicalUpdates(GridCacheDatabaseSharedManager.java:2420) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.GridCacheDatabaseSharedManager.startMemoryRestore(GridCacheDatabaseSharedManager.java:1909) at org.apache.ignite.internal.IgniteKernal.start(IgniteKernal.java:1056) at org.apache.ignite.internal.IgnitionEx$IgniteNamedInstance.start0(IgnitionEx.java:2040) at org.apache.ignite.internal.IgnitionEx$IgniteNamedInstance.start(IgnitionEx.java:1732) at org.apache.ignite.internal.IgnitionEx.start0(IgnitionEx.java:1158) at org.apache.ignite.internal.IgnitionEx.startConfigurations(IgnitionEx.java:1076) at org.apache.ignite.internal.IgnitionEx.start(IgnitionEx.java:962) at org.apache.ignite.internal.IgnitionEx.start(IgnitionEx.java:861) at org.apache.ignite.internal.IgnitionEx.start(IgnitionEx.java:731) at org.apache.ignite.internal.IgnitionEx.start(IgnitionEx.java:700) at org.apache.ignite.Ignition.start(Ignition.java:348) at org.apache.ignite.startup.cmdline.CommandLineStartup.main(CommandLineStartup.java:301) [22:40:10,922][SEVERE][main][IgniteKernal] Got exception while starting (will rollback startup routine). java.lang.NullPointerException at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.freelist.PagesList.findTailIndex(PagesList.java:502) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.freelist.PagesList.updateTail(PagesList.java:458) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.freelist.PagesList.mergeNoNext(PagesList.java:1330) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.freelist.PagesList.removeDataPage(PagesList.java:1281) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.freelist.AbstractFreeList$RemoveRowHandler.run(AbstractFreeList.java:305) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.freelist.AbstractFreeList$RemoveRowHandler.run(AbstractFreeList.java:261) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.tree.util.PageHandler.writePage(PageHandler.java:279) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.DataStructure.write(DataStructure.java:256) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.freelist.AbstractFreeList.removeDataRowByLink(AbstractFreeList.java:571) at
[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-10664) need to make identical the behavior of control.sh and control.bat
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ARomantsov updated IGNITE-10664: Description: Now control.bat contain next line: if not "%NO_PAUSE%" == "1" pause and after execution it wait on - Press any key to continue... on the other hand - control.sh not contain any pause to use automation with ignite the second option is better was: Now control.bat contain next line: if not "%NO_PAUSE%" == "1" pause and after execution it wait on - Press any key to continue... on the other hand - control.sh not contain any pause > need to make identical the behavior of control.sh and control.bat > -- > > Key: IGNITE-10664 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10664 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: clients >Affects Versions: 2.7 > Environment: windows, nix >Reporter: ARomantsov >Priority: Major > Fix For: 2.8 > > > Now control.bat contain next line: > if not "%NO_PAUSE%" == "1" pause > and after execution it wait on - Press any key to continue... > on the other hand - control.sh not contain any pause > to use automation with ignite the second option is better -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-10664) need to make identical the behavior of control.sh and control.bat
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ARomantsov updated IGNITE-10664: Priority: Major (was: Minor) > need to make identical the behavior of control.sh and control.bat > -- > > Key: IGNITE-10664 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10664 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: clients >Affects Versions: 2.7 > Environment: windows, nix >Reporter: ARomantsov >Priority: Major > Fix For: 2.8 > > > Now control.bat contain next line: > if not "%NO_PAUSE%" == "1" pause > and after execution it wait on - Press any key to continue... > on the other hand - control.sh not contain any pause -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-10664) need to make identical the behavior of control.sh and control.bat
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ARomantsov updated IGNITE-10664: Description: Now control.bat contain next line: if not "%NO_PAUSE%" == "1" pause and after execution it wait on - Press any key to continue... on the other hand - control.sh not contain any pause was: Now control.bat contain next line: if not "%NO_PAUSE%" == "1" pause and after execution it wait press any button. on the other hand - control.sh not contain any pause > need to make identical the behavior of control.sh and control.bat > -- > > Key: IGNITE-10664 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10664 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Bug > Components: clients >Affects Versions: 2.7 > Environment: windows, nix >Reporter: ARomantsov >Priority: Major > Fix For: 2.8 > > > Now control.bat contain next line: > if not "%NO_PAUSE%" == "1" pause > and after execution it wait on - Press any key to continue... > on the other hand - control.sh not contain any pause -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-10664) need to make identical the behavior of control.sh and control.bat
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ARomantsov updated IGNITE-10664: Priority: Minor (was: Major) > need to make identical the behavior of control.sh and control.bat > -- > > Key: IGNITE-10664 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10664 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Bug > Components: clients >Affects Versions: 2.7 > Environment: windows, nix >Reporter: ARomantsov >Priority: Minor > Fix For: 2.8 > > > Now control.bat contain next line: > if not "%NO_PAUSE%" == "1" pause > and after execution it wait on - Press any key to continue... > on the other hand - control.sh not contain any pause -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-10664) need to make identical the behavior of control.sh and control.bat
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ARomantsov updated IGNITE-10664: Issue Type: Improvement (was: Bug) > need to make identical the behavior of control.sh and control.bat > -- > > Key: IGNITE-10664 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10664 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: clients >Affects Versions: 2.7 > Environment: windows, nix >Reporter: ARomantsov >Priority: Minor > Fix For: 2.8 > > > Now control.bat contain next line: > if not "%NO_PAUSE%" == "1" pause > and after execution it wait on - Press any key to continue... > on the other hand - control.sh not contain any pause -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-10664) need to make identical the behavior of control.sh and control.bat
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ARomantsov updated IGNITE-10664: Description: Now control.bat contain next line: if not "%NO_PAUSE%" == "1" pause and after execution it wait press any button. on the other hand - control.sh not contain any pause was: Now control.bat contain next line: if not "%NO_PAUSE%" == "1" pause and after execution it ready to press button. on the other hand - control.sh not contain any pause > need to make identical the behavior of control.sh and control.bat > -- > > Key: IGNITE-10664 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10664 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Bug > Components: clients >Affects Versions: 2.7 > Environment: windows, nix >Reporter: ARomantsov >Priority: Major > Fix For: 2.8 > > > Now control.bat contain next line: > if not "%NO_PAUSE%" == "1" pause > and after execution it wait press any button. > on the other hand - control.sh not contain any pause -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-10664) need to make identical the behavior of control.sh and control.bat
ARomantsov created IGNITE-10664: --- Summary: need to make identical the behavior of control.sh and control.bat Key: IGNITE-10664 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10664 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Bug Components: clients Affects Versions: 2.7 Environment: windows, nix Reporter: ARomantsov Fix For: 2.8 Now control.bat contain next line: if not "%NO_PAUSE%" == "1" pause and after execution it ready to press button. on the other hand - control.sh not contain any pause -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Closed] (IGNITE-9356) Ignite rest command http://localhost:8080/ignite?cmd=log=n=m return more line in linux than windows
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9356?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ARomantsov closed IGNITE-9356. -- > Ignite rest command http://localhost:8080/ignite?cmd=log=n=m return > more line in linux than windows > - > > Key: IGNITE-9356 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9356 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: rest >Affects Versions: 2.5 > Environment: Centos/ Windows10 >Reporter: ARomantsov >Priority: Minor > Fix For: 2.8 > > > I run cluster in diffrent configuration (centos and windows 10) and notice > that log command return diffrent count of rows in same from and to > Windows rest return 1 less rows -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-9356) Ignite rest command http://localhost:8080/ignite?cmd=log=n=m return more line in linux than windows
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9356?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ARomantsov updated IGNITE-9356: --- Ignite Flags: (was: Docs Required) > Ignite rest command http://localhost:8080/ignite?cmd=log=n=m return > more line in linux than windows > - > > Key: IGNITE-9356 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9356 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: rest >Affects Versions: 2.5 > Environment: Centos/ Windows10 >Reporter: ARomantsov >Priority: Minor > Fix For: 2.8 > > > I run cluster in diffrent configuration (centos and windows 10) and notice > that log command return diffrent count of rows in same from and to > Windows rest return 1 less rows -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Resolved] (IGNITE-9356) Ignite rest command http://localhost:8080/ignite?cmd=log=n=m return more line in linux than windows
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9356?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ARomantsov resolved IGNITE-9356. Resolution: Cannot Reproduce > Ignite rest command http://localhost:8080/ignite?cmd=log=n=m return > more line in linux than windows > - > > Key: IGNITE-9356 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9356 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: rest >Affects Versions: 2.5 > Environment: Centos/ Windows10 >Reporter: ARomantsov >Priority: Minor > Fix For: 2.8 > > > I run cluster in diffrent configuration (centos and windows 10) and notice > that log command return diffrent count of rows in same from and to > Windows rest return 1 less rows -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-10504) If client have cache resource with not configurate data region it stop by handler
