[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-5714) Implementation of suspend/resume for pessimistic transactions
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5714?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Maxim Muzafarov updated IGNITE-5714: Labels: iep-34 important (was: iep-34) > Implementation of suspend/resume for pessimistic transactions > - > > Key: IGNITE-5714 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5714 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: general >Reporter: Alexey Kuznetsov >Assignee: Aleksey Plekhanov >Priority: Major > Labels: iep-34, important > Fix For: 2.8 > > Time Spent: 4h 40m > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > Support transaction suspend()\resume() operations for pessimistic > transactions. Resume can be called in another thread. >_+But there is a problem+_: Imagine, we started pessimistic transaction in > thread T1 and then perform put operation, which leads to sending > GridDistributedLockRequest to another node. Lock request contains thread id > of the transaction. Then we call suspend, resume in another thread and we > also must send messages to other nodes to change thread id. > It seems complicated task.It’s better to get rid of sending thread id to the > nodes. > We can use transaction xid on other nodes instead of thread id. Xid is sent > to nodes in GridDistributedLockRequest#nearXidVer >_+Proposed solution+_ : On remote nodes instead of thread id of near > transaction GridDistributedLockRequest#threadId use its xid > GridDistributedLockRequest#nearXidVer. > Remove usages of near transaction's thread id on remote nodes. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-5714) Implementation of suspend/resume for pessimistic transactions
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5714?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Aleksey Plekhanov updated IGNITE-5714: -- Fix Version/s: 2.8 > Implementation of suspend/resume for pessimistic transactions > - > > Key: IGNITE-5714 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5714 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: general >Reporter: Alexey Kuznetsov >Assignee: Aleksey Plekhanov >Priority: Major > Labels: iep-34 > Fix For: 2.8 > > Time Spent: 4h 40m > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > Support transaction suspend()\resume() operations for pessimistic > transactions. Resume can be called in another thread. >_+But there is a problem+_: Imagine, we started pessimistic transaction in > thread T1 and then perform put operation, which leads to sending > GridDistributedLockRequest to another node. Lock request contains thread id > of the transaction. Then we call suspend, resume in another thread and we > also must send messages to other nodes to change thread id. > It seems complicated task.It’s better to get rid of sending thread id to the > nodes. > We can use transaction xid on other nodes instead of thread id. Xid is sent > to nodes in GridDistributedLockRequest#nearXidVer >_+Proposed solution+_ : On remote nodes instead of thread id of near > transaction GridDistributedLockRequest#threadId use its xid > GridDistributedLockRequest#nearXidVer. > Remove usages of near transaction's thread id on remote nodes. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.14#76016)
[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-5714) Implementation of suspend/resume for pessimistic transactions
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5714?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Aleksey Plekhanov updated IGNITE-5714: -- Labels: iep-34 (was: ) > Implementation of suspend/resume for pessimistic transactions > - > > Key: IGNITE-5714 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5714 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: general >Reporter: Alexey Kuznetsov >Assignee: Aleksey Plekhanov >Priority: Major > Labels: iep-34 > > Support transaction suspend()\resume() operations for pessimistic > transactions. Resume can be called in another thread. >_+But there is a problem+_: Imagine, we started pessimistic transaction in > thread T1 and then perform put operation, which leads to sending > GridDistributedLockRequest to another node. Lock request contains thread id > of the transaction. Then we call suspend, resume in another thread and we > also must send messages to other nodes to change thread id. > It seems complicated task.It’s better to get rid of sending thread id to the > nodes. > We can use transaction xid on other nodes instead of thread id. Xid is sent > to nodes in GridDistributedLockRequest#nearXidVer >_+Proposed solution+_ : On remote nodes instead of thread id of near > transaction GridDistributedLockRequest#threadId use its xid > GridDistributedLockRequest#nearXidVer. > Remove usages of near transaction's thread id on remote nodes. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-5714) Implementation of suspend/resume for pessimistic transactions
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5714?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nikolay Izhikov updated IGNITE-5714: Fix Version/s: (was: 2.7) > Implementation of suspend/resume for pessimistic transactions > - > > Key: IGNITE-5714 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5714 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: general >Reporter: Alexey Kuznetsov >Assignee: Alexey Kuznetsov >Priority: Major > > Support transaction suspend()\resume() operations for pessimistic > transactions. Resume can be called in another thread. >_+But there is a problem+_: Imagine, we started pessimistic transaction in > thread T1 and then perform put operation, which leads to sending > GridDistributedLockRequest to another node. Lock request contains thread id > of the transaction. Then we call suspend, resume in another thread and we > also must send messages to other nodes to change thread id. > It seems complicated task.It’s better to get rid of sending thread id to the > nodes. > We can use transaction xid on other nodes instead of thread id. Xid is sent > to nodes in GridDistributedLockRequest#nearXidVer >_+Proposed solution+_ : On remote nodes instead of thread id of near > transaction GridDistributedLockRequest#threadId use its xid > GridDistributedLockRequest#nearXidVer. > Remove usages of near transaction's thread id on remote nodes. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-5714) Implementation of suspend/resume for pessimistic transactions
