[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17077719#comment-17077719
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-14385:
-
Seems like? I just tried running SplitByPrefixTest on master,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14391?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17076469#comment-17076469
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-14391:
-
bq. Why?
Given that this dates back to Lucene 3.2 or so, it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley updated SOLR-14275:
Labels: scaling (was: )
> Policy calculations are very slow for large clusters and large
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13951?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley updated SOLR-13951:
Issue Type: Improvement (was: Bug)
Labels: scaling (was: )
> Avoid replica state
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13951?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley updated SOLR-13951:
Component/s: SolrCloud
> Avoid replica state updates to state.json
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17055476#comment-17055476
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-14007:
-
.bq Even if JSON percentile doesn't use NamedList, response
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17053842#comment-17053842
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-11725:
-
+1 to commit
> json.facet's stddev() function should be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17048007#comment-17048007
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-14278:
-
I'm going to keep this issue open since I looped this test for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13813?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley updated SOLR-13813:
Attachment: SOLR-13813.patch
Status: Open (was: Open)
Attaching updated patch with fixed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17045774#comment-17045774
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-14278:
-
Unfortunately (or fortunately, depending on how you look at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17043780#comment-17043780
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-14278:
-
Testing update: I let the test loop overnight with split shard
Yonik Seeley created SOLR-14278:
---
Summary: data loss during live shard split if leader dies
Key: SOLR-14278
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14278
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13813?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley updated SOLR-13813:
Attachment: SOLR-13813.patch
Status: Open (was: Open)
> Shared storage online split
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13813?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17040279#comment-17040279
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-13813:
-
Attaching test in progress for live shard splitting with a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14058?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley resolved SOLR-14058.
-
Fix Version/s: 8.5
Resolution: Fixed
> IOOBE in PeerSync
> -
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14058?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley updated SOLR-14058:
Affects Version/s: 6.2
> IOOBE in PeerSync
> -
>
> Key: SOLR-14058
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14058?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17034722#comment-17034722
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-14058:
-
After some manual git bisecting, I think this bug entered the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17031026#comment-17031026
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-11725:
-
bq. No changes have been done with regards to sample size of 1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14058?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley updated SOLR-14058:
Summary: IOOBE in PeerSync (was: AIOOBE in PeerSync)
> IOOBE in PeerSync
> -
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14058?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley updated SOLR-14058:
Attachment: SOLR-14058.patch
Affects Version/s: master (9.0)
Assignee:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14134?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley resolved SOLR-14134.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> Clear shared core's concurrency cache
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13932?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley resolved SOLR-13932.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> Review directory locking and Blob interactions
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13101?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17001982#comment-17001982
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-13101:
-
bq. Is there any reason why wee can't release this as a third
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14098?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16997464#comment-16997464
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-14098:
-
Tracing it back, it looks like this bug has been around since
Yonik Seeley created SOLR-14098:
---
Summary: inconsistent replica state treatment in
RequestApplyUpdatesOp
Key: SOLR-14098
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14098
Project: Solr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13884?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16996436#comment-16996436
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-13884:
-
Gah... apologies, these commits were just lying around in my
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14079?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley resolved SOLR-14079.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> SPLITSHARD splitByPrefix doesn't work in async mode
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14079?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16995589#comment-16995589
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-14079:
-
bq. The patch is using different but constant async id's for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14079?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16995262#comment-16995262
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-14079:
-
Fix attached, targeted for 8.4. Thanks to my colleagues who
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14079?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley updated SOLR-14079:
Attachment: SOLR-14079.patch
Status: Open (was: Open)
> SPLITSHARD splitByPrefix doesn't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14079?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley updated SOLR-14079:
Assignee: Yonik Seeley
Status: Open (was: Open)
> SPLITSHARD splitByPrefix doesn't work in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14079?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley updated SOLR-14079:
Fix Version/s: 8.4
Affects Version/s: 8.3
> SPLITSHARD splitByPrefix doesn't work in async
Yonik Seeley created SOLR-14079:
---
Summary: SPLITSHARD splitByPrefix doesn't work in async mode
Key: SOLR-14079
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14079
Project: Solr
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14058?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16993852#comment-16993852
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-14058:
-
Here's our stacktrace:
{code}
2019-12-11 19:16:35.028 ERROR
Yonik Seeley created SOLR-14058:
---
Summary: AIOOBE in PeerSync
Key: SOLR-14058
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14058
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13978?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16993201#comment-16993201
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-13978:
-
bq. I can fix this, if we agree to remove /query.