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ARomantsov updated IGNITE-10504: Description: {code:java} [16:02:08,932][SEVERE][exchange-worker-#58][] Critical system error detected. Will be handled accordingly to configured handler [hnd=StopNodeOrHaltFailureHandler [tryStop=false, timeout=0, super=AbstractFailureHandler [ignoredFailureTyp es=SingletonSet [SYSTEM_WORKER_BLOCKED]]], failureCtx=FailureContext [type=SYSTEM_WORKER_TERMINATION, err=class o.a.i.IgniteCheckedException: Requested DataRegion is not configured: region-name2]] class org.apache.ignite.IgniteCheckedException: Requested DataRegion is not configured: region-name2 at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.IgniteCacheDatabaseSharedManager.dataRegion(IgniteCacheDatabaseSharedManager.java:729) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheProcessor.startCacheGroup(GridCacheProcessor.java:2641) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheProcessor.lambda$getOrCreateCacheGroupContext$8(GridCacheProcessor.java:2415) at org.apache.ignite.internal.util.InitializationProtector.protect(InitializationProtector.java:60) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheProcessor.getOrCreateCacheGroupContext(GridCacheProcessor.java:2412) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheProcessor.prepareCacheContext(GridCacheProcessor.java:2263) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheProcessor.lambda$null$fd62dedb$1(GridCacheProcessor.java:2110) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheProcessor.lambda$prepareStartCaches$4(GridCacheProcessor.java:2033) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheProcessor.lambda$prepareStartCaches$937cbe24$1(GridCacheProcessor.java:2107) at org.apache.ignite.internal.util.IgniteUtils.doInParallel(IgniteUtils.java:10891) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheProcessor.prepareStartCaches(GridCacheProcessor.java:2102) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheProcessor.prepareStartCaches(GridCacheProcessor.java:2032) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheProcessor.startCachesOnLocalJoin(GridCacheProcessor.java:1978) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.preloader.GridDhtPartitionsExchangeFuture.initCachesOnLocalJoin(GridDhtPartitionsExchangeFuture.java:934) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.preloader.GridDhtPartitionsExchangeFuture.init(GridDhtPartitionsExchangeFuture.java:796) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCachePartitionExchangeManager$ExchangeWorker.body0(GridCachePartitionExchangeManager.java:2904) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCachePartitionExchangeManager$ExchangeWorker.body(GridCachePartitionExchangeManager.java:2761) at org.apache.ignite.internal.util.worker.GridWorker.run(GridWorker.java:120) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) {code} > If client have cache resource with not configurate data region it stop by > handler > - > > Key: IGNITE-10504 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10504 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 2.7 >Reporter: ARomantsov >Priority: Minor > Fix For: 2.8 > > > {code:java} > [16:02:08,932][SEVERE][exchange-worker-#58][] Critical system error detected. > Will be handled accordingly to configured handler > [hnd=StopNodeOrHaltFailureHandler [tryStop=false, timeout=0, > super=AbstractFailureHandler [ignoredFailureTyp > es=SingletonSet [SYSTEM_WORKER_BLOCKED]]], failureCtx=FailureContext > [type=SYSTEM_WORKER_TERMINATION, err=class o.a.i.IgniteCheckedException: > Requested DataRegion is not configured: region-name2]] > class org.apache.ignite.IgniteCheckedException: Requested DataRegion is not > configured: region-name2 > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.IgniteCacheDatabaseSharedManager.dataRegion(IgniteCacheDatabaseSharedManager.java:729) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheProcessor.startCacheGroup(GridCacheProcessor.java:2641) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheProcessor.lambda$getOrCreateCacheGroupContext$8(GridCacheProcessor.java:2415) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.util.InitializationProtector.protect(InitializationProtector.java:60) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheProcessor.getOrCreateCacheGroupContext(GridCacheProcessor.java:2412) > at >
[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-10504) If client have cache resource with not configurate data region it stop by handler
ARomantsov created IGNITE-10504: --- Summary: If client have cache resource with not configurate data region it stop by handler Key: IGNITE-10504 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10504 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 2.7 Reporter: ARomantsov Fix For: 2.8 -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-10477) An empty cluster falls if wal segment size small
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ARomantsov updated IGNITE-10477: Description: I set and try to activate empty cluster. Get cluster drop by handler and next error Two servers and many caches {code:java} [15:45:12,723][SEVERE][db-checkpoint-thread-#99][] Critical system error detected. Will be handled accordingly to configured handler [hnd=class o.a.i.failure.StopNodeOrHaltFailureHandler, failureCtx=FailureContext [type=SYSTEM_WORKER_TE RMINATION, err=java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Record is too long [capacity=100, size=1802204]]] java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Record is too long [capacity=100, size=1802204] at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.SegmentedRingByteBuffer.offer0(SegmentedRingByteBuffer.java:214) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.SegmentedRingByteBuffer.offer(SegmentedRingByteBuffer.java:193) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.FileWriteAheadLogManager$FileWriteHandle.addRecord(FileWriteAheadLogManager.java:2472) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.FileWriteAheadLogManager$FileWriteHandle.access$1600(FileWriteAheadLogManager.java:2376) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.FileWriteAheadLogManager.log(FileWriteAheadLogManager.java:821) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.GridCacheDatabaseSharedManager$Checkpointer.markCheckpointBegin(GridCacheDatabaseSharedManager.java:3604) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.GridCacheDatabaseSharedManager$Checkpointer.doCheckpoint(GridCacheDatabaseSharedManager.java:3091) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.GridCacheDatabaseSharedManager$Checkpointer.body(GridCacheDatabaseSharedManager.java:2990) at org.apache.ignite.internal.util.worker.GridWorker.run(GridWorker.java:110) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) {code} was: I set and try to activate empty cluster. Get cluster drop by handler and next error {code:java} [15:45:12,723][SEVERE][db-checkpoint-thread-#99][] Critical system error detected. Will be handled accordingly to configured handler [hnd=class o.a.i.failure.StopNodeOrHaltFailureHandler, failureCtx=FailureContext [type=SYSTEM_WORKER_TE RMINATION, err=java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Record is too long [capacity=100, size=1802204]]] java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Record is too long [capacity=100, size=1802204] at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.SegmentedRingByteBuffer.offer0(SegmentedRingByteBuffer.java:214) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.SegmentedRingByteBuffer.offer(SegmentedRingByteBuffer.java:193) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.FileWriteAheadLogManager$FileWriteHandle.addRecord(FileWriteAheadLogManager.java:2472) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.FileWriteAheadLogManager$FileWriteHandle.access$1600(FileWriteAheadLogManager.java:2376) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.FileWriteAheadLogManager.log(FileWriteAheadLogManager.java:821) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.GridCacheDatabaseSharedManager$Checkpointer.markCheckpointBegin(GridCacheDatabaseSharedManager.java:3604) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.GridCacheDatabaseSharedManager$Checkpointer.doCheckpoint(GridCacheDatabaseSharedManager.java:3091) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.GridCacheDatabaseSharedManager$Checkpointer.body(GridCacheDatabaseSharedManager.java:2990) at org.apache.ignite.internal.util.worker.GridWorker.run(GridWorker.java:110) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) {code} > An empty cluster falls if wal segment size small > - > > Key: IGNITE-10477 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10477 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Bug > Components: data structures >Affects Versions: 2.7 >Reporter: ARomantsov >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.8 > > > I set and try to activate > empty cluster. > Get cluster drop by handler and next error > Two servers and many caches > {code:java} > [15:45:12,723][SEVERE][db-checkpoint-thread-#99][] Critical system error > detected. Will be handled accordingly to configured handler [hnd=class > o.a.i.failure.StopNodeOrHaltFailureHandler, failureCtx=FailureContext > [type=SYSTEM_WORKER_TE > RMINATION, err=java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Record is too long > [capacity=100, size=1802204]]]
[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-10477) An empty cluster falls if wal segment size small
ARomantsov created IGNITE-10477: --- Summary: An empty cluster falls if wal segment size small Key: IGNITE-10477 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10477 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Bug Components: data structures Affects Versions: 2.7 Reporter: ARomantsov Fix For: 2.8 I set and try to activate empty cluster. Get cluster drop by handler and next error {code:java} [15:45:12,723][SEVERE][db-checkpoint-thread-#99][] Critical system error detected. Will be handled accordingly to configured handler [hnd=class o.a.i.failure.StopNodeOrHaltFailureHandler, failureCtx=FailureContext [type=SYSTEM_WORKER_TE RMINATION, err=java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Record is too long [capacity=100, size=1802204]]] java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Record is too long [capacity=100, size=1802204] at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.SegmentedRingByteBuffer.offer0(SegmentedRingByteBuffer.java:214) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.SegmentedRingByteBuffer.offer(SegmentedRingByteBuffer.java:193) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.FileWriteAheadLogManager$FileWriteHandle.addRecord(FileWriteAheadLogManager.java:2472) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.FileWriteAheadLogManager$FileWriteHandle.access$1600(FileWriteAheadLogManager.java:2376) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.wal.FileWriteAheadLogManager.log(FileWriteAheadLogManager.java:821) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.GridCacheDatabaseSharedManager$Checkpointer.markCheckpointBegin(GridCacheDatabaseSharedManager.java:3604) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.GridCacheDatabaseSharedManager$Checkpointer.doCheckpoint(GridCacheDatabaseSharedManager.java:3091) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.GridCacheDatabaseSharedManager$Checkpointer.body(GridCacheDatabaseSharedManager.java:2990) at org.apache.ignite.internal.util.worker.GridWorker.run(GridWorker.java:110) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) {code} -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-10446) control.sh --cache idle_verify fail with NPE when node left grid
