[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-10168) drop support for 7.0 indexes in 9.0 (master)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10168?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17448408#comment-17448408 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10168: -- Commit

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-10168) drop support for 7.0 indexes in 9.0 (master)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10168?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17447839#comment-17447839 ] Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-10168: --- I attached a PR. > drop support for 7.0 indexes in 9.0

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-10168) drop support for 7.0 indexes in 9.0 (master)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10168?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17447124#comment-17447124 ] Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-10168: --- So what about the following: - Tests for file formats

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-10168) drop support for 7.0 indexes in 9.0 (master)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10168?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17447025#comment-17447025 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-10168: -- Something to keep in mind, with whatever we do, is that I

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-10168) drop support for 7.0 indexes in 9.0 (master)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10168?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17427703#comment-17427703 ] Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-10168: -- I'd move them to nightly runs. Or mark them Slow.  > drop

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-10168) drop support for 7.0 indexes in 9.0 (master)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10168?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17427701#comment-17427701 ] Michael Sokolov commented on LUCENE-10168: -- This is what I see:   {{> Task

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-10168) drop support for 7.0 indexes in 9.0 (master)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10168?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17427691#comment-17427691 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-10168: -- And instead of hiding the problem under the rug, we could

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-10168) drop support for 7.0 indexes in 9.0 (master)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10168?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17427692#comment-17427692 ] Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-10168: -- We do now:

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-10168) drop support for 7.0 indexes in 9.0 (master)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10168?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17427690#comment-17427690 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-10168: -- The reason they only take 6 minutes on your computer is

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-10168) drop support for 7.0 indexes in 9.0 (master)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10168?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17427666#comment-17427666 ] Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-10168: -- IntelliJ doesn't use parallel VMs (or rather: it depends

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-10168) drop support for 7.0 indexes in 9.0 (master)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10168?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17427664#comment-17427664 ] Michael Sokolov commented on LUCENE-10168: -- I haven't messed around with these tests, so I was

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-10168) drop support for 7.0 indexes in 9.0 (master)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10168?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17427656#comment-17427656 ] Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-10168: -- I think this makes sense. Backward-compatibility is

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-10168) drop support for 7.0 indexes in 9.0 (master)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10168?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17427651#comment-17427651 ] Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-10168: --- Maybe all tests in this module should be annotated with