[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10596?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17543754#comment-17543754
]
tangdh edited comment on LUCENE-10596 at 5/31/22 5:36 AM:
--
I have raised a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10594?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17544105#comment-17544105
]
Lu Xugang commented on LUCENE-10594:
According to the explaining in LUCENE-10188 , this issue is
LuXugang commented on PR #928:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/928#issuecomment-1141622393
According to the explaining in
[LUCENE-10188](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10188) , this issue
is not a problem, closed
--
This is an automated message from the Apache
jtibshirani commented on PR #926:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/926#issuecomment-1141529401
Thanks @alessandrobenedetti for working on this nice simplification! One
thing I wanted to double-check -- for Euclidean distance we're now performing
an extra division compared to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17544079#comment-17544079
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-10598:
--
I think we should validate this count in CheckIndex,
mayya-sharipova commented on PR #926:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/926#issuecomment-1141499461
> The tie-breaking by Lucene docId (smaller id wins) doesn't actually work
right now(for the regular similarities) and not for Euclidean after my changes.
> The node ID and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10594?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lu Xugang resolved LUCENE-10594.
Resolution: Not A Problem
> Duplicated value should be involve in
LuXugang closed pull request #928: LUCENE-10594: Duplicated value should be
involve in SortedSetDocValues#docValueCount() in MemoryIndex
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/928
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17544045#comment-17544045
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-10598:
---
Good catch, it's indeed broken.
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17544043#comment-17544043
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-10188:
---
The value count on SortedSetDocValues should be the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10582?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Julie Tibshirani resolved LUCENE-10582.
---
Fix Version/s: 9.3
Resolution: Fixed
> CombinedFieldQuery fails with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10582?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17544028#comment-17544028
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10582:
--
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10582?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17544026#comment-17544026
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10582:
--
Commit
jtibshirani merged PR #910:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/910
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Adrien Grand created LUCENE-10599:
-
Summary: Improve LogMergePolicy's handling of maxMergeSize
Key: LUCENE-10599
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10599
Project: Lucene - Core
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17543989#comment-17543989
]
Lu Xugang edited comment on LUCENE-10188 at 5/30/22 3:53 PM:
-
Hi,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17543994#comment-17543994
]
Lu Xugang commented on LUCENE-10598:
After LUCENE-10188 's question confirmed by [~jpountz] , I
Lu Xugang created LUCENE-10598:
--
Summary: SortedSetDocValues#docValueCount() should be always
greater than zero
Key: LUCENE-10598
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10598
Project: Lucene
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17543989#comment-17543989
]
Lu Xugang commented on LUCENE-10188:
Hi, [~jpountz] , implementation of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10557?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17543987#comment-17543987
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-10557:
--
I don't think this is a problem. You just create a
alessandrobenedetti commented on code in PR #926:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/926#discussion_r884909389
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/util/hnsw/NeighborQueue.java:
##
@@ -56,9 +56,9 @@ long apply(long v) {
// Whether the search stopped early
alessandrobenedetti commented on code in PR #926:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/926#discussion_r884908511
##
lucene/core/src/test/org/apache/lucene/search/TestKnnVectorQuery.java:
##
@@ -193,25 +208,40 @@ public void testAdvanceShallow() throws IOException {
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10557?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17543968#comment-17543968
]
Tomoko Uchida edited comment on LUCENE-10557 at 5/30/22 2:24 PM:
-
One
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10557?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17543968#comment-17543968
]
Tomoko Uchida commented on LUCENE-10557:
One feature I couldn't find out in GitHub issue that
mocobeta commented on code in PR #931:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/931#discussion_r884855095
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/MaxScoreCache.java:
##
@@ -80,6 +82,9 @@ int getLevel(int upTo) throws IOException {
/** Return the maximum score
mocobeta opened a new pull request, #931:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/931
### Description (or a Jira issue link if you have one)
See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10597
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message,
Tomoko Uchida created LUCENE-10597:
--
Summary: Move globalMaxScore to MaxScoreCache from ImpactsDISI?
Key: LUCENE-10597
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10597
Project: Lucene - Core
alessandrobenedetti commented on PR #926:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/926#issuecomment-1141164970
@mayya-sharipova , @msokolov I found out the reason the original tests are
now failing.
The tie-breaking by Lucene docId (smaller id wins) doesn't actually work
right
shaie commented on PR #841:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/841#issuecomment-1141152098
Hey @mdmarshmallow I think this is a great and very useful feature. I also
believe that in general it will be good to accompany these changes with a demo
`main()` in the `demo` package, but
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10557?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17543911#comment-17543911
]
Tomoko Uchida edited comment on LUCENE-10557 at 5/30/22 11:52 AM:
--
Hi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10557?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17543911#comment-17543911
]
Tomoko Uchida commented on LUCENE-10557:
Hi [~janhoy], thanks for your suggestion.
"Migrate no
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10151?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17543885#comment-17543885
]
Deepika Sharma edited comment on LUCENE-10151 at 5/30/22 11:08 AM:
---
I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10151?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17543885#comment-17543885
]
Deepika Sharma commented on LUCENE-10151:
-
I have raised a PR for the `BulkScorer` approach.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10574?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17543852#comment-17543852
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10574:
--
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10574?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17543851#comment-17543851
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10574:
--
Commit
janhoy merged PR #2661:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2661
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10557?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17543849#comment-17543849
]
Jan Høydahl commented on LUCENE-10557:
--
Thanks for thorough research! I propose to skip bulk
uschindler commented on PR #912:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/912#issuecomment-1140807127
Thanks @mocobeta,
I just need to not forget to reenable in September when this gets merged
(the we van also use Autoprovision of JDK 19).
--
This is an automated message from the
uschindler commented on PR #912:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/912#issuecomment-1140776739
Thanks. Here we only need to compile a specific exact version (19). So for
the MR-JAR task this should be fine with auto-discovery.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
vigyasharma commented on PR #633:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/633#issuecomment-1140767642
> I could either wrap the runningMerges update with a synchronized
(IndexWriter.this) {}, or make runningMerges a synchronizedSet. I like the
second approach as it automatically fixes
40 matches
Mail list logo