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10446?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ARomantsov updated IGNITE-10446: Description: Command [IDLE_VERIFY -host=***] started at [2018-11-28 15:54:23]... Error code: 13000. java.lang.NullPointerException. Command [IDLE_VERIFY] failed with error: 13000 - command failed. > control.sh --cache idle_verify fail with NPE when node left grid > > > Key: IGNITE-10446 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10446 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 2.7 >Reporter: ARomantsov >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.8 > > > > Command [IDLE_VERIFY -host=***] started at [2018-11-28 15:54:23]... > Error code: 13000. java.lang.NullPointerException. > Command [IDLE_VERIFY] failed with error: 13000 - command failed. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-10446) control.sh --cache idle_verify fail with NPE when node left grid
ARomantsov created IGNITE-10446: --- Summary: control.sh --cache idle_verify fail with NPE when node left grid Key: IGNITE-10446 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10446 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 2.7 Reporter: ARomantsov Fix For: 2.8 -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-10402) Restart cluster with BLT led to loss of node due to AE
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10402?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ARomantsov updated IGNITE-10402: Description: {code:java} [23:44:47,616][SEVERE][sys-#88][] Critical system error detected. Will be handled accordingly to configured handler [hnd=StopNodeOrHaltFailureHandler [tryStop=false, timeout=0, super=AbstractFailureHandler [ignoredFailureTypes=Singleton Set [SYSTEM_WORKER_BLOCKED]]], failureCtx=FailureContext [type=CRITICAL_ERROR, err=java.lang.AssertionError]] java.lang.AssertionError {code} was: {code:java} [23:44:47,616][SEVERE][sys-#88][] Critical system error detected. Will be handled accordingly to configured handler [hnd=StopNodeOrHaltFailureHandler [tryStop=false, timeout=0, super=AbstractFailureHandler [ignoredFailureTypes=Singleton Set [SYSTEM_WORKER_BLOCKED]]], failureCtx=FailureContext [type=CRITICAL_ERROR, err=java.lang.AssertionError]] java.lang.AssertionError at org.gridgain.grid.internal.processors.cache.database.GridSnapshotAwareClusterStateProcessorImpl$3.apply(GridSnapshotAwareClusterStateProcessorImpl.java:291) at org.gridgain.grid.internal.processors.cache.database.GridSnapshotAwareClusterStateProcessorImpl$3.apply(GridSnapshotAwareClusterStateProcessorImpl.java:270) at org.apache.ignite.internal.util.future.GridFutureAdapter.notifyListener(GridFutureAdapter.java:385) at org.apache.ignite.internal.util.future.GridFutureAdapter.unblock(GridFutureAdapter.java:349) at org.apache.ignite.internal.util.future.GridFutureAdapter.unblockAll(GridFutureAdapter.java:337) at org.apache.ignite.internal.util.future.GridFutureAdapter.onDone(GridFutureAdapter.java:497) at org.apache.ignite.internal.util.future.GridFutureAdapter.onDone(GridFutureAdapter.java:476) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.preloader.GridDhtPartitionsExchangeFuture.onDone(GridDhtPartitionsExchangeFuture.java:2183) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.preloader.GridDhtPartitionsExchangeFuture.finishExchangeOnCoordinator(GridDhtPartitionsExchangeFuture.java:3497) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.preloader.GridDhtPartitionsExchangeFuture.onAllReceived(GridDhtPartitionsExchangeFuture.java:3208) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.preloader.GridDhtPartitionsExchangeFuture.processSingleMessage(GridDhtPartitionsExchangeFuture.java:2809) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.preloader.GridDhtPartitionsExchangeFuture.access$100(GridDhtPartitionsExchangeFuture.java:141) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.preloader.GridDhtPartitionsExchangeFuture$2.apply(GridDhtPartitionsExchangeFuture.java:2614) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.preloader.GridDhtPartitionsExchangeFuture$2.apply(GridDhtPartitionsExchangeFuture.java:2602) at org.apache.ignite.internal.util.future.GridFutureAdapter.notifyListener(GridFutureAdapter.java:385) at org.apache.ignite.internal.util.future.GridFutureAdapter.listen(GridFutureAdapter.java:355) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.preloader.GridDhtPartitionsExchangeFuture.onReceiveSingleMessage(GridDhtPartitionsExchangeFuture.java:2602) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCachePartitionExchangeManager.processSinglePartitionUpdate(GridCachePartitionExchangeManager.java:1839) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCachePartitionExchangeManager.access$1200(GridCachePartitionExchangeManager.java:146) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCachePartitionExchangeManager$2.onMessage(GridCachePartitionExchangeManager.java:386) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCachePartitionExchangeManager$2.onMessage(GridCachePartitionExchangeManager.java:344) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCachePartitionExchangeManager$MessageHandler.apply(GridCachePartitionExchangeManager.java:3334) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCachePartitionExchangeManager$MessageHandler.apply(GridCachePartitionExchangeManager.java:3313) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheIoManager.processMessage(GridCacheIoManager.java:1061) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheIoManager.onMessage0(GridCacheIoManager.java:586) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheIoManager.handleMessage(GridCacheIoManager.java:385) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheIoManager.handleMessage(GridCacheIoManager.java:311) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheIoManager.access$100(GridCacheIoManager.java:101) at
[jira] [Resolved] (IGNITE-10402) Restart cluster with BLT led to loss of node due to AE
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10402?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ARomantsov resolved IGNITE-10402. - Resolution: Cannot Reproduce Fix Version/s: (was: 2.8) > Restart cluster with BLT led to loss of node due to AE > -- > > Key: IGNITE-10402 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10402 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Bug > Components: data structures >Affects Versions: 2.8 >Reporter: ARomantsov >Assignee: Sergey Antonov >Priority: Critical > > {code:java} > [23:44:47,616][SEVERE][sys-#88][] Critical system error detected. Will be > handled accordingly to configured handler [hnd=StopNodeOrHaltFailureHandler > [tryStop=false, timeout=0, super=AbstractFailureHandler > [ignoredFailureTypes=Singleton > Set [SYSTEM_WORKER_BLOCKED]]], failureCtx=FailureContext > [type=CRITICAL_ERROR, err=java.lang.AssertionError]] > java.lang.AssertionError > {code} -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-10404) Handler stop node with reason - IgniteException: Checkpoint read lock acquisition has been timed out
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10404?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ARomantsov updated IGNITE-10404: Description: I know about possible WA - set readLockCheckpointTimeout to zero, but it make product unstable, sometimes I forget this option and my cluster totally broken when I try to load (was: I now about possible WA - set readLockCheckpointTimeout to zero, but it make product unstable, sometimes I forget this option and my cluster totally broken when I try to load) > Handler stop node with reason - IgniteException: Checkpoint read lock > acquisition has been timed out > > > Key: IGNITE-10404 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10404 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 2.7 >Reporter: ARomantsov >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.8 > > > I know about possible WA - set readLockCheckpointTimeout to zero, but it > make product unstable, sometimes I forget this option and my cluster totally > broken when I try to load -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-10404) Handler stop node with reason - IgniteException: Checkpoint read lock acquisition has been timed out
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10404?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ARomantsov updated IGNITE-10404: Affects Version/s: 2.7 > Handler stop node with reason - IgniteException: Checkpoint read lock > acquisition has been timed out > > > Key: IGNITE-10404 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10404 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 2.7 >Reporter: ARomantsov >Priority: Critical > > I now about possible WA - set readLockCheckpointTimeout to zero, but it make > product unstable, sometimes I forget this option and my cluster totally > broken when I try to load -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-10404) Handler stop node with reason - IgniteException: Checkpoint read lock acquisition has been timed out
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10404?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ARomantsov updated IGNITE-10404: Fix Version/s: 2.8 > Handler stop node with reason - IgniteException: Checkpoint read lock > acquisition has been timed out > > > Key: IGNITE-10404 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10404 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 2.7 >Reporter: ARomantsov >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.8 > > > I now about possible WA - set readLockCheckpointTimeout to zero, but it make > product unstable, sometimes I forget this option and my cluster totally > broken when I try to load -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-10404) Handler stop node with reason - IgniteException: Checkpoint read lock acquisition has been timed out
ARomantsov created IGNITE-10404: --- Summary: Handler stop node with reason - IgniteException: Checkpoint read lock acquisition has been timed out Key: IGNITE-10404 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10404 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Bug Reporter: ARomantsov I now about possible WA - set readLockCheckpointTimeout to zero, but it make product unstable, sometimes I forget this option and my cluster totally broken when I try to load -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-10402) Restart cluster with BLT led to loss of node due to AE
