[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17579575#comment-17579575
]
Marios Trivyzas commented on LUCENE-10662:
--
Is this something we still consider to go ahead
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17579570#comment-17579570
]
Marios Trivyzas commented on LUCENE-10423:
--
But `nanoTime()` is marked here:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17579703#comment-17579703
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-10662:
--
Hi [~matriv] . I don't think we'll integrate this change.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17579678#comment-17579678
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-10423:
--
The comment is slightly incorrect. nanoTime should still
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10674?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17579854#comment-17579854
]
Jack Mazanec commented on LUCENE-10674:
---
{color:#1d1c1d}Anyone have any thoughts? If not I will
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17579789#comment-17579789
]
Marios Trivyzas commented on LUCENE-10423:
--
Thanks for explaining further, could you assign
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17579831#comment-17579831
]
Julie Tibshirani commented on LUCENE-10471:
---
bq. It makes sense to me to increase the limit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17579875#comment-17579875
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-10471:
--
It is also terrible that this issue says 2048 but somehow
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10577?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17579958#comment-17579958
]
Julie Tibshirani commented on LUCENE-10577:
---
I also noticed a recurring test failure after
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10577?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17579957#comment-17579957
]
Julie Tibshirani commented on LUCENE-10577:
---
Sorry to be so slow at reviewing @msokolov, this
elliotzlin opened a new pull request, #1069:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/1069
### Description (or a Jira issue link if you have one)
[LUCENE-2587](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2587)
The issue has a good write up of the bug.
To summarize, we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir reassigned LUCENE-10423:
Assignee: Marios Trivyzas
> Remove uses of wall-clock time in codebase
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17579874#comment-17579874
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-10471:
--
My main concern is that it can't be undone, as i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2587?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17579967#comment-17579967
]
Elliot Z. Lin commented on LUCENE-2587:
---
Jumping in here to revive this decade-old issue. Roberto,
jmazanec15 opened a new pull request, #1068:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/1068
### Description (or a Jira issue link if you have one)
Update all subiterators of BitSetConjunctionDISI to NO_MORE_DOCS when lead
iterator's current doc is greater than the length of the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10577?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17579957#comment-17579957
]
Julie Tibshirani edited comment on LUCENE-10577 at 8/15/22 11:14 PM:
16 matches
Mail list logo