zacharymorn commented on a change in pull request #128:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/128#discussion_r641274199
##
File path: lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/CheckIndex.java
##
@@ -3720,6 +3957,20 @@ public static Options parseOptions(String[] args) {
donnerpeter commented on pull request #2499:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2499#issuecomment-850121178
@dweiss @rmuir I'd be grateful for an opinion on this PR and whether Lucene
8.9 needs this change at all.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
dsmiley commented on a change in pull request #155:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/155#discussion_r641254711
##
File path:
lucene/queryparser/src/test/org/apache/lucene/queryparser/xml/TestCoreParser.java
##
@@ -201,6 +206,39 @@ public void
glawson0 commented on a change in pull request #157:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/157#discussion_r641212886
##
File path:
lucene/analysis/common/src/java/org/apache/lucene/analysis/core/FlattenGraphFilter.java
##
@@ -193,14 +194,25 @@ private boolean
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9963?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17352935#comment-17352935
]
Geoffrey Lawson commented on LUCENE-9963:
-
I've created a draft pull request for the fix:
glawson0 opened a new pull request #157:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/157
# Description
There are various situations were the flatten graph filter may throw an
exception or drop tokens due to mishandling of holes in the analysis graph. The
primary causes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9507?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mayya Sharipova resolved LUCENE-9507.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> Custom order for leaves in DirectoryReader, IndexWriter and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9507?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mayya Sharipova updated LUCENE-9507:
Fix Version/s: 8.9
main (9.0)
> Custom order for leaves in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mayya Sharipova updated LUCENE-9935:
Fix Version/s: 8.9
> Bulk merges for stored fields when index sorting is enabled
>
dweiss commented on a change in pull request #156:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/156#discussion_r640819830
##
File path: gradle/publishing/defaults-maven.gradle
##
@@ -209,11 +214,11 @@ configure(subprojects.findAll { it.path in
rootProject.published }) { prj ->
dweiss opened a new pull request #156:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/156
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9937?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Julie Tibshirani updated LUCENE-9937:
-
Description:
I hooked up our HNSW implementation to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9625?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17352621#comment-17352621
]
Michael Sokolov commented on LUCENE-9625:
-
Yes, once we have a publicly-available release I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9625?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17352600#comment-17352600
]
Julie Tibshirani commented on LUCENE-9625:
--
I somehow completely missed this before posting my
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9204?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17352589#comment-17352589
]
Michael Gibney commented on LUCENE-9204:
{quote}Intervals automatically rewrite disjunctions
dweiss commented on pull request #128:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/128#issuecomment-849741666
bq. LOL!! Now what am I going to do with my 117 remaining cores!!
I think this is very appropriate:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Core_War
--
This is an automated
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nicola Buso updated LUCENE-9979:
Attachment: 0001-Implement-negate-facet-path-in-DrillDownQuery.patch
> Implement negation of
Nicola Buso created LUCENE-9979:
---
Summary: Implement negation of facet path in DrillDownQuery
Key: LUCENE-9979
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9979
Project: Lucene - Core
gsmiller commented on pull request #149:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/149#issuecomment-849695286
Thanks for taking this on @sqshq!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9204?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17352541#comment-17352541
]
Alan Woodward commented on LUCENE-9204:
---
> The "the big bad wolf" example (in ES docs above) is
gsmiller commented on a change in pull request #149:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/149#discussion_r640649039
##
File path:
lucene/facet/src/java/org/apache/lucene/facet/taxonomy/TaxonomyFacets.java
##
@@ -110,17 +109,10 @@ public boolean siblingsLoaded() {
msokolov commented on pull request #128:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/128#issuecomment-849694198
Not bitcoin mining I hope
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 8:56 AM Michael McCandless ***@***.***>
wrote:
> -threadCount currently only supports up to 11 threads. Value
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9204?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17352537#comment-17352537
]
Michael Gibney commented on LUCENE-9204:
[~romseygeek], [~mikemccand]: on the topic of comparing
mikemccand commented on pull request #128:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/128#issuecomment-849681533
Phew, aha! I caught my mistake! When I ran `CheckIndex`, I failed to pass
the `.broken` index -- I was just checking the original (presumably NOT
corrupt) index. I reran
martin-huber commented on pull request #1608:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/1608#issuecomment-849677976
@bruno-roustant we tried to integrate your FileEncryptingDirectory in our
use case.
We before already did own attempts for a similar goal and in order to test
it
mikemccand commented on pull request #128:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/128#issuecomment-849677698
OK, I have good news and bad news.
Good news first! I wrote a [simple little Python
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17352508#comment-17352508
]
Martin Huber edited comment on LUCENE-9379 at 5/27/21, 2:15 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17352508#comment-17352508
]
Martin Huber commented on LUCENE-9379:
--
[~broustant] - one very valid use case that is not
mikemccand commented on pull request #128:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/128#issuecomment-849627976
OK I re-ran with the latest PR and I LOVE the output -- the lines come as
each check finishes, so you can see what is fast/slow. It seems postings is
slowest, preceded by doc
mikemccand commented on a change in pull request #128:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/128#discussion_r640598779
##
File path: lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/CheckIndex.java
##
@@ -3720,6 +3957,20 @@ public static Options parseOptions(String[] args) {
romseygeek commented on pull request #155:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/155#issuecomment-849612166
> Do we need a MIGRATE.txt entry explaining the situation?
Yes, and a CHANGES as well, which I always forget to do. Thanks!
--
This is an automated message from the
mikemccand commented on pull request #128:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/128#issuecomment-849611238
> -threadCount currently only supports up to 11 threads. Value higher than
that will be capped.
LOL!! Now what am I going to do with my 117 remaining cores!!
--
This
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17352384#comment-17352384
]
Tomoko Uchida commented on LUCENE-9448:
---
I opened LUCENE-9978 to explore the possibility, also
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17352381#comment-17352381
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-9448:
-
I think so. This requires changes in how the distribution is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17352380#comment-17352380
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-9448:
-
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8143?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17352363#comment-17352363
]
Alan Woodward commented on LUCENE-8143:
---
I opened a new PR:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9978?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17352359#comment-17352359
]
Tomoko Uchida commented on LUCENE-9978:
---
First of all, we need to decide if distributing Luke as a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9978?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tomoko Uchida updated LUCENE-9978:
--
Summary: [DISSCUSS] Make Luke a standalone package distribution (was:
[DISCUSS] Make Luke as
Tomoko Uchida created LUCENE-9978:
-
Summary: [DISCUSS] Make Luke as a standalone package distribution
Key: LUCENE-9978
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9978
Project: Lucene - Core
romseygeek commented on pull request #155:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/155#issuecomment-849492633
I added some tests to the complex query parser and xml query parser to
ensure that top-level boosts are still correctly applied. Other than that,
this is pretty simple, mostly
romseygeek opened a new pull request #155:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/155
Boosts are ignored on inner span queries, and top-level boosts can
be applied by using a normal BoostQuery, so SpanBoostQuery
itself is redundant and trappy. This commit removes it entirely.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17352320#comment-17352320
]
Tomoko Uchida commented on LUCENE-9448:
---
I would prefer a standalone Luke package to current
zacharymorn commented on pull request #128:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/128#issuecomment-849375766
> There is a typo in "deleteions"?
Fixed.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
dweiss commented on pull request #128:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/128#issuecomment-849356353
There is a typo in "deleteions"?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17352293#comment-17352293
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-9448:
-
I don't think there is any decision on this, Tomoko. What do
45 matches
Mail list logo