ARomantsov created IGNITE-10402: --- Summary: Restart cluster with BLT led to loss of node due to AE Key: IGNITE-10402 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10402 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Bug Components: data structures Affects Versions: 2.8 Reporter: ARomantsov Fix For: 2.8 {code:java} [23:44:47,616][SEVERE][sys-#88][] Critical system error detected. Will be handled accordingly to configured handler [hnd=StopNodeOrHaltFailureHandler [tryStop=false, timeout=0, super=AbstractFailureHandler [ignoredFailureTypes=Singleton Set [SYSTEM_WORKER_BLOCKED]]], failureCtx=FailureContext [type=CRITICAL_ERROR, err=java.lang.AssertionError]] java.lang.AssertionError at org.gridgain.grid.internal.processors.cache.database.GridSnapshotAwareClusterStateProcessorImpl$3.apply(GridSnapshotAwareClusterStateProcessorImpl.java:291) at org.gridgain.grid.internal.processors.cache.database.GridSnapshotAwareClusterStateProcessorImpl$3.apply(GridSnapshotAwareClusterStateProcessorImpl.java:270) at org.apache.ignite.internal.util.future.GridFutureAdapter.notifyListener(GridFutureAdapter.java:385) at org.apache.ignite.internal.util.future.GridFutureAdapter.unblock(GridFutureAdapter.java:349) at org.apache.ignite.internal.util.future.GridFutureAdapter.unblockAll(GridFutureAdapter.java:337) at org.apache.ignite.internal.util.future.GridFutureAdapter.onDone(GridFutureAdapter.java:497) at org.apache.ignite.internal.util.future.GridFutureAdapter.onDone(GridFutureAdapter.java:476) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.preloader.GridDhtPartitionsExchangeFuture.onDone(GridDhtPartitionsExchangeFuture.java:2183) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.preloader.GridDhtPartitionsExchangeFuture.finishExchangeOnCoordinator(GridDhtPartitionsExchangeFuture.java:3497) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.preloader.GridDhtPartitionsExchangeFuture.onAllReceived(GridDhtPartitionsExchangeFuture.java:3208) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.preloader.GridDhtPartitionsExchangeFuture.processSingleMessage(GridDhtPartitionsExchangeFuture.java:2809) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.preloader.GridDhtPartitionsExchangeFuture.access$100(GridDhtPartitionsExchangeFuture.java:141) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.preloader.GridDhtPartitionsExchangeFuture$2.apply(GridDhtPartitionsExchangeFuture.java:2614) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.preloader.GridDhtPartitionsExchangeFuture$2.apply(GridDhtPartitionsExchangeFuture.java:2602) at org.apache.ignite.internal.util.future.GridFutureAdapter.notifyListener(GridFutureAdapter.java:385) at org.apache.ignite.internal.util.future.GridFutureAdapter.listen(GridFutureAdapter.java:355) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.preloader.GridDhtPartitionsExchangeFuture.onReceiveSingleMessage(GridDhtPartitionsExchangeFuture.java:2602) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCachePartitionExchangeManager.processSinglePartitionUpdate(GridCachePartitionExchangeManager.java:1839) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCachePartitionExchangeManager.access$1200(GridCachePartitionExchangeManager.java:146) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCachePartitionExchangeManager$2.onMessage(GridCachePartitionExchangeManager.java:386) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCachePartitionExchangeManager$2.onMessage(GridCachePartitionExchangeManager.java:344) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCachePartitionExchangeManager$MessageHandler.apply(GridCachePartitionExchangeManager.java:3334) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCachePartitionExchangeManager$MessageHandler.apply(GridCachePartitionExchangeManager.java:3313) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheIoManager.processMessage(GridCacheIoManager.java:1061) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheIoManager.onMessage0(GridCacheIoManager.java:586) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheIoManager.handleMessage(GridCacheIoManager.java:385) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheIoManager.handleMessage(GridCacheIoManager.java:311) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheIoManager.access$100(GridCacheIoManager.java:101) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheIoManager$1.onMessage(GridCacheIoManager.java:300) at
[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-10401) After node join and rebalance - some partition hang in move state
ARomantsov created IGNITE-10401: --- Summary: After node join and rebalance - some partition hang in move state Key: IGNITE-10401 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10401 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Bug Components: data structures Affects Versions: 2.7 Reporter: ARomantsov Fix For: 2.8 I try to kill three nodes and return them back after some load time They begin to rebalance, but one host eventually have many MOVING partition and they not become owning after PME -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Resolved] (IGNITE-10400) Server node stop by handler IgniteException: Failed to resolve node topology
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10400?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ARomantsov resolved IGNITE-10400. - Resolution: Duplicate > Server node stop by handler IgniteException: Failed to resolve node topology > > > Key: IGNITE-10400 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10400 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Bug >Reporter: ARomantsov >Priority: Critical > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-10400) Server node stop by handler IgniteException: Failed to resolve node topology
ARomantsov created IGNITE-10400: --- Summary: Server node stop by handler IgniteException: Failed to resolve node topology Key: IGNITE-10400 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10400 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Bug Reporter: ARomantsov -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-10395) Add to control.sh --cache --tx overall info: count of transaction and count of transaction in each state (Rollback, Commiting and etc)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10395?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ARomantsov updated IGNITE-10395: Summary: Add to control.sh --cache --tx overall info: count of transaction and count of transaction in each state (Rollback, Commiting and etc) (was: Add to control.sh --cache --tx overall info:) > Add to control.sh --cache --tx overall info: count of transaction and count > of transaction in each state (Rollback, Commiting and etc) > -- > > Key: IGNITE-10395 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10395 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: ARomantsov >Priority: Major > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-10395) Add to control.sh --cache --tx overall info:
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10395?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ARomantsov updated IGNITE-10395: Issue Type: Improvement (was: Bug) > Add to control.sh --cache --tx overall info: > > > Key: IGNITE-10395 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10395 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: ARomantsov >Priority: Major > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-10395) Add to control.sh --cache --tx overall info:
ARomantsov created IGNITE-10395: --- Summary: Add to control.sh --cache --tx overall info: Key: IGNITE-10395 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10395 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Bug Reporter: ARomantsov -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-10394) Try to activate cluster after deactivate. All node exit by handler
ARomantsov created IGNITE-10394: --- Summary: Try to activate cluster after deactivate. All node exit by handler Key: IGNITE-10394 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10394 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Bug Components: data structures Affects Versions: 2.7 Reporter: ARomantsov AE: ignite-sys-cache ..processors.cache.CacheRegistry.update(CacheRegistry.java:188) -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-10205) add to utility command - ./control.sh --cache idle_verify --dump abbility to exclude cache from output file
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10205?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ARomantsov updated IGNITE-10205: Priority: Major (was: Critical) > add to utility command - ./control.sh --cache idle_verify --dump abbility to > exclude cache from output file > > > Key: IGNITE-10205 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10205 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Improvement >Affects Versions: 2.6 >Reporter: ARomantsov >Priority: Major > Fix For: 2.8 > > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-10327) Claster take NPE due cache stop and stop by handler
ARomantsov created IGNITE-10327: --- Summary: Claster take NPE due cache stop and stop by handler Key: IGNITE-10327 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10327 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Bug Components: data structures Affects Versions: 2.8 Reporter: ARomantsov Fix For: 2.7 Stop all caches Take NPE : null on preloadEntry(GridDhtPartitionDemander.java:893) -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-10323) Contol utility --deactivate on non-activate cluster produse NPE and handler stop nodes
ARomantsov created IGNITE-10323: --- Summary: Contol utility --deactivate on non-activate cluster produse NPE and handler stop nodes Key: IGNITE-10323 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10323 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Bug Components: persistence Affects Versions: 2.7 Reporter: ARomantsov Fix For: 2.8 Scenario: 1) Start cluster 2) Call control.sh --deactivate -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-10313) Long exchange on deactivation process
ARomantsov created IGNITE-10313: --- Summary: Long exchange on deactivation process Key: IGNITE-10313 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10313 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 2.7 Environment: 16 host, 1 server node per host Reporter: ARomantsov Fix For: 2.8 Long exhange after start deactivation process - near to three minutes. Probably in doesn't end, but control.sh return to control to console and I stop cluster -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-9980) Modify ./control.sh --cache idle_verify --dump print to diff mode (user persistant only/user not-persistent only/system only) cache
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9980?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ARomantsov updated IGNITE-9980: --- Fix Version/s: 2.8 > Modify ./control.sh --cache idle_verify --dump print to diff mode (user > persistant only/user not-persistent only/system only) cache > --- > > Key: IGNITE-9980 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9980 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Improvement >Affects Versions: 2.6 >Reporter: ARomantsov >Priority: Major > Fix For: 2.8 > > > It will be cool , if control.sh --cache idle_verify can show > persistent/not-persistent/system caches and it will be impliments due utility > flag -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-10205) add to utility command - ./control.sh --cache idle_verify --dump abbility to exclude cache from output file
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10205?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ARomantsov updated IGNITE-10205: Affects Version/s: 2.6 > add to utility command - ./control.sh --cache idle_verify --dump abbility to > exclude cache from output file > > > Key: IGNITE-10205 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10205 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Improvement >Affects Versions: 2.6 >Reporter: ARomantsov >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.8 > > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-10205) add to utility command - ./control.sh --cache idle_verify --dump abbility to exclude cache from output file
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10205?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ARomantsov updated IGNITE-10205: Fix Version/s: 2.8 > add to utility command - ./control.sh --cache idle_verify --dump abbility to > exclude cache from output file > > > Key: IGNITE-10205 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10205 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Improvement >Affects Versions: 2.6 >Reporter: ARomantsov >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.8 > > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-10205) add to utility command - ./control.sh --cache idle_verify --dump abbility to exclude cache from output file
