[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-7592) Dynamic cache with rebalanceDelay == -1 doesn't trigger late affinity assignment even after explicit rebalance is called on every node

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7592?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16717031#comment-16717031 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on IGNITE-7592: Github user Mmuzaf closed the pull request at:

[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-7592) Dynamic cache with rebalanceDelay == -1 doesn't trigger late affinity assignment even after explicit rebalance is called on every node

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7592?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16456126#comment-16456126 ] Maxim Muzafarov commented on IGNITE-7592: - [~avinogradov], [~ilantukh], Changes ready for

[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-7592) Dynamic cache with rebalanceDelay == -1 doesn't trigger late affinity assignment even after explicit rebalance is called on every node

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7592?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16453514#comment-16453514 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on IGNITE-7592: GitHub user Mmuzaf opened a pull request:

[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-7592) Dynamic cache with rebalanceDelay == -1 doesn't trigger late affinity assignment even after explicit rebalance is called on every node

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7592?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16452572#comment-16452572 ] Anton Vinogradov commented on IGNITE-7592: -- have no objections > Dynamic cache with

[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-7592) Dynamic cache with rebalanceDelay == -1 doesn't trigger late affinity assignment even after explicit rebalance is called on every node

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7592?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16452553#comment-16452553 ] Alexey Goncharuk commented on IGNITE-7592: -- Guys, let's propagate the result of rebalance future

[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-7592) Dynamic cache with rebalanceDelay == -1 doesn't trigger late affinity assignment even after explicit rebalance is called on every node

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7592?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16452374#comment-16452374 ] Anton Vinogradov commented on IGNITE-7592: -- [~ilantukh], Agree with your proposal, but ... Do

[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-7592) Dynamic cache with rebalanceDelay == -1 doesn't trigger late affinity assignment even after explicit rebalance is called on every node

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7592?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16452087#comment-16452087 ] Ilya Lantukh commented on IGNITE-7592: -- In this case I suggest to extend public API in one of the

[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-7592) Dynamic cache with rebalanceDelay == -1 doesn't trigger late affinity assignment even after explicit rebalance is called on every node

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7592?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16452047#comment-16452047 ] Anton Vinogradov commented on IGNITE-7592: -- [~ilantukh], Looks like not an issue due to semantic

[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-7592) Dynamic cache with rebalanceDelay == -1 doesn't trigger late affinity assignment even after explicit rebalance is called on every node

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7592?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16449907#comment-16449907 ] Maxim Muzafarov commented on IGNITE-7592: - [~ilantukh], >From my point of view, we should not