/query has
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14039?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16991941#comment-16991941
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-14039:
-
If it's truly that commit, then it has to be the jetty.xml
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14013?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16991041#comment-16991041
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-14013:
-
Please don't commit that huge JSON file... a doc matching that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14013?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley updated SOLR-14013:
Attachment: TestQuerySpeed.java
Status: Open (was: Open)
Here's the "benchmark" program I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14013?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley updated SOLR-14013:
Status: Open (was: Open)
> javabin performance regressions
> ---
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14013?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16991014#comment-16991014
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-14013:
-
I worked up a quick-n-dirty patch to disable the charseq
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14013?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16990926#comment-16990926
]
Yonik Seeley edited comment on SOLR-14013 at 12/8/19 5:26 PM:
--
Those
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14013?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16990926#comment-16990926
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-14013:
-
Those benchmarks look like they are testing different
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14013?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16990579#comment-16990579
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-14013:
-
Even without the O(N^2) bug, which would be that hard to work
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14013?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16990572#comment-16990572
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-14013:
-
OK, found the primary issue it's an N^2 bug.
h3.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13990?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16990209#comment-16990209
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-13990:
-
We would also need to understand what behavior we actually
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12983?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16989972#comment-16989972
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-12983:
-
Folks, in the future we really need more description about
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14013?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16989860#comment-16989860
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-14013:
-
Just an update... I tried speeding things up by skipping most
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14013?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16989121#comment-16989121
]
Yonik Seeley edited comment on SOLR-14013 at 12/5/19 8:07 PM:
--
I did some
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14013?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16989121#comment-16989121
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-14013:
-
I did some digging... the current code is certainly more
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13963?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16987980#comment-16987980
]
Yonik Seeley edited comment on SOLR-13963 at 12/4/19 7:19 PM:
--
Thank you for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13990?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16988000#comment-16988000
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-13990:
-
Hopefully the issues pointed at have been resolved? FWIW, the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14013?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley reassigned SOLR-14013:
---
Assignee: Yonik Seeley
> javabin performance regressions
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14013?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16987986#comment-16987986
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-14013:
-
The original reporter suspects that this may be caused by
Yonik Seeley created SOLR-14013:
---
Summary: javabin performance regressions
Key: SOLR-14013
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14013
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Bug
Security
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13963?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16987980#comment-16987980
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-13963:
-
Thank you for bringing this to our attention [~rrockenbaugh],
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13963?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley updated SOLR-13963:
Affects Version/s: (was: 8.3)
8.1
> JavaBinCodec has concurrent
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13963?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16982440#comment-16982440
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-13963:
-
Folks, when we know what releases are affected (esp for a bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13955?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley resolved SOLR-13955.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks Bilal!
Context for others: I committed this one quickly to the feature
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13813?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16980307#comment-16980307
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-13813:
-
If I ignore indexing failures during the split, then the test
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13945?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16978520#comment-16978520
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-13945:
-
It would be great if we could capture what is currently
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13932?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16977571#comment-16977571
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-13932:
-
Yep, sounds right.