ARomantsov created IGNITE-10205: --- Summary: add to utility command - ./control.sh --cache idle_verify --dump abbility to exclude cache from output file Key: IGNITE-10205 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10205 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: ARomantsov -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-9980) Modify ./control.sh --cache idle_verify --dump print to diff mode (user persistant only/user not-persistent only/system only) cache
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9980?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ARomantsov updated IGNITE-9980: --- Issue Type: Improvement (was: Bug) > Modify ./control.sh --cache idle_verify --dump print to diff mode (user > persistant only/user not-persistent only/system only) cache > --- > > Key: IGNITE-9980 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9980 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Improvement >Affects Versions: 2.6 >Reporter: ARomantsov >Priority: Major > Fix For: 2.8 > > > It will be cool , if control.sh --cache idle_verify can show > persistent/not-persistent/system caches and it will be impliments due utility > flag -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-9980) Modify ./control.sh --cache idle_verify --dump print to diff mode (user persistant only/user not-persistent only/system only) cache
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9980?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ARomantsov updated IGNITE-9980: --- Description: It will be cool , if control.sh --cache idle_verify can show persistent/not-persistent/system caches and it will be impliments due utility flag (was: It will be cool , if control.sh --cache idle_verify can show persistent/not-persistent/both caches and it will be impliments due utility flag) > Modify ./control.sh --cache idle_verify --dump print to diff mode (user > persistant only/user not-persistent only/system only) cache > --- > > Key: IGNITE-9980 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9980 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 2.6 >Reporter: ARomantsov >Priority: Major > > It will be cool , if control.sh --cache idle_verify can show > persistent/not-persistent/system caches and it will be impliments due utility > flag -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-9980) Modify ./control.sh --cache idle_verify --dump print to diff mode (user persistant only/user not-persistent only/system only) cache
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9980?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ARomantsov updated IGNITE-9980: --- Summary: Modify ./control.sh --cache idle_verify --dump print to diff mode (user persistant only/user not-persistent only/system only) cache (was: Modify ./control.sh --cache idle_verify --dump to print only persistante cache or add flag --persistentOnly) > Modify ./control.sh --cache idle_verify --dump print to diff mode (user > persistant only/user not-persistent only/system only) cache > --- > > Key: IGNITE-9980 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9980 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 2.6 >Reporter: ARomantsov >Priority: Major > > It will be cool , if control.sh --cache idle_verify can show > persistent/not-persistent/both caches and it will be impliments due utility > flag -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-10134) control.sh --cache list . --config not working on big cache setup
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10134?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16673299#comment-16673299 ] ARomantsov commented on IGNITE-10134: - I found that command on - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9853 > control.sh --cache list . --config not working on big cache setup > - > > Key: IGNITE-10134 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10134 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Bug >Reporter: ARomantsov >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.8 > > > {code:java} > [17:09:31,352][SEVERE][mgmt-#271][GridTaskWorker] Failed to reduce job > results due to undeclared user exception > [task=o.a.i.i.v.cache.VisorCacheConfigurationCollectorTask@22c7b357, > err=java.lang.AssertionError] > java.lang.AssertionError > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.visor.VisorOneNodeTask.reduce0(VisorOneNodeTask.java:30) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.visor.VisorMultiNodeTask.reduce(VisorMultiNodeTask.java:139) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.task.GridTaskWorker$6.call(GridTaskWorker.java:1133) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.util.IgniteUtils.wrapThreadLoader(IgniteUtils.java:6726) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.task.GridTaskWorker.reduce(GridTaskWorker.java:1131) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.task.GridTaskWorker.onResponse(GridTaskWorker.java:958) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.task.GridTaskProcessor.processJobExecuteResponse(GridTaskProcessor.java:1104) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.task.GridTaskProcessor$JobMessageListener.onMessage(GridTaskProcessor.java:1339) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.managers.communication.GridIoManager.invokeListener(GridIoManager.java:1556) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.managers.communication.GridIoManager.processRegularMessage0(GridIoManager.java:1184) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.managers.communication.GridIoManager.access$4200(GridIoManager.java:125) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.managers.communication.GridIoManager$9.run(GridIoManager.java:1091) > at > java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149) > at > java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624) > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) > [17:09:31,354][SEVERE][mgmt-#271][GridTaskCommandHandler] Failed to execute > task [name=o.a.i.i.v.cache.VisorCacheConfigurationCollectorTask, > clientId=606bf232-20e0-4799-bfb1-8d6e44b0d1ad] > class org.apache.ignite.IgniteCheckedException: Failed to reduce job results > due to undeclared user exception > [task=org.apache.ignite.internal.visor.cache.VisorCacheConfigurationCollectorTask@22c7b357, > err=java.lang.AssertionError] > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.util.IgniteUtils.cast(IgniteUtils.java:7338) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.util.future.GridFutureAdapter.resolve(GridFutureAdapter.java:259) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.util.future.GridFutureAdapter.get0(GridFutureAdapter.java:171) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.util.future.GridFutureAdapter.get(GridFutureAdapter.java:140) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.rest.handlers.task.GridTaskCommandHandler$2.apply(GridTaskCommandHandler.java:263) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.rest.handlers.task.GridTaskCommandHandler$2.apply(GridTaskCommandHandler.java:257) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.util.future.GridFutureAdapter.notifyListener(GridFutureAdapter.java:383) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.util.future.GridFutureAdapter.unblock(GridFutureAdapter.java:347) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.util.future.GridFutureAdapter.unblockAll(GridFutureAdapter.java:335) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.util.future.GridFutureAdapter.onDone(GridFutureAdapter.java:495) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.util.future.GridFutureAdapter.onDone(GridFutureAdapter.java:474) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.task.GridTaskWorker.finishTask(GridTaskWorker.java:1617) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.task.GridTaskWorker.finishTask(GridTaskWorker.java:1585) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.task.GridTaskWorker.reduce(GridTaskWorker.java:1175) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.task.GridTaskWorker.onResponse(GridTaskWorker.java:958) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.task.GridTaskProcessor.processJobExecuteResponse(GridTaskProcessor.java:1104) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.task.GridTaskProcessor$JobMessageListener.onMessage(GridTaskProcessor.java:1339) > at >
[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-10134) control.sh --cache list . --config not working on big cache setup
ARomantsov created IGNITE-10134: --- Summary: control.sh --cache list . --config not working on big cache setup Key: IGNITE-10134 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10134 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Bug Reporter: ARomantsov {code:java} [17:09:31,352][SEVERE][mgmt-#271][GridTaskWorker] Failed to reduce job results due to undeclared user exception [task=o.a.i.i.v.cache.VisorCacheConfigurationCollectorTask@22c7b357, err=java.lang.AssertionError] java.lang.AssertionError at org.apache.ignite.internal.visor.VisorOneNodeTask.reduce0(VisorOneNodeTask.java:30) at org.apache.ignite.internal.visor.VisorMultiNodeTask.reduce(VisorMultiNodeTask.java:139) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.task.GridTaskWorker$6.call(GridTaskWorker.java:1133) at org.apache.ignite.internal.util.IgniteUtils.wrapThreadLoader(IgniteUtils.java:6726) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.task.GridTaskWorker.reduce(GridTaskWorker.java:1131) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.task.GridTaskWorker.onResponse(GridTaskWorker.java:958) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.task.GridTaskProcessor.processJobExecuteResponse(GridTaskProcessor.java:1104) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.task.GridTaskProcessor$JobMessageListener.onMessage(GridTaskProcessor.java:1339) at org.apache.ignite.internal.managers.communication.GridIoManager.invokeListener(GridIoManager.java:1556) at org.apache.ignite.internal.managers.communication.GridIoManager.processRegularMessage0(GridIoManager.java:1184) at org.apache.ignite.internal.managers.communication.GridIoManager.access$4200(GridIoManager.java:125) at org.apache.ignite.internal.managers.communication.GridIoManager$9.run(GridIoManager.java:1091) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) [17:09:31,354][SEVERE][mgmt-#271][GridTaskCommandHandler] Failed to execute task [name=o.a.i.i.v.cache.VisorCacheConfigurationCollectorTask, clientId=606bf232-20e0-4799-bfb1-8d6e44b0d1ad] class org.apache.ignite.IgniteCheckedException: Failed to reduce job results due to undeclared user exception [task=org.apache.ignite.internal.visor.cache.VisorCacheConfigurationCollectorTask@22c7b357, err=java.lang.AssertionError] at org.apache.ignite.internal.util.IgniteUtils.cast(IgniteUtils.java:7338) at org.apache.ignite.internal.util.future.GridFutureAdapter.resolve(GridFutureAdapter.java:259) at org.apache.ignite.internal.util.future.GridFutureAdapter.get0(GridFutureAdapter.java:171) at org.apache.ignite.internal.util.future.GridFutureAdapter.get(GridFutureAdapter.java:140) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.rest.handlers.task.GridTaskCommandHandler$2.apply(GridTaskCommandHandler.java:263) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.rest.handlers.task.GridTaskCommandHandler$2.apply(GridTaskCommandHandler.java:257) at org.apache.ignite.internal.util.future.GridFutureAdapter.notifyListener(GridFutureAdapter.java:383) at org.apache.ignite.internal.util.future.GridFutureAdapter.unblock(GridFutureAdapter.java:347) at org.apache.ignite.internal.util.future.GridFutureAdapter.unblockAll(GridFutureAdapter.java:335) at org.apache.ignite.internal.util.future.GridFutureAdapter.onDone(GridFutureAdapter.java:495) at org.apache.ignite.internal.util.future.GridFutureAdapter.onDone(GridFutureAdapter.java:474) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.task.GridTaskWorker.finishTask(GridTaskWorker.java:1617) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.task.GridTaskWorker.finishTask(GridTaskWorker.java:1585) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.task.GridTaskWorker.reduce(GridTaskWorker.java:1175) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.task.GridTaskWorker.onResponse(GridTaskWorker.java:958) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.task.GridTaskProcessor.processJobExecuteResponse(GridTaskProcessor.java:1104) at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.task.GridTaskProcessor$JobMessageListener.onMessage(GridTaskProcessor.java:1339) at org.apache.ignite.internal.managers.communication.GridIoManager.invokeListener(GridIoManager.java:1556) at org.apache.ignite.internal.managers.communication.GridIoManager.processRegularMessage0(GridIoManager.java:1184) at org.apache.ignite.internal.managers.communication.GridIoManager.access$4200(GridIoManager.java:125) at org.apache.ignite.internal.managers.communication.GridIoManager$9.run(GridIoManager.java:1091) at