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5714?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dmitriy Pavlov updated IGNITE-5714: --- Fix Version/s: (was: 2.6) 2.7 > Implementation of suspend/resume for pessimistic transactions > - > > Key: IGNITE-5714 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5714 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: general >Reporter: Alexey Kuznetsov >Assignee: Alexey Kuznetsov >Priority: Major > Fix For: 2.7 > > > Support transaction suspend()\resume() operations for pessimistic > transactions. Resume can be called in another thread. >_+But there is a problem+_: Imagine, we started pessimistic transaction in > thread T1 and then perform put operation, which leads to sending > GridDistributedLockRequest to another node. Lock request contains thread id > of the transaction. Then we call suspend, resume in another thread and we > also must send messages to other nodes to change thread id. > It seems complicated task.It’s better to get rid of sending thread id to the > nodes. > We can use transaction xid on other nodes instead of thread id. Xid is sent > to nodes in GridDistributedLockRequest#nearXidVer >_+Proposed solution+_ : On remote nodes instead of thread id of near > transaction GridDistributedLockRequest#threadId use its xid > GridDistributedLockRequest#nearXidVer. > Remove usages of near transaction's thread id on remote nodes. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-5714) Implementation of suspend/resume for pessimistic transactions
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5714?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alexey Kuznetsov updated IGNITE-5714: - Description: Support transaction suspend()\resume() operations for pessimistic transactions. Resume can be called in another thread. _+But there is a problem+_: Imagine, we started pessimistic transaction in thread T1 and then perform put operation, which leads to sending GridDistributedLockRequest to another node. Lock request contains thread id of the transaction. Then we call suspend, resume in another thread and we also must send messages to other nodes to change thread id. It seems complicated task.It’s better to get rid of sending thread id to the nodes. We can use transaction xid on other nodes instead of thread id. Xid is sent to nodes in GridDistributedLockRequest#nearXidVer _+Proposed solution+_ : On remote nodes instead of thread id of near transaction GridDistributedLockRequest#threadId use its xid GridDistributedLockRequest#nearXidVer. Remove usages of near transaction's thread id on remote nodes. was: Support transaction suspend()\resume() operations for pessimistic transactions. Resume can be called in another thread. _+But there is a problem+_: Imagine, we started pessimistic transaction in thread T1 and then perform put operation, which leads to sending GridDistributedLockRequest to another node. Lock request contains thread id of the transaction. Then we call suspend, resume in another thread and we also must send messages to other nodes to change thread id. It seems complicated task.It’s better to get rid of sending thread id to the nodes. We can use transaction xid on other nodes instead of thread id. Xid is sent to nodes in GridDistributedLockRequest#nearXidVer _+Proposed solution+_ : On remote nodes instead of thread id of near transaction GridDistributedLockRequest#threadId use its xid GridDistributedLockRequest#nearXidVer. Remove usages of near transaction's thread id on remote nodes. Discussion on dev list can be found [here|http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/IGNITE-5714-Design-proposal-of-suspend-resume-for-pessimistic-tx-tt27410.html] > Implementation of suspend/resume for pessimistic transactions > - > > Key: IGNITE-5714 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5714 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: general >Reporter: Alexey Kuznetsov >Assignee: Alexey Kuznetsov >Priority: Major > Fix For: 2.6 > > > Support transaction suspend()\resume() operations for pessimistic > transactions. Resume can be called in another thread. >_+But there is a problem+_: Imagine, we started pessimistic transaction in > thread T1 and then perform put operation, which leads to sending > GridDistributedLockRequest to another node. Lock request contains thread id > of the transaction. Then we call suspend, resume in another thread and we > also must send messages to other nodes to change thread id. > It seems complicated task.It’s better to get rid of sending thread id to the > nodes. > We can use transaction xid on other nodes instead of thread id. Xid is sent > to nodes in GridDistributedLockRequest#nearXidVer >_+Proposed solution+_ : On remote nodes instead of thread id of near > transaction GridDistributedLockRequest#threadId use its xid > GridDistributedLockRequest#nearXidVer. > Remove usages of near transaction's thread id on remote nodes. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-5714) Implementation of suspend/resume for pessimistic transactions
