[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9570?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dawid Weiss updated LUCENE-9570:
Description:
Review and correct all the javadocs before they're messed up by automatic
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9570?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dawid Weiss updated LUCENE-9570:
Description:
Review and correct all the javadocs before they're messed up by automatic
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9570?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dawid Weiss updated LUCENE-9570:
Description:
Review and correct all the javadocs before they're messed up by automatic
Dawid Weiss created LUCENE-9654:
---
Summary: Expressions module gramar antlr code regeneration missing
Key: LUCENE-9654
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9654
Project: Lucene - Core
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9570?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dawid Weiss updated LUCENE-9570:
Description:
Review and correct all the javadocs before they're messed up by automatic
zacharymorn commented on pull request #2052:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2052#issuecomment-753560734
Hi @dweiss, for the JDK compiler issue, I ended up submitting a bug report
to open jdk (internal review id 9068426) as I'm hoping to be able to refer to
this issue in
zacharymorn commented on pull request #2052:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2052#issuecomment-753557228
Hi Uwe, I've gone ahead and pushed a commit for the following:
1. Add checksum computation
2. Add a new test to exercise the DirectIODirectory with actual index
zacharymorn removed a comment on pull request #2052:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2052#issuecomment-753556939
Hi Uwe, I've gone ahead and pushed a commit for the following:
1. Add checksum
This is an
zacharymorn commented on pull request #2052:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2052#issuecomment-753556939
Hi Uwe, I've gone ahead and pushed a commit for the following:
1. Add checksum
This is an automated
uschindler commented on pull request #2176:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2176#issuecomment-753547873
I fixed the rmeinaing TODOs regarding a safe close of *all* segments, when
exceptions on `map()` occur. When closing the master IndexInput, we also make
sure to unmap
uschindler edited a comment on pull request #2176:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2176#issuecomment-753511728
@dweiss I found a workaround by adding the include/excludes as we use in Ant
build. Why were those removed? Should I maybe reopen a new issue to add them
back in
uschindler edited a comment on pull request #2176:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2176#issuecomment-753512086
FYI, after I was able to run tests in a more convenient way, I figured out
that some tests fail from time to time because of using `HandleTrackingFS`. I
disabled
uschindler commented on pull request #2176:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2176#issuecomment-753512086
FYI, after I was able to run tests in a more convenient way, I figured out
that some tests fail from time to time because of using `HandleTrackingFS`. I
disabled all
uschindler edited a comment on pull request #2176:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2176#issuecomment-753511728
@dweiss I found a workaround by adding the include/excludes as we use in Ant
build. Why were those removed? Should I maybe reopen a new issue.
I have the
uschindler commented on pull request #2176:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2176#issuecomment-753511728
@dweiss I found a workaround by adding the include/excludes as we use in Ant
build. Why were those removed? Should I maybe reopen a new issue.
I have the feeling
uschindler edited a comment on pull request #2176:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2176#issuecomment-753503210
@dweiss I need your help here. There is one thing that drives me crazy: with
the changes (actually adding `--add-modules jdk.incubator.foreign` to the test
uschindler edited a comment on pull request #2176:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2176#issuecomment-753503210
@dweiss I need your help here. There is one thing that drives me crazy: with
the changes (actually adding `--add-modules jdk.incubator.foreign` to the test
uschindler commented on pull request #2176:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2176#issuecomment-753503210
@dweiss I need your help here. There is one thing that drives me crazy: with
the changes (actually adding `--add-modules", "jdk.incubator.foreign` to the
test command
uschindler edited a comment on pull request #2176:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2176#issuecomment-753492065
> Very exciting! Thank you for leading the way here, Uwe.
>
>> The most horrible thing I have seen is that our CFS file format starts
the "inner" files
uschindler commented on pull request #2176:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2176#issuecomment-753492065
> Very exciting! Thank you for leading the way here, Uwe.
>
>> The most horrible thing I have seen is that our CFS file format starts
the "inner" files totally
msokolov commented on pull request #2176:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2176#issuecomment-753491649
Very exciting! Thank you for leading the way here, Uwe.
> The most horrible thing I have seen is that our CFS file format starts the
"inner" files totally unaligned.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9653?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-9653:
--
Summary: Investigate usage of incubating jdk.incubator.foreign for
MMapDirectory (was:
Uwe Schindler created LUCENE-9653:
-
Summary: Imvestigate using of incubating jdk.incubator.foreign for
MMapDirectory
Key: LUCENE-9653
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9653
Project:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9563?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17257418#comment-17257418
]
Michael Sokolov commented on LUCENE-9563:
-
> I don't know about emacs but a quick Google search
jpountz commented on pull request #2176:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2176#issuecomment-753490290
> In future we should throw away on coping/loading our stuff to heap and
maybe throw away IndexInput completely and base our code fully on random
access. The new
uschindler opened a new pull request #2176:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2176
This is just a draft PR for a first insight on memory maaping improvements
in JDK 16+.
Some background information: Starting with JDK-14, there is a new incubating
module
Ishan Chattopadhyaya created SOLR-15065:
---
Summary: Migration guides for using packages instead of contribs
Key: SOLR-15065
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15065
Project: Solr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15065?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17257377#comment-17257377
]
Ishan Chattopadhyaya commented on SOLR-15065:
-
Ping [~rohitbemax], FYI.
> Migration guides
28 matches
Mail list logo