[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-10134) control.sh --cache list . --config not working on big cache setup
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10134?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ARomantsov updated IGNITE-10134: Fix Version/s: 2.8 > control.sh --cache list . --config not working on big cache setup > - > > Key: IGNITE-10134 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10134 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Bug >Reporter: ARomantsov >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.8 > > > {code:java} > [17:09:31,352][SEVERE][mgmt-#271][GridTaskWorker] Failed to reduce job > results due to undeclared user exception > [task=o.a.i.i.v.cache.VisorCacheConfigurationCollectorTask@22c7b357, > err=java.lang.AssertionError] > java.lang.AssertionError > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.visor.VisorOneNodeTask.reduce0(VisorOneNodeTask.java:30) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.visor.VisorMultiNodeTask.reduce(VisorMultiNodeTask.java:139) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.task.GridTaskWorker$6.call(GridTaskWorker.java:1133) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.util.IgniteUtils.wrapThreadLoader(IgniteUtils.java:6726) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.task.GridTaskWorker.reduce(GridTaskWorker.java:1131) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.task.GridTaskWorker.onResponse(GridTaskWorker.java:958) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.task.GridTaskProcessor.processJobExecuteResponse(GridTaskProcessor.java:1104) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.task.GridTaskProcessor$JobMessageListener.onMessage(GridTaskProcessor.java:1339) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.managers.communication.GridIoManager.invokeListener(GridIoManager.java:1556) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.managers.communication.GridIoManager.processRegularMessage0(GridIoManager.java:1184) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.managers.communication.GridIoManager.access$4200(GridIoManager.java:125) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.managers.communication.GridIoManager$9.run(GridIoManager.java:1091) > at > java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149) > at > java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624) > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) > [17:09:31,354][SEVERE][mgmt-#271][GridTaskCommandHandler] Failed to execute > task [name=o.a.i.i.v.cache.VisorCacheConfigurationCollectorTask, > clientId=606bf232-20e0-4799-bfb1-8d6e44b0d1ad] > class org.apache.ignite.IgniteCheckedException: Failed to reduce job results > due to undeclared user exception > [task=org.apache.ignite.internal.visor.cache.VisorCacheConfigurationCollectorTask@22c7b357, > err=java.lang.AssertionError] > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.util.IgniteUtils.cast(IgniteUtils.java:7338) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.util.future.GridFutureAdapter.resolve(GridFutureAdapter.java:259) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.util.future.GridFutureAdapter.get0(GridFutureAdapter.java:171) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.util.future.GridFutureAdapter.get(GridFutureAdapter.java:140) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.rest.handlers.task.GridTaskCommandHandler$2.apply(GridTaskCommandHandler.java:263) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.rest.handlers.task.GridTaskCommandHandler$2.apply(GridTaskCommandHandler.java:257) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.util.future.GridFutureAdapter.notifyListener(GridFutureAdapter.java:383) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.util.future.GridFutureAdapter.unblock(GridFutureAdapter.java:347) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.util.future.GridFutureAdapter.unblockAll(GridFutureAdapter.java:335) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.util.future.GridFutureAdapter.onDone(GridFutureAdapter.java:495) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.util.future.GridFutureAdapter.onDone(GridFutureAdapter.java:474) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.task.GridTaskWorker.finishTask(GridTaskWorker.java:1617) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.task.GridTaskWorker.finishTask(GridTaskWorker.java:1585) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.task.GridTaskWorker.reduce(GridTaskWorker.java:1175) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.task.GridTaskWorker.onResponse(GridTaskWorker.java:958) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.task.GridTaskProcessor.processJobExecuteResponse(GridTaskProcessor.java:1104) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.task.GridTaskProcessor$JobMessageListener.onMessage(GridTaskProcessor.java:1339) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.managers.communication.GridIoManager.invokeListener(GridIoManager.java:1556)
[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-10065) possibility to get EVT_CACHE_STARTED before cache proxy initialization
ARomantsov created IGNITE-10065: --- Summary: possibility to get EVT_CACHE_STARTED before cache proxy initialization Key: IGNITE-10065 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10065 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Bug Components: cache Affects Versions: 2.7 Reporter: ARomantsov Fix For: 2.8 It looks , I can take EVT_CACHE_STARTED before take message - Finish proxy initialization, cacheName=cache -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-9994) idle_verify -analyze -partId= -grpId=(minus)number not working
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ARomantsov updated IGNITE-9994: --- Priority: Major (was: Critical) > idle_verify -analyze -partId= -grpId=(minus)number not working > -- > > Key: IGNITE-9994 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9994 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 2.6 >Reporter: ARomantsov >Priority: Major > > If enter command with plus -grpId - it working -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-9994) idle_verify -analyze -partId= -grpId=(minus)number not working
ARomantsov created IGNITE-9994: -- Summary: idle_verify -analyze -partId= -grpId=(minus)number not working Key: IGNITE-9994 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9994 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 2.6 Reporter: ARomantsov If enter command with plus -grpId - it working -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-9992) Add some command to calculate hast sum per primary partition in product
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9992?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ARomantsov updated IGNITE-9992: --- Description: Some util to quick check cluster data is ok Or mode to control.sh --cache idle_verify --dump to calculate primary without log node info Example Cache - 1: Part - hash 1 - 13123213213 2 - 1313123213 ... etc was: Some util to quick check cluster data is ok Or mode to control.sh --cache idle_verify --dump to calculate primary without log node info > Add some command to calculate hast sum per primary partition in product > --- > > Key: IGNITE-9992 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9992 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Improvement >Affects Versions: 2.7 >Reporter: ARomantsov >Priority: Major > > Some util to quick check cluster data is ok > Or mode to control.sh --cache idle_verify --dump to calculate primary without > log node info > Example > Cache - 1: > Part - hash > 1 - 13123213213 > 2 - 1313123213 > ... etc -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-9992) Add some command to calculate hast sum per primary partition in product
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9992?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ARomantsov updated IGNITE-9992: --- Description: Some util to quick check cluster data is ok Or mode to control.sh --cache idle_verify --dump to calculate primary without log node info was:Some util to quick check cluster data is ok > Add some command to calculate hast sum per primary partition in product > --- > > Key: IGNITE-9992 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9992 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Improvement >Affects Versions: 2.7 >Reporter: ARomantsov >Priority: Major > > Some util to quick check cluster data is ok > Or mode to control.sh --cache idle_verify --dump to calculate primary without > log node info -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-9992) Add some command to calculate hast sum per primary partition in product
ARomantsov created IGNITE-9992: -- Summary: Add some command to calculate hast sum per primary partition in product Key: IGNITE-9992 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9992 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Improvement Affects Versions: 2.7 Reporter: ARomantsov Some util to quick check cluster data is ok -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-9980) Modify ./control.sh --cache idle_verify --dump to print only persistante cache or add flag --persistentOnly
ARomantsov created IGNITE-9980: -- Summary: Modify ./control.sh --cache idle_verify --dump to print only persistante cache or add flag --persistentOnly Key: IGNITE-9980 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9980 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 2.6 Reporter: ARomantsov It will be cool , if control.sh --cache idle_verify can show persistent/not-persistent/both caches and it will be impliments due utility flag -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-9905) After transaction load cluster inconsistent