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5714?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alexey Kuznetsov updated IGNITE-5714: - Fix Version/s: 2.6 > Implementation of suspend/resume for pessimistic transactions > - > > Key: IGNITE-5714 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5714 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: general >Reporter: Alexey Kuznetsov >Assignee: Alexey Kuznetsov >Priority: Major > Fix For: 2.6 > > > Support transaction suspend()\resume() operations for pessimistic > transactions. Resume can be called in another thread. >_+But there is a problem+_: Imagine, we started pessimistic transaction in > thread T1 and then perform put operation, which leads to sending > GridDistributedLockRequest to another node. Lock request contains thread id > of the transaction. Then we call suspend, resume in another thread and we > also must send messages to other nodes to change thread id. > It seems complicated task.It’s better to get rid of sending thread id to the > nodes. > We can use transaction xid on other nodes instead of thread id. Xid is sent > to nodes in GridDistributedLockRequest#nearXidVer >_+Proposed solution+_ : On remote nodes instead of thread id of near > transaction GridDistributedLockRequest#threadId use its xid > GridDistributedLockRequest#nearXidVer. > Remove usages of near transaction's thread id on remote nodes. > Discussion on dev list can be found > [here|http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/IGNITE-5714-Design-proposal-of-suspend-resume-for-pessimistic-tx-tt27410.html] -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-5714) Implementation of suspend/resume for pessimistic transactions
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5714?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alexey Kuznetsov updated IGNITE-5714: - Description: Support transaction suspend()\resume() operations for pessimistic transactions. Resume can be called in another thread. _+But there is a problem+_: Imagine, we started pessimistic transaction in thread T1 and then perform put operation, which leads to sending GridDistributedLockRequest to another node. Lock request contains thread id of the transaction. Then we call suspend, resume in another thread and we also must send messages to other nodes to change thread id. It seems complicated task.It’s better to get rid of sending thread id to the nodes. We can use transaction xid on other nodes instead of thread id. Xid is sent to nodes in GridDistributedLockRequest#nearXidVer _+Proposed solution+_ : On remote nodes instead of thread id of near transaction GridDistributedLockRequest#threadId use its xid GridDistributedLockRequest#nearXidVer. Remove usages of near transaction's thread id on remote nodes. Discussion on dev list can be found [here|http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/IGNITE-5714-Design-proposal-of-suspend-resume-for-pessimistic-tx-tt27410.html] was: Support transaction suspend()\resume() operations for pessimistic transactions. Resume can be called in another thread. _+But there is a problem+_: Imagine, we started pessimistic transaction in thread T1 and then perform put operation, which leads to sending GridDistributedLockRequest to another node. Lock request contains thread id of the transaction. Then we call suspend, resume in another thread and we also must send messages to other nodes to change thread id. It seems complicated task.It’s better to get rid of sending thread id to the nodes. We can use transaction xid on other nodes instead of thread id. Xid is sent to nodes in GridDistributedLockRequest#nearXidVer _+Proposed solution+_ : On remote nodes instead of thread id of near transaction GridDistributedLockRequest#threadId use its xid GridDistributedLockRequest#nearXidVer. Remove usages of near transaction's thread id on remote nodes. > Implementation of suspend/resume for pessimistic transactions > - > > Key: IGNITE-5714 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5714 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: general >Reporter: Alexey Kuznetsov >Assignee: Alexey Kuznetsov >Priority: Major > Fix For: 2.6 > > > Support transaction suspend()\resume() operations for pessimistic > transactions. Resume can be called in another thread. >_+But there is a problem+_: Imagine, we started pessimistic transaction in > thread T1 and then perform put operation, which leads to sending > GridDistributedLockRequest to another node. Lock request contains thread id > of the transaction. Then we call suspend, resume in another thread and we > also must send messages to other nodes to change thread id. > It seems complicated task.It’s better to get rid of sending thread id to the > nodes. > We can use transaction xid on other nodes instead of thread id. Xid is sent > to nodes in GridDistributedLockRequest#nearXidVer >_+Proposed solution+_ : On remote nodes instead of thread id of near > transaction GridDistributedLockRequest#threadId use its xid > GridDistributedLockRequest#nearXidVer. > Remove usages of near transaction's thread id on remote nodes. > Discussion on dev list can be found > [here|http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/IGNITE-5714-Design-proposal-of-suspend-resume-for-pessimistic-tx-tt27410.html] -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-5714) Implementation of suspend/resume for pessimistic transactions
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5714?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nikolay Izhikov updated IGNITE-5714: Summary: Implementation of suspend/resume for pessimistic transactions (was: Context switching for pessimistic transactions) > Implementation of suspend/resume for pessimistic transactions > - > > Key: IGNITE-5714 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5714 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: general >Reporter: Alexey Kuznetsov >Assignee: Alexey Kuznetsov >Priority: Major > > Support transaction suspend()\resume() operations for pessimistic > transactions. Resume can be called in another thread. >_+But there is a problem+_: Imagine, we started pessimistic transaction in > thread T1 and then perform put operation, which leads to sending > GridDistributedLockRequest to another node. Lock request contains thread id > of the transaction. Then we call suspend, resume in another thread and we > also must send messages to other nodes to change thread id. > It seems complicated task.It’s better to get rid of sending thread id to the > nodes. > We can use transaction xid on other nodes instead of thread id. Xid is sent > to nodes in GridDistributedLockRequest#nearXidVer >_+Proposed solution+_ : On remote nodes instead of thread id of near > transaction GridDistributedLockRequest#threadId use its xid > GridDistributedLockRequest#nearXidVer. > Remove usages of near transaction's thread id on remote nodes. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
