[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17353645#comment-17353645
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-9379:
-
As always, you can count on arch to have some good user-level
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17353644#comment-17353644
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-9379:
-
Sorry, the above comment is really wrong. Please see my
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9981?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17353637#comment-17353637
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-9981:
-
Before we {{det(reverse())}} this automaton to compute the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9981?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-9981:
Attachment: LUCENE-9981_test.patch
> CompiledAutomaton.getCommonSuffix can be extraordinarily
gsmiller commented on a change in pull request #159:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/159#discussion_r641859710
##
File path: lucene/facet/src/java/org/apache/lucene/facet/DrillSideways.java
##
@@ -335,10 +342,22 @@ protected boolean scoreSubDocsAtOnce() {
/**
Robert Muir created LUCENE-9981:
---
Summary: CompiledAutomaton.getCommonSuffix can be extraordinarily
slow, even with default maxDeterminizedStates limit
Key: LUCENE-9981
URL:
sejal-pawar commented on a change in pull request #159:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/159#discussion_r641856799
##
File path: lucene/facet/src/java/org/apache/lucene/facet/DrillSideways.java
##
@@ -335,10 +342,22 @@ protected boolean scoreSubDocsAtOnce() {
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9945?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17353635#comment-17353635
]
Sejal Pawar commented on LUCENE-9945:
-
Pull request: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/159
>
sejal-pawar commented on a change in pull request #159:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/159#discussion_r641856799
##
File path: lucene/facet/src/java/org/apache/lucene/facet/DrillSideways.java
##
@@ -335,10 +342,22 @@ protected boolean scoreSubDocsAtOnce() {
gsmiller commented on a change in pull request #159:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/159#discussion_r641852899
##
File path: lucene/facet/src/java/org/apache/lucene/facet/DrillSideways.java
##
@@ -335,10 +342,22 @@ protected boolean scoreSubDocsAtOnce() {
/**
gsmiller commented on a change in pull request #138:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/138#discussion_r641848546
##
File path: lucene/facet/src/java/org/apache/lucene/facet/DrillDownQuery.java
##
@@ -170,16 +185,36 @@ private BooleanQuery getBooleanQuery() {
sejal-pawar opened a new pull request #159:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/159
# Description
(From [LUCENE-9945](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9945))
The DrillSideways logic currently encapsulates, 1) the creation of multiple
FacetsCollector
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gautam Worah updated LUCENE-9964:
-
Issue Type: Bug (was: Improvement)
> FacetResult.labelValues.value is not accurate for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9945?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sejal Pawar updated LUCENE-9945:
Attachment: (was: LUCENE-9945.patch)
> Extend DrillSideways to support exposing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9945?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sejal Pawar updated LUCENE-9945:
Attachment: LUCENE-9945.patch
> Extend DrillSideways to support exposing FacetCollectors directly
rmuir commented on pull request #2499:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2499#issuecomment-850699447
I'm sorry i've been nonresponsive, been crazy busy, just came up for air
now. Thank you for backporting this to 8.x! Great improvements to get out there
to the users now.
gautamworah96 commented on a change in pull request #138:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/138#discussion_r641822305
##
File path: lucene/facet/src/java/org/apache/lucene/facet/DrillDownQuery.java
##
@@ -170,15 +184,43 @@ private BooleanQuery getBooleanQuery() {
dnhatn commented on pull request #158:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/158#issuecomment-850650666
@mikemccand Would you mind taking a look? Thank you!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
dnhatn opened a new pull request #158:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/158
If we fail to delete files that belong to a commit point, then we will
expose that deleted commit in the next calls of
`IndexDeletionPolicy#onCommit()`. I think we should never expose those deleted
Nhat Nguyen created LUCENE-9980:
---
Summary: Do not expose deleted commits in
IndexDeletionPolicy#onCommit
Key: LUCENE-9980
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9980
Project: Lucene - Core
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9687?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17353510#comment-17353510
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-9687:
-
Commit
donnerpeter merged pull request #2499:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2499
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this
dweiss commented on pull request #2499:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2499#issuecomment-850444097
Hi @donnerpeter ! I think it's a change that is beneficial for folks who use
Hunspell and if you've already put the effort to backport, why not apply it?
--
This is an
gerlowskija merged pull request #2501:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2501
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9589?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jan Høydahl resolved LUCENE-9589.
-
Fix Version/s: main (9.0)
Resolution: Fixed
> Swedish Minimal Stemmer
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9589?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17353316#comment-17353316
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-9589:
-
Commit
janhoy merged pull request #136:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/136
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please
rmuir commented on pull request #128:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/128#issuecomment-850340290
I'm gonna throw out the crazy idea to make `-fast` the new default. The
previous `-slow` could be moved to `-slower` and the previous current behavior
could be activated by `-slow`.
rmuir commented on pull request #128:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/128#issuecomment-850335925
> The python tool looks very cool and thanks for testing it! One issue
though is that this bit flipping is causing checksum integrity check failures
before the concurrent segment
rmuir commented on pull request #128:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/128#issuecomment-850330270
> I was finally able to rebuild my local index with wikibigall generating 15
segments, and performed 2 test runs with different threadCount. With 11
threadCount, it took 359.293 sec
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9975?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17353231#comment-17353231
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-9975:
---
Hi,
I removed the {{-x signJarsPublication}} from the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9975?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dawid Weiss resolved LUCENE-9975.
-
Fix Version/s: main (9.0)
Resolution: Fixed
> Don't require artifact signing for local
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9975?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17353136#comment-17353136
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-9975:
-
Commit
dweiss merged pull request #156:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/156
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please
dweiss commented on pull request #156:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/156#issuecomment-850298459
bq. I don't know how this works
It's simple but not straightforward. The two entries under "publications"
(jars and unsignedJars) cause gradle to create a bunch of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9204?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17353119#comment-17353119
]
Jim Ferenczi commented on LUCENE-9204:
--
The rewriting of disjunctions that contains duplicate is
zacharymorn commented on pull request #128:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/128#issuecomment-850170387
> the lines come as each check finishes, so you can see what is fast/slow.
It seems postings is slowest, preceded by doc values, and everything else is
super fast.
> Can't
37 matches
Mail list logo
