jimczi commented on a change in pull request #444:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/444#discussion_r749986210
##
File path:
lucene/sandbox/src/java/org/apache/lucene/sandbox/search/MultiNormsLeafSimScorer.java
##
@@ -61,7 +63,14 @@
if (needsScores) {
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10233?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17444070#comment-17444070
]
Feng Guo edited comment on LUCENE-10233 at 11/16/21, 7:43 AM:
--
[~jpountz]
zacharymorn commented on pull request #418:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/418#issuecomment-969846412
> Hi @jpountz @jimczi, when I was doing some more deep dive to see how this
PR can be improved further, I noticed a difference of field-weight parameter
passed to
zacharymorn opened a new pull request #444:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/444
# Description
Updated field-weight used in CombinedFieldQuery scoring calculation
# Tests
1. Added a new test from https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/418
2. Run `./gradlew
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Zach Chen updated LUCENE-10236:
---
Description:
This is a spin-off issue from discussion in
Zach Chen created LUCENE-10236:
--
Summary: CombinedFieldsQuery to use fieldAndWeights.values() when
constructing MultiNormsLeafSimScorer for scoring
Key: LUCENE-10236
URL:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10212?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17444254#comment-17444254
]
Zach Chen commented on LUCENE-10212:
No problem [~julietibs] ! Glad to be able to contribute!
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10062?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17444178#comment-17444178
]
Greg Miller commented on LUCENE-10062:
--
Here's the PR targeting 9.0:
gsmiller commented on a change in pull request #443:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/443#discussion_r749715273
##
File path: lucene/facet/src/java/org/apache/lucene/facet/FacetsConfig.java
##
@@ -409,9 +410,26 @@ private void processFacetFields(
gsmiller commented on pull request #443:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/443#issuecomment-969362319
**NOTE**: I'm working on additional testing but hoping to get some early
feedback on this approach, particularly as backwards-compatibility is
concerned. I'll update with more
gsmiller opened a new pull request #443:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/443
# Description
In benchmarks, using numeric doc values to store taxonomy facet ordinals
shows almost a 400% qps improvement in browse-related taxonomy-based tasks
(instead of custom
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10062?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17444124#comment-17444124
]
Greg Miller commented on LUCENE-10062:
--
I'm posting a new PR now for adding this format change to
bruno-roustant commented on pull request #430:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/430#issuecomment-969337494
Woah, @jpountz your idea has a clear effect. It brings +(10 - 12)% perf,
compared without the top-k optim. And top-k optim adds another +3% on top (plus
it is still very
mkhludnev commented on pull request #2611:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2611#issuecomment-969325618
@jpountz I still not sure if i did it right.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
mkhludnev closed pull request #2610:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2610
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
rmuir commented on a change in pull request #264:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/264#discussion_r749671027
##
File path: lucene/facet/src/java/org/apache/lucene/facet/FacetUtils.java
##
@@ -81,4 +84,19 @@ public long cost() {
}
};
}
+
+ /**
+ *
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10122?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17444098#comment-17444098
]
Haoyu Zhai commented on LUCENE-10122:
-
OK, here's the new PR (with the back-compatibility):
zhaih opened a new pull request #442:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/442
# Description
As mentioned in the issue, use NumericDocValues to store parent array
instead of term positioning.
Benchmark results available in JIRA, in short we're seeing a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10122?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17444091#comment-17444091
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-10122:
-
OK I am convinced too – let's move forward!
bruno-roustant commented on a change in pull request #430:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/430#discussion_r749654605
##
File path: lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/util/IntroSelector.java
##
@@ -185,6 +204,115 @@ private void shuffle(int from, int to) {
}
mkhludnev commented on pull request #2609:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2609#issuecomment-969271708
Uhgg... Thanks, Adrien. I'm on it.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10233?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17444070#comment-17444070
]
Feng Guo edited comment on LUCENE-10233 at 11/15/21, 7:51 PM:
--
[~jpountz]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10233?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17444070#comment-17444070
]
Feng Guo commented on LUCENE-10233:
---
[~jpountz] Thanks! +1 to remove the OffsetBitSet class, but i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9921?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17444029#comment-17444029
]
Arjen commented on LUCENE-9921:
---
Thanks, although this kind of issue can happen with any library. Antlr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9921?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17444025#comment-17444025
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-9921:
-
Sorry you got jar hell because lucene has the outdated
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9921?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17444024#comment-17444024
]
Arjen commented on LUCENE-9921:
---
I know that.