> Review directory locking for Blob
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9027?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16973707#comment-16973707
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-9027:
--
Yep, going little-endian is the right choice. big-endian
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13898?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16972688#comment-16972688
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-13898:
-
Using computeIfAbsent makes total sense for something like
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13813?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16971240#comment-16971240
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-13813:
-
OK, so I re-added the live split test, updated to reflect the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13884?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16966805#comment-16966805
]
Yonik Seeley edited comment on SOLR-13884 at 11/4/19 4:56 PM:
--
OK, I updated
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13884?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley updated SOLR-13884:
Description:
When multiple collection creations are done concurrently with a
collection-level
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13891?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley updated SOLR-13891:
Environment: (was: By default, our current replica placement is
effectively random instead of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13891?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley updated SOLR-13891:
Description:
By default, our current replica placement is effectively random instead of
spreading
Yonik Seeley created SOLR-13891:
---
Summary: Default replica placement is random
Key: SOLR-13891
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13891
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13884?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16966805#comment-16966805
]
Yonik Seeley edited comment on SOLR-13884 at 11/4/19 4:34 PM:
--
OK, I updated
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13884?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16966805#comment-16966805
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-13884:
-
OK, I updated the test to reproduce another serious bug with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13884?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16964155#comment-16964155
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-13884:
-
Just an update on this... when I use an explicit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13101?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16963450#comment-16963450
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-13101:
-
The branch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13884?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16963368#comment-16963368
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-13884:
-
This may not be a concurrency issue
I just tried
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13884?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16963353#comment-16963353
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-13884:
-
See #987 for a test. When I run 20 concurrent single replica
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13884?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley updated SOLR-13884:
Comment: was deleted
(was: As [~dsmiley] noted, it seems like this issue should have been fixed by
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13884?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16963346#comment-16963346
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-13884:
-
As [~dsmiley] noted, it seems like this issue should have been
Yonik Seeley created SOLR-13884:
---
Summary: Concurrent collection creation leads to unbalanced cluster
Key: SOLR-13884
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13884
Project: Solr
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13815?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley resolved SOLR-13815.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> Live split can lose data
>
>
> Key:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13815?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley reassigned SOLR-13815:
---
Assignee: Yonik Seeley
> Live split can lose data
>
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13815?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16950132#comment-16950132
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-13815:
-
bq. the shard state is coming from the clusterstate which is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13815?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley updated SOLR-13815:
Fix Version/s: 8.3
> Live split can lose data
>
>
> Key:
Yonik Seeley created SOLR-13833:
---
Summary: setupRequest normally called twice
Key: SOLR-13833
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13833
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Bug
Security
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13815?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16947933#comment-16947933
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-13815:
-
OK, I've verified what the race is (or rather what this test
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13815?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16947902#comment-16947902
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-13815:
-
Actually, doc_38 and doc_40 don't look the same.
When
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13815?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16946917#comment-16946917
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-13815:
-
I dug into
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13815?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley updated SOLR-13815:
Attachment: fail.191004_053129
> Live split can lose data
>
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13815?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16944569#comment-16944569
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-13815:
-
OK, I updated the PR with code to show what document is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13815?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley updated SOLR-13815:
Attachment: fail.191004_093307
> Live split can lose data
>
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13815?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16943695#comment-16943695
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-13815:
-
OK, I've confirmed that this test sometimes fails on master
Yonik Seeley created SOLR-13815:
---
Summary: Live split can lose data
Key: SOLR-13815
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13815
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13813?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16943070#comment-16943070
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-13813:
-
The other notable thing is that I *thought* the test was solid
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13813?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16943057#comment-16943057
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-13813:
-
This PR ( https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/918 )
Yonik Seeley created SOLR-13813:
---
Summary: Shared storage online split support
Key: SOLR-13813
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13813
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Sub-task
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13101?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16942890#comment-16942890
]
Yonik Seeley edited comment on SOLR-13101 at 10/2/19 3:10 PM:
--
bq. How far
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13101?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16942890#comment-16942890
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-13101:
-
bq. How far do you think is it complete? Do you forsee a lot
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13101?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16939809#comment-16939809
]
Yonik Seeley edited comment on SOLR-13101 at 9/30/19 5:21 PM:
--
I plan on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13101?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16939809#comment-16939809
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-13101:
-
I plan on creating a branch jira/SOLR-13101 soon for future
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley resolved SOLR-13399.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> compositeId support for shard splitting
>
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