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9905?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ARomantsov updated IGNITE-9905: --- Fix Version/s: (was: 2.7) > After transaction load cluster inconsistent > --- > > Key: IGNITE-9905 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9905 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Bug > Components: persistence >Affects Versions: 2.7 >Reporter: ARomantsov >Priority: Critical > > Loaded data into the cluster using transactions consisting of two get / two > put > Test env: one server, two server node, one client > {code:java} > idle_verify check has finished, found 60 conflict partitions: > [counterConflicts=45, hashConflicts=15] > Update counter conflicts: > Conflict partition: PartitionKeyV2 [grpId=-1903385190, > grpName=CACHEGROUP_PARTICLE_1, partId=98] > Partition instances: [PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=true, > consistentId=node2, updateCntr=1519, size=596, partHash=-1167688484], > PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=false, consistentId=node1, updateCntr=1520, > size=596, partHash=-1167688484]] > Conflict partition: PartitionKeyV2 [grpId=-1903385190, > grpName=CACHEGROUP_PARTICLE_1, partId=34] > Partition instances: [PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=false, > consistentId=node2, updateCntr=1539, size=596, partHash=-99631005], > PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=true, consistentId=node1, updateCntr=1537, > size=596, partHash=-1284437377]] > Conflict partition: PartitionKeyV2 [grpId=770187303, > grpName=CACHEGROUP_PARTICLE_1, partId=31] > Partition instances: [PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=true, > consistentId=node2, updateCntr=15, size=4, partHash=-1125172674], > PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=false, consistentId=node1, updateCntr=16, > size=4, partHash=-1125172674]] > Conflict partition: PartitionKeyV2 [grpId=-1903385190, > grpName=CACHEGROUP_PARTICLE_1, partId=39] > Partition instances: [PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=true, > consistentId=node2, updateCntr=1555, size=596, partHash=-40303136], > PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=false, consistentId=node1, updateCntr=1556, > size=596, partHash=-40303136]] > Conflict partition: PartitionKeyV2 [grpId=-1903385190, > grpName=CACHEGROUP_PARTICLE_1, partId=90] > Partition instances: [PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=false, > consistentId=node2, updateCntr=1557, size=596, partHash=-1295145299], > PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=true, consistentId=node1, updateCntr=1556, > size=596, partHash=-1221175703]] > ... > {code} -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-9905) After transaction load cluster inconsistent
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9905?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ARomantsov updated IGNITE-9905: --- Description: Loaded data into the cluster using transactions consisting of two get / two put Test env: one server, two server node, one client {code:java} idle_verify check has finished, found 60 conflict partitions: [counterConflicts=45, hashConflicts=15] Update counter conflicts: Conflict partition: PartitionKeyV2 [grpId=-1903385190, grpName=CACHEGROUP_PARTICLE_1, partId=98] Partition instances: [PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=true, consistentId=node2, updateCntr=1519, size=596, partHash=-1167688484], PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=false, consistentId=node1, updateCntr=1520, size=596, partHash=-1167688484]] Conflict partition: PartitionKeyV2 [grpId=-1903385190, grpName=CACHEGROUP_PARTICLE_1, partId=34] Partition instances: [PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=false, consistentId=node2, updateCntr=1539, size=596, partHash=-99631005], PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=true, consistentId=node1, updateCntr=1537, size=596, partHash=-1284437377]] Conflict partition: PartitionKeyV2 [grpId=770187303, grpName=CACHEGROUP_PARTICLE_1, partId=31] Partition instances: [PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=true, consistentId=node2, updateCntr=15, size=4, partHash=-1125172674], PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=false, consistentId=node1, updateCntr=16, size=4, partHash=-1125172674]] Conflict partition: PartitionKeyV2 [grpId=-1903385190, grpName=CACHEGROUP_PARTICLE_1, partId=39] Partition instances: [PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=true, consistentId=node2, updateCntr=1555, size=596, partHash=-40303136], PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=false, consistentId=node1, updateCntr=1556, size=596, partHash=-40303136]] Conflict partition: PartitionKeyV2 [grpId=-1903385190, grpName=CACHEGROUP_PARTICLE_1, partId=90] Partition instances: [PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=false, consistentId=node2, updateCntr=1557, size=596, partHash=-1295145299], PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=true, consistentId=node1, updateCntr=1556, size=596, partHash=-1221175703]] ... {code} was: {code:java} idle_verify check has finished, found 60 conflict partitions: [counterConflicts=45, hashConflicts=15] Update counter conflicts: Conflict partition: PartitionKeyV2 [grpId=-1903385190, grpName=CACHEGROUP_PARTICLE_1, partId=98] Partition instances: [PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=true, consistentId=node2, updateCntr=1519, size=596, partHash=-1167688484], PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=false, consistentId=node1, updateCntr=1520, size=596, partHash=-1167688484]] Conflict partition: PartitionKeyV2 [grpId=-1903385190, grpName=CACHEGROUP_PARTICLE_1, partId=34] Partition instances: [PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=false, consistentId=node2, updateCntr=1539, size=596, partHash=-99631005], PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=true, consistentId=node1, updateCntr=1537, size=596, partHash=-1284437377]] Conflict partition: PartitionKeyV2 [grpId=770187303, grpName=CACHEGROUP_PARTICLE_1, partId=31] Partition instances: [PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=true, consistentId=node2, updateCntr=15, size=4, partHash=-1125172674], PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=false, consistentId=node1, updateCntr=16, size=4, partHash=-1125172674]] Conflict partition: PartitionKeyV2 [grpId=-1903385190, grpName=CACHEGROUP_PARTICLE_1, partId=39] Partition instances: [PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=true, consistentId=node2, updateCntr=1555, size=596, partHash=-40303136], PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=false, consistentId=node1, updateCntr=1556, size=596, partHash=-40303136]] Conflict partition: PartitionKeyV2 [grpId=-1903385190, grpName=CACHEGROUP_PARTICLE_1, partId=90] Partition instances: [PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=false, consistentId=node2, updateCntr=1557, size=596, partHash=-1295145299], PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=true, consistentId=node1, updateCntr=1556, size=596, partHash=-1221175703]] ... {code} > After transaction load cluster inconsistent > --- > > Key: IGNITE-9905 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9905 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Bug > Components: persistence >Affects Versions: 2.7 >Reporter: ARomantsov >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.7 > > > Loaded data into the cluster using transactions consisting of two get / two > put > Test env: one server, two server node, one client > {code:java} > idle_verify check has finished, found 60 conflict partitions: > [counterConflicts=45, hashConflicts=15] > Update counter conflicts: > Conflict partition: PartitionKeyV2 [grpId=-1903385190, > grpName=CACHEGROUP_PARTICLE_1, partId=98] > Partition instances: [PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=true, > consistentId=node2, updateCntr=1519, size=596, partHash=-1167688484], >
[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-9905) After transaction load cluster inconsistent
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9905?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ARomantsov updated IGNITE-9905: --- Description: {code:java} idle_verify check has finished, found 60 conflict partitions: [counterConflicts=45, hashConflicts=15] Update counter conflicts: Conflict partition: PartitionKeyV2 [grpId=-1903385190, grpName=CACHEGROUP_PARTICLE_1, partId=98] Partition instances: [PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=true, consistentId=node2, updateCntr=1519, size=596, partHash=-1167688484], PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=false, consistentId=node1, updateCntr=1520, size=596, partHash=-1167688484]] Conflict partition: PartitionKeyV2 [grpId=-1903385190, grpName=CACHEGROUP_PARTICLE_1, partId=34] Partition instances: [PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=false, consistentId=node2, updateCntr=1539, size=596, partHash=-99631005], PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=true, consistentId=node1, updateCntr=1537, size=596, partHash=-1284437377]] Conflict partition: PartitionKeyV2 [grpId=770187303, grpName=CACHEGROUP_PARTICLE_1, partId=31] Partition instances: [PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=true, consistentId=node2, updateCntr=15, size=4, partHash=-1125172674], PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=false, consistentId=node1, updateCntr=16, size=4, partHash=-1125172674]] Conflict partition: PartitionKeyV2 [grpId=-1903385190, grpName=CACHEGROUP_PARTICLE_1, partId=39] Partition instances: [PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=true, consistentId=node2, updateCntr=1555, size=596, partHash=-40303136], PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=false, consistentId=node1, updateCntr=1556, size=596, partHash=-40303136]] Conflict partition: PartitionKeyV2 [grpId=-1903385190, grpName=CACHEGROUP_PARTICLE_1, partId=90] Partition instances: [PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=false, consistentId=node2, updateCntr=1557, size=596, partHash=-1295145299], PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=true, consistentId=node1, updateCntr=1556, size=596, partHash=-1221175703]] ... {code} was: {code:java} idle_verify check has finished, found 60 conflict partitions: [counterConflicts=45, hashConflicts=15] Update counter conflicts: Conflict partition: PartitionKeyV2 [grpId=-1903385190, grpName=CACHEGROUP_PARTICLE_1, partId=98] Partition instances: [PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=true, consistentId=node2, updateCntr=1519, size=596, partHash=-1167688484], PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=false, consistentId=node1, updateCntr=1520, size=596, partHash=-1167688484]] Conflict partition: PartitionKeyV2 [grpId=-1903385190, grpName=CACHEGROUP_PARTICLE_1, partId=34] Partition instances: [PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=false, consistentId=node2, updateCntr=1539, size=596, partHash=-99631005], PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=true, consistentId=node1, updateCntr=1537, size=596, partHash=-1284437377]] Conflict partition: PartitionKeyV2 [grpId=770187303, grpName=CACHEGROUP_PARTICLE_1, partId=31] Partition instances: [PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=true, consistentId=node2, updateCntr=15, size=4, partHash=-1125172674], PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=false, consistentId=node1, updateCntr=16, size=4, partHash=-1125172674]] Conflict partition: PartitionKeyV2 [grpId=-1903385190, grpName=CACHEGROUP_PARTICLE_1, partId=39] Partition instances: [PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=true, consistentId=node2, updateCntr=1555, size=596, partHash=-40303136], PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=false, consistentId=node1, updateCntr=1556, size=596, partHash=-40303136]] Conflict partition: PartitionKeyV2 [grpId=-1903385190, grpName=CACHEGROUP_PARTICLE_1, partId=90] Partition instances: [PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=false, consistentId=node2, updateCntr=1557, size=596, partHash=-1295145299], PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=true, consistentId=node1, updateCntr=1556, size=596, partHash=-1221175703]] ... {code} > After transaction load cluster inconsistent > --- > > Key: IGNITE-9905 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9905 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Bug > Components: persistence >Affects Versions: 2.7 >Reporter: ARomantsov >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.7 > > > {code:java} > idle_verify check has finished, found 60 conflict partitions: > [counterConflicts=45, hashConflicts=15] > Update counter conflicts: > Conflict partition: PartitionKeyV2 [grpId=-1903385190, > grpName=CACHEGROUP_PARTICLE_1, partId=98] > Partition instances: [PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=true, > consistentId=node2, updateCntr=1519, size=596, partHash=-1167688484], > PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=false, consistentId=node1, updateCntr=1520, > size=596, partHash=-1167688484]] > Conflict partition: PartitionKeyV2 [grpId=-1903385190, > grpName=CACHEGROUP_PARTICLE_1, partId=34] > Partition instances: [PartitionHashRecordV2
[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-9905) After transaction load cluster inconsistent
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9905?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ARomantsov updated IGNITE-9905: --- Description: {code:java} idle_verify check has finished, found 60 conflict partitions: [counterConflicts=45, hashConflicts=15] Update counter conflicts: Conflict partition: PartitionKeyV2 [grpId=-1903385190, grpName=CACHEGROUP_PARTICLE_1, partId=98] Partition instances: [PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=true, consistentId=node2, updateCntr=1519, size=596, partHash=-1167688484], PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=false, consistentId=node1, updateCntr=1520, size=596, partHash=-1167688484]] Conflict partition: PartitionKeyV2 [grpId=-1903385190, grpName=CACHEGROUP_PARTICLE_1, partId=34] Partition instances: [PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=false, consistentId=node2, updateCntr=1539, size=596, partHash=-99631005], PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=true, consistentId=node1, updateCntr=1537, size=596, partHash=-1284437377]] Conflict partition: PartitionKeyV2 [grpId=770187303, grpName=CACHEGROUP_PARTICLE_1, partId=31] Partition instances: [PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=true, consistentId=node2, updateCntr=15, size=4, partHash=-1125172674], PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=false, consistentId=node1, updateCntr=16, size=4, partHash=-1125172674]] Conflict partition: PartitionKeyV2 [grpId=-1903385190, grpName=CACHEGROUP_PARTICLE_1, partId=39] Partition instances: [PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=true, consistentId=node2, updateCntr=1555, size=596, partHash=-40303136], PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=false, consistentId=node1, updateCntr=1556, size=596, partHash=-40303136]] Conflict partition: PartitionKeyV2 [grpId=-1903385190, grpName=CACHEGROUP_PARTICLE_1, partId=90] Partition instances: [PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=false, consistentId=node2, updateCntr=1557, size=596, partHash=-1295145299], PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=true, consistentId=node1, updateCntr=1556, size=596, partHash=-1221175703]] ... {code} was: {code:java} idle_verify check has finished, found 60 conflict partitions: [counterConflicts=45, hashConflicts=15] Update counter conflicts: Conflict partition: PartitionKeyV2 [grpId=-1903385190, grpName=CACHEGROUP_PARTICLE_1, partId=98] Partition instances: [PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=true, consistentId=node2, updateCntr=1519, size=596, partHash=-1167688484], PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=false, consistentId=node1, updateCntr=1520, size=596, partHash=-1167688484]] Conflict partition: PartitionKeyV2 [grpId=-1903385190, grpName=CACHEGROUP_PARTICLE_1, partId=34] Partition instances: [PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=false, consistentId=node2, updateCntr=1539, size=596, partHash=-99631005], PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=true, consistentId=node1, updateCntr=1537, size=596, partHash=-1284437377]] Conflict partition: PartitionKeyV2 [grpId=770187303, grpName=CACHEGROUP_PARTICLE_1, partId=31] Partition instances: [PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=true, consistentId=node2, updateCntr=15, size=4, partHash=-1125172674], PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=false, consistentId=node1, updateCntr=16, size=4, partHash=-1125172674]] Conflict partition: PartitionKeyV2 [grpId=-1903385190, grpName=CACHEGROUP_PARTICLE_1, partId=39] Partition instances: [PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=true, consistentId=node2, updateCntr=1555, size=596, partHash=-40303136], PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=false, consistentId=node1, updateCntr=1556, size=596, partHash=-40303136]] Conflict partition: PartitionKeyV2 [grpId=-1903385190, grpName=CACHEGROUP_PARTICLE_1, partId=90] Partition instances: [PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=false, consistentId=node2, updateCntr=1557, size=596, partHash=-1295145299], PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=true, consistentId=node1, updateCntr=1556, size=596, partHash=-1221175703]] {code} > After transaction load cluster inconsistent > --- > > Key: IGNITE-9905 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9905 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Bug > Components: persistence >Affects Versions: 2.7 >Reporter: ARomantsov >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.7 > > > {code:java} > idle_verify check has finished, found 60 conflict partitions: > [counterConflicts=45, hashConflicts=15] > Update counter conflicts: > Conflict partition: PartitionKeyV2 [grpId=-1903385190, > grpName=CACHEGROUP_PARTICLE_1, partId=98] > Partition instances: [PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=true, > consistentId=node2, updateCntr=1519, size=596, partHash=-1167688484], > PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=false, consistentId=node1, updateCntr=1520, > size=596, partHash=-1167688484]] > Conflict partition: PartitionKeyV2 [grpId=-1903385190, > grpName=CACHEGROUP_PARTICLE_1, partId=34] > Partition instances: [PartitionHashRecordV2
[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-9905) After transaction load cluster inconsistent
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9905?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ARomantsov updated IGNITE-9905: --- Description: {code:java} idle_verify check has finished, found 60 conflict partitions: [counterConflicts=45, hashConflicts=15] Update counter conflicts: Conflict partition: PartitionKeyV2 [grpId=-1903385190, grpName=CACHEGROUP_PARTICLE_1, partId=98] Partition instances: [PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=true, consistentId=node2, updateCntr=1519, size=596, partHash=-1167688484], PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=false, consistentId=node1, updateCntr=1520, size=596, partHash=-1167688484]] Conflict partition: PartitionKeyV2 [grpId=-1903385190, grpName=CACHEGROUP_PARTICLE_1, partId=34] Partition instances: [PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=false, consistentId=node2, updateCntr=1539, size=596, partHash=-99631005], PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=true, consistentId=node1, updateCntr=1537, size=596, partHash=-1284437377]] Conflict partition: PartitionKeyV2 [grpId=770187303, grpName=CACHEGROUP_PARTICLE_1, partId=31] Partition instances: [PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=true, consistentId=node2, updateCntr=15, size=4, partHash=-1125172674], PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=false, consistentId=node1, updateCntr=16, size=4, partHash=-1125172674]] Conflict partition: PartitionKeyV2 [grpId=-1903385190, grpName=CACHEGROUP_PARTICLE_1, partId=39] Partition instances: [PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=true, consistentId=node2, updateCntr=1555, size=596, partHash=-40303136], PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=false, consistentId=node1, updateCntr=1556, size=596, partHash=-40303136]] Conflict partition: PartitionKeyV2 [grpId=-1903385190, grpName=CACHEGROUP_PARTICLE_1, partId=90] Partition instances: [PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=false, consistentId=node2, updateCntr=1557, size=596, partHash=-1295145299], PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=true, consistentId=node1, updateCntr=1556, size=596, partHash=-1221175703]] {code} was: One server, two nodes per server, one client Loaded data into the cluster using transactions consisting of two get / two put {code:java} idle_verify check has finished, found 60 conflict partitions: [counterConflicts=45, hashConflicts=15] Update counter conflicts: Conflict partition: PartitionKeyV2 [grpId=-1903385190, grpName=CACHEGROUP_PARTICLE_union-module_com.sbt.bm.ucp.common.dpl.model.dictionary.DServiceZone, partId=98] Partition instances: [PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=true, consistentId=node2, updateCntr=1519, size=596, partHash=-1167688484], PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=false, consistentId=node1, updateCntr=1520, size=596, partHash=-1167688484]] Conflict partition: PartitionKeyV2 [grpId=-1903385190, grpName=CACHEGROUP_PARTICLE_union-module_com.sbt.bm.ucp.common.dpl.model.dictionary.DServiceZone, partId=34] Partition instances: [PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=false, consistentId=node2, updateCntr=1539, size=596, partHash=-99631005], PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=true, consistentId=node1, updateCntr=1537, size=596, partHash=-1284437377]] Conflict partition: PartitionKeyV2 [grpId=770187303, grpName=CACHEGROUP_PARTICLE_currency-rates_com.sbt.cdm.api.model.dictionary.RKOKCostLevels, partId=31] Partition instances: [PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=true, consistentId=node2, updateCntr=15, size=4, partHash=-1125172674], PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=false, consistentId=node1, updateCntr=16, size=4, partHash=-1125172674]] Conflict partition: PartitionKeyV2 [grpId=-1903385190, grpName=CACHEGROUP_PARTICLE_union-module_com.sbt.bm.ucp.common.dpl.model.dictionary.DServiceZone, partId=39] Partition instances: [PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=true, consistentId=node2, updateCntr=1555, size=596, partHash=-40303136], PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=false, consistentId=node1, updateCntr=1556, size=596, partHash=-40303136]] Conflict partition: PartitionKeyV2 [grpId=-1903385190, grpName=CACHEGROUP_PARTICLE_union-module_com.sbt.bm.ucp.common.dpl.model.dictionary.DServiceZone, partId=90] Partition instances: [PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=false, consistentId=node2, updateCntr=1557, size=596, partHash=-1295145299], PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=true, consistentId=node1, updateCntr=1556, size=596, partHash=-1221175703]] Conflict partition: PartitionKeyV2 [grpId=-1903385190, grpName=CACHEGROUP_PARTICLE_union-module_com.sbt.bm.ucp.common.dpl.model.dictionary.DServiceZone, partId=28] Partition instances: [PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=true, consistentId=node2, updateCntr=1480, size=596, partHash=840625505], PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=false, consistentId=node1, updateCntr=1481, size=596, partHash=840625505]] Conflict partition: PartitionKeyV2 [grpId=-1903385190, grpName=CACHEGROUP_PARTICLE_union-module_com.sbt.bm.ucp.common.dpl.model.dictionary.DServiceZone, partId=29] Partition instances: [PartitionHashRecordV2 [isPrimary=true,