I even fixated it in my build.gradle at 62.2 to prevent
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9921?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17444016#comment-17444016
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-9921:
-
You can't just override the advertised dependency version and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9921?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17444011#comment-17444011
]
Arjen commented on LUCENE-9921:
---
If the window is closing on 9, I agree it would be too risky.
My reason
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17443976#comment-17443976
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-8739:
--
Side thought: it would be nice to use Project Panama's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9921?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17443972#comment-17443972
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-9921:
-
I agree, let's not rush this in close to a release. Note that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10122?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17443965#comment-17443965
]
Greg Miller commented on LUCENE-10122:
--
Yeah, +1 to moving to doc values. Even if we see a minor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17443964#comment-17443964
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-8739:
--
I ran your PR with the new stored fields benchmark to see
Yannick Welsch created LUCENE-10235:
---
Summary: LRUQueryCache should not count never-cacheable queries as
a miss
Key: LUCENE-10235
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10235
Project:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17443953#comment-17443953
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-10216:
-
I like this plan (extending {{MergePolicy}}
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9921?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17443934#comment-17443934
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-9921:
-
I think it's too late for 9.0 - too little testing would be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dawid Weiss resolved LUCENE-10234.
--
Fix Version/s: 9.0
Resolution: Fixed
> Add automatic module name to JAR manifests.
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17443919#comment-17443919
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10234:
--
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dawid Weiss reassigned LUCENE-10234:
Assignee: Dawid Weiss
> Add automatic module name to JAR manifests.
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17443918#comment-17443918
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10234:
--
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17443917#comment-17443917
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10234:
--
Commit
dweiss merged pull request #440:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/440
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
jpountz commented on a change in pull request #430:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/430#discussion_r749462492
##
File path: lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/util/IntroSelector.java
##
@@ -185,6 +204,115 @@ private void shuffle(int from, int to) {
}
}
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17443912#comment-17443912
]
Praveen Nishchal commented on LUCENE-8739:
--
I have created a pull request -
jpountz commented on pull request #2607:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2607#issuecomment-969035659
@noblepaul Note that it should be backported to `branch_8_11` if you want
this change to ever be released.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
jpountz commented on pull request #2609:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2609#issuecomment-969034069
Also it looks like you missed backporting to `branch_8_11`. `branch_8x` is
essentially dead at this point since 8.11 is going the be the last 8.x minor
release.
--
This
jpountz commented on pull request #2609:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2609#issuecomment-969033135
You need to move the CHANGES entry to 8.11.1 since the 8.11 won't have this
change.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10233?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17443902#comment-17443902
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-10233:
---
This is an interesting idea!
One drawback of this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10085?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17443897#comment-17443897
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10085:
--
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10085?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17443895#comment-17443895
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10085:
--
Commit
jpountz merged pull request #441:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/441
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
jpountz commented on pull request #440:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/440#issuecomment-968952307
Please do!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
pquentin opened a new pull request #441:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/441
FieldValueQuery got renamed to DocValuesFieldExistsQuery but the test
wasn't renamed.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub
dweiss commented on pull request #440:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/440#issuecomment-968862647
This is what I'd like to add to branch_9_0 (and branch_9x), @jpountz . Can I?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
Dawid Weiss created LUCENE-10234:
Summary: Add automatic module name to JAR manifests.
Key: LUCENE-10234
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10234
Project: Lucene - Core
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10233?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Feng Guo updated LUCENE-10233:
--
Description:
In low cardinality points cases, id blocks will usually store doc ids that have
the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10233?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Feng Guo updated LUCENE-10233:
--
Description:
In low cardinality points cases, id blocks will usually store doc ids that have
the
mkhludnev merged pull request #2609:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2609
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10233?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Feng Guo updated LUCENE-10233:
--
Description:
In low cardinality points cases, id blocks will usually store doc ids that have
the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10233?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Feng Guo updated LUCENE-10233:
--
Description:
In low cardinality points cases, id blocks will usually store doc ids that have
the
praveennish opened a new pull request #439:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/439
# Description
Lucene currently supports LZ4 and Zlib compression/decompression for
StoredFieldsFormat. We propose Zstandard (https://facebook.github.io/zstd/)
60 matches
Mail list logo
