[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-10627) Using CompositeByteBuf to Reduce Memory Copy

2022-07-07 Thread LuYunCheng (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10627?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17564086#comment-17564086 ] LuYunCheng commented on LUCENE-10627: - [~rcmuir]  Hi, At latest commit i *reuse

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-10627) Using CompositeByteBuf to Reduce Memory Copy

2022-07-07 Thread LuYunCheng (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10627?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] LuYunCheng updated LUCENE-10627: Description: Code: [https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/987] I see When Lucene Do flush and

[jira] [Comment Edited] (LUCENE-10627) Using CompositeByteBuf to Reduce Memory Copy

2022-07-07 Thread LuYunCheng (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10627?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17563044#comment-17563044 ] LuYunCheng edited comment on LUCENE-10627 at 7/8/22 5:33 AM: - [~jpountz]

[jira] [Resolved] (LUCENE-10600) SortedSetDocValues#docValueCount should be an int, not long

2022-07-07 Thread Lu Xugang (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10600?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lu Xugang resolved LUCENE-10600. Resolution: Fixed > SortedSetDocValues#docValueCount should be an int, not long >

[GitHub] [lucene-jira-archive] mocobeta closed issue #8: Set assignee field for issues if the account mapping is given

2022-07-07 Thread GitBox
mocobeta closed issue #8: Set assignee field for issues if the account mapping is given URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-jira-archive/issues/8 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to

[GitHub] [lucene] gsmiller commented on pull request #1010: Specialize ordinal encoding for SortedSetDocValues

2022-07-07 Thread GitBox
gsmiller commented on PR #1010: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/1010#issuecomment-1178381324 Benchmarks look good on SSDV faceting (and no regressions elsewhere). I think some new bench tasks have recently been added as well that might be relevant here, so I'll update my

[GitHub] [lucene] gsmiller opened a new pull request, #1010: Specialize ordinal encoding for SortedSetDocValues

2022-07-07 Thread GitBox
gsmiller opened a new pull request, #1010: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/1010 ### Description (or a Jira issue link if you have one) This follows up the work done in LUCENE-10067 by adding additional specialization for SORTED_SET doc values. -- This is an automated

[GitHub] [lucene-jira-archive] dweiss commented on issue #8: Set assignee field for issues if the account mapping is given

2022-07-07 Thread GitBox
dweiss commented on issue #8: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-jira-archive/issues/8#issuecomment-1178379951 Excellent! -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific

[GitHub] [lucene] Yuti-G commented on a diff in pull request #974: LUCENE-10614: Properly support getTopChildren in RangeFacetCounts

2022-07-07 Thread GitBox
Yuti-G commented on code in PR #974: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/974#discussion_r916342857 ## lucene/demo/src/java/org/apache/lucene/demo/facet/RangeFacetsExample.java: ## @@ -73,6 +76,35 @@ public void index() throws IOException {

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-10563) Unable to Tessellate polygon

2022-07-07 Thread ASF subversion and git services (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10563?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17563996#comment-17563996 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10563: -- Commit

[GitHub] [lucene] dnhatn merged pull request #1009: LUCENE-10563: Fix CHANGES list

2022-07-07 Thread GitBox
dnhatn merged PR #1009: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/1009 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail:

[GitHub] [lucene] dnhatn commented on pull request #1009: LUCENE-10563: Fix CHANGES list

2022-07-07 Thread GitBox
dnhatn commented on PR #1009: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/1009#issuecomment-1178274830 @gsmiller Thanks for review. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific

[GitHub] [lucene] dnhatn opened a new pull request, #1009: LUCENE-10563: Fix CHANGES list

2022-07-07 Thread GitBox
dnhatn opened a new pull request, #1009: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/1009 The CHANGES of 10.0 were accidentally merged into 9x CHANGES in https://github.com/apache/lucene/commit/b7231bb54884f9ce0232430c4a60cdb5753c6b82. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git

[GitHub] [lucene] gsmiller commented on a diff in pull request #974: LUCENE-10614: Properly support getTopChildren in RangeFacetCounts

2022-07-07 Thread GitBox
gsmiller commented on code in PR #974: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/974#discussion_r916216255 ## lucene/demo/src/java/org/apache/lucene/demo/facet/RangeFacetsExample.java: ## @@ -73,6 +76,35 @@ public void index() throws IOException {

[jira] [Closed] (LUCENE-10194) Should IndexWriter buffer KNN vectors on disk?

2022-07-07 Thread Mayya Sharipova (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mayya Sharipova closed LUCENE-10194. > Should IndexWriter buffer KNN vectors on disk? >

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-10194) Should IndexWriter buffer KNN vectors on disk?

2022-07-07 Thread Mayya Sharipova (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17563924#comment-17563924 ] Mayya Sharipova commented on LUCENE-10194: -- + 1 for closing. I've closed the corresponding PR

[jira] [Resolved] (LUCENE-10194) Should IndexWriter buffer KNN vectors on disk?

2022-07-07 Thread Mayya Sharipova (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mayya Sharipova resolved LUCENE-10194. -- Resolution: Won't Fix > Should IndexWriter buffer KNN vectors on disk? >

[GitHub] [lucene] mayya-sharipova commented on pull request #728: LUCENE-10194 Buffer KNN vectors on disk

2022-07-07 Thread GitBox
mayya-sharipova commented on PR #728: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/728#issuecomment-1178089438 Closing this PR in favour of [alternative](https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/992) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message,

[GitHub] [lucene] mayya-sharipova closed pull request #728: LUCENE-10194 Buffer KNN vectors on disk

2022-07-07 Thread GitBox
mayya-sharipova closed pull request #728: LUCENE-10194 Buffer KNN vectors on disk URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/728 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific

[jira] [Comment Edited] (LUCENE-10194) Should IndexWriter buffer KNN vectors on disk?

