mikemccand commented on PR #12287:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12287#issuecomment-1908191816
> Maybe we can merge this fix as-is and continue the conversation about
where test polygon generation should produce valid polygons in #12596. I
+1. Progress not perfection!
ChrisHegarty commented on PR #13014:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13014#issuecomment-1908264542
@gf2121 I've added the 9.9.2 milestone to this PR. Do you agree? If so, is
it possible to merge and backport to the `branch_9x` and `branch_9_9` branches.
--
This is an
rquesada-tibco opened a new issue, #13029:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13029
### Description
We recently discovered a performance degradation on our project when going
from Lucene 9.4 to 9.9. The cause seems to be a side effect of
kaivalnp commented on PR #12679:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12679#issuecomment-1907958716
This feature will ship with Lucene 9.10
I'm not sure when that will be released, though [I
see](https://lucene.apache.org/core/corenews.html) \~2-4 months between
previous minor
stefanvodita commented on code in PR #13028:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13028#discussion_r1464835176
##
lucene/facet/src/java/org/apache/lucene/facet/taxonomy/directory/TaxonomyIndexArrays.java:
##
@@ -95,7 +97,8 @@ public TaxonomyIndexArrays(IndexReader reader,
easyice opened a new pull request, #13030:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13030
Gradle command to reproduce:
```
./gradlew :lucene:core:test --tests
"org.apache.lucene.search.TestTopFieldCollector.testTotalHits"
-Ptests.heapsize=2g -Ptests.jvms=6
mrkm4ntr opened a new pull request, #13031:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13031
### Description
The topLevelScoringClause is not propagated with QueryProfiler. This causes
some optimizations are skipped during profiling.
--
This is an automated message from the
cpoerschke opened a new pull request, #13032:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13032
Noticed whilst code reading. No issue or CHANGES.txt entry needed I think.
For `main` and `branch_9x` branches only.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
stefanvodita merged PR #12287:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12287
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
stefanvodita commented on PR #12287:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12287#issuecomment-1908668560
Thank you for persevering @heemin32!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
cpoerschke closed pull request #13019: join: avoid repeat BytesRefHash.sort()
in TermsQuery after TermsIncludingScoreQuery
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13019
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use
cpoerschke commented on PR #13019:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13019#issuecomment-1908384002
closing in favour of #13014
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
heemin32 commented on PR #12287:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12287#issuecomment-1908615744
Added CHANGELOG entry
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
benwtrent commented on issue #12505:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/12505#issuecomment-1908426746
As pointed out in other issue conversations, Cassandra keeps track of the
visited ratio over the lifetime of the index and its searches:
stefanvodita commented on PR #12287:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12287#issuecomment-1907818280
Maybe we can merge this fix as-is and continue the conversation about where
test polygon generation should produce valid polygons in #12596. It's not clear
to me now if there is
shubhamvishu commented on PR #13001:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13001#issuecomment-1907646476
@uschindler @mikemccand I think we could merge this now unless I'm missing
something?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message,
gf2121 merged PR #13014:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13014
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #13008:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13008#issuecomment-1909133869
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If
the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you
for your
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #12984:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12984#issuecomment-1909133928
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If
the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you
for your
stefanvodita merged PR #13028:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13028
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
20 matches
Mail list logo
