[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-11188) Optimize baseline autoadjustment for in-memory clusters with zero timeout
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16821244#comment-16821244 ] Dmitriy Govorukhin commented on IGNITE-11188: - [~ibessonov] Thanks for the contribution, merged to master. > Optimize baseline autoadjustment for in-memory clusters with zero timeout > - > > Key: IGNITE-11188 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11188 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Ivan Bessonov >Assignee: Anton Kalashnikov >Priority: Major > Labels: IEP-4, Phase-2 > Fix For: 2.8 > > > In current implementation (IGNITE-8571) zero-timeout case initiates two > partition map exchanges on join/leave node events. This could be improved so > that baseline is updated at the same time as join/leave event processing. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-11188) Optimize baseline autoadjustment for in-memory clusters with zero timeout
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16820983#comment-16820983 ] Anton Kalashnikov commented on IGNITE-11188: All of failed suites(Cache 2, JDBC Driver, Javadoc) are also failed in master. My changes are not reason of failed. > Optimize baseline autoadjustment for in-memory clusters with zero timeout > - > > Key: IGNITE-11188 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11188 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Ivan Bessonov >Assignee: Anton Kalashnikov >Priority: Major > Labels: IEP-4, Phase-2 > Fix For: 2.8 > > > In current implementation (IGNITE-8571) zero-timeout case initiates two > partition map exchanges on join/leave node events. This could be improved so > that baseline is updated at the same time as join/leave event processing. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-11188) Optimize baseline autoadjustment for in-memory clusters with zero timeout
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16820981#comment-16820981 ] Ignite TC Bot commented on IGNITE-11188: {panel:title=-- Run :: All: Possible Blockers|borderStyle=dashed|borderColor=#ccc|titleBGColor=#F7D6C1} {color:#d04437}Cache 2{color} [[tests 0 TIMEOUT , Exit Code |https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewLog.html?buildId=3639487]] * IgniteClientCacheStartFailoverTest.testClientStartCloseServersRestart (last started) {color:#d04437}JDBC Driver{color} [[tests 0 TIMEOUT , Exit Code |https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewLog.html?buildId=3639498]] * JdbcThinErrorsSelfTest.testInvalidBigDecimalFormat (last started) {color:#d04437}_Javadoc_{color} [[tests 0 BuildFailureOnMessage |https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewLog.html?buildId=3639496]] {panel} [TeamCity *-- Run :: All* Results|https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewLog.html?buildId=3633364buildTypeId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll] > Optimize baseline autoadjustment for in-memory clusters with zero timeout > - > > Key: IGNITE-11188 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11188 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Ivan Bessonov >Assignee: Anton Kalashnikov >Priority: Major > Labels: IEP-4, Phase-2 > Fix For: 2.8 > > > In current implementation (IGNITE-8571) zero-timeout case initiates two > partition map exchanges on join/leave node events. This could be improved so > that baseline is updated at the same time as join/leave event processing. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-11188) Optimize baseline autoadjustment for in-memory clusters with zero timeout
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16816414#comment-16816414 ] Ivan Bessonov commented on IGNITE-11188: [~akalashnikov] please take a look at my last commit and make it look better. There's also a very likely bug somewhere in "GridAffinityAssignmentCache" class after merge with IGNITE-10799, but I'm not sure. Affinity calculation looks broken, we need to at least test it. Thank you in advance! > Optimize baseline autoadjustment for in-memory clusters with zero timeout > - > > Key: IGNITE-11188 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11188 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Ivan Bessonov >Assignee: Anton Kalashnikov >Priority: Major > Labels: IEP-4, Phase-2 > Fix For: 2.8 > > > In current implementation (IGNITE-8571) zero-timeout case initiates two > partition map exchanges on join/leave node events. This could be improved so > that baseline is updated at the same time as join/leave event processing. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-11188) Optimize baseline autoadjustment for in-memory clusters with zero timeout
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16808854#comment-16808854 ] Ignite TC Bot commented on IGNITE-11188: {panel:title=-- Run :: All: No blockers found!|borderStyle=dashed|borderColor=#ccc|titleBGColor=#D6F7C1}{panel} [TeamCity *-- Run :: All* Results|https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewLog.html?buildId=3488515buildTypeId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll] > Optimize baseline autoadjustment for in-memory clusters with zero timeout > - > > Key: IGNITE-11188 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11188 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Ivan Bessonov >Assignee: Ivan Bessonov >Priority: Major > Labels: IEP-4, Phase-2 > Fix For: 2.8 > > > In current implementation (IGNITE-8571) zero-timeout case initiates two > partition map exchanges on join/leave node events. This could be improved so > that baseline is updated at the same time as join/leave event processing. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-11188) Optimize baseline autoadjustment for in-memory clusters with zero timeout
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16791441#comment-16791441 ] Ignite TC Bot commented on IGNITE-11188: {panel:title=-- Run :: All: No blockers found!|borderStyle=dashed|borderColor=#ccc|titleBGColor=#D6F7C1}{panel} [TeamCity *-- Run :: All* Results|https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewLog.html?buildId=3286254buildTypeId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll] > Optimize baseline autoadjustment for in-memory clusters with zero timeout > - > > Key: IGNITE-11188 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11188 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Ivan Bessonov >Assignee: Ivan Bessonov >Priority: Major > Labels: IEP-4, Phase-2 > Fix For: 2.8 > > > In current implementation (IGNITE-8571) zero-timeout case initiates two > partition map exchanges on join/leave node events. This could be improved so > that baseline is updated at the same time as join/leave event processing. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)