2022-07-07 Thread Julie Tibshirani (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17563919#comment-17563919 ] Julie Tibshirani edited comment on LUCENE-10194 at 7/7/22 6:48 PM: ---

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-10194) Should IndexWriter buffer KNN vectors on disk?

2022-07-07 Thread Julie Tibshirani (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17563919#comment-17563919 ] Julie Tibshirani commented on LUCENE-10194: --- [~mayya] [~jpountz] can we close this since

[GitHub] [lucene] mayya-sharipova commented on pull request #992: LUCENE-10592 Build HNSW Graph on indexing

2022-07-07 Thread GitBox
mayya-sharipova commented on PR #992: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/992#issuecomment-1178060346 @jtibshirani Thanks for another set of comments, I will work on addressing them. Meanwhile, I have run another set of benchmarks on a different dataset

[GitHub] [lucene] jtibshirani commented on a diff in pull request #992: LUCENE-10592 Build HNSW Graph on indexing

2022-07-07 Thread GitBox
jtibshirani commented on code in PR #992: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/992#discussion_r916054211 ## lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/codecs/perfield/PerFieldKnnVectorsFormat.java: ## @@ -102,9 +104,22 @@ private class FieldsWriter extends KnnVectorsWriter {

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-10603) Improve iteration of ords for SortedSetDocValues

2022-07-07 Thread Greg Miller (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10603?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17563912#comment-17563912 ] Greg Miller commented on LUCENE-10603: -- It looks like the only remaining work is to: # Remove the

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-10603) Improve iteration of ords for SortedSetDocValues

2022-07-07 Thread ASF subversion and git services (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10603?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17563901#comment-17563901 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10603: -- Commit

[GitHub] [lucene] gsmiller merged pull request #1004: LUCENE-10603: Stop using SortedSetDocValues.NO_MORE_ORDS in tests

2022-07-07 Thread GitBox
gsmiller merged PR #1004: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/1004 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail:

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-10603) Improve iteration of ords for SortedSetDocValues

2022-07-07 Thread ASF subversion and git services (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10603?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17563876#comment-17563876 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10603: -- Commit

[GitHub] [lucene] gsmiller commented on pull request #1004: LUCENE-10603: Stop using SortedSetDocValues.NO_MORE_ORDS in tests

2022-07-07 Thread GitBox
gsmiller commented on PR #1004: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/1004#issuecomment-1177927537 Looks good. Thanks @stefanvodita! -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-10643) Lucene Jenkins CI - s390x support

2022-07-07 Thread Uwe Schindler (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10643?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17563840#comment-17563840 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-10643: bq. The timeout is caused by a hard limit in jenkins

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-10643) Lucene Jenkins CI - s390x support

2022-07-07 Thread Uwe Schindler (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10643?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17563836#comment-17563836 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-10643: Hi [~Nayana], the Java 19 (JDK project Panama) run to

[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-10646) Add some comment on LevenshteinAutomata

2022-07-07 Thread tangdh (Jira)
tangdh created LUCENE-10646: --- Summary: Add some comment on LevenshteinAutomata Key: LUCENE-10646 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10646 Project: Lucene - Core Issue Type:

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-10619) Optimize the writeBytes in TermsHashPerField

2022-07-07 Thread tangdh (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10619?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17563829#comment-17563829 ] tangdh commented on LUCENE-10619: - [~jpountz] ,can this pr be merged? > Optimize the writeBytes in

[GitHub] [lucene-jira-archive] mocobeta merged pull request #18: Check if the assignee account can be assigned on the repo

2022-07-07 Thread GitBox
mocobeta merged PR #18: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-jira-archive/pull/18 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail:

[GitHub] [lucene-jira-archive] mikemccand commented on issue #8: Set assignee field for issues if the account mapping is given

2022-07-07 Thread GitBox
mikemccand commented on issue #8: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-jira-archive/issues/8#issuecomment-1177759497 Woot! -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment.

[GitHub] [lucene-jira-archive] mocobeta commented on issue #8: Set assignee field for issues if the account mapping is given

2022-07-07 Thread GitBox
mocobeta commented on issue #8: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-jira-archive/issues/8#issuecomment-1177747831 Thank you both, confirmed that the assignee can be ported. Issue search result ![Screenshot from 2022-07-07

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-10627) Using CompositeByteBuf to Reduce Memory Copy

2022-07-07 Thread Robert Muir (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10627?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17563805#comment-17563805 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-10627: -- Yes we have to stop another PagedBytes/ByteBlockPool from

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-10643) Lucene Jenkins CI - s390x support

2022-07-07 Thread Dawid Weiss (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10643?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17563795#comment-17563795 ] Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-10643: -- The timeout is caused by a hard limit in jenkins that

[GitHub] [lucene-jira-archive] dweiss commented on issue #8: Set assignee field for issues if the account mapping is given

2022-07-07 Thread GitBox
dweiss commented on issue #8: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-jira-archive/issues/8#issuecomment-1177587814 Accepted the invitation just now. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-10643) Lucene Jenkins CI - s390x support

2022-07-07 Thread Uwe Schindler (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10643?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17563763#comment-17563763 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-10643: It is configured to be {{@daily}}. Normal lucene

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-10643) Lucene Jenkins CI - s390x support

2022-07-07 Thread Nayana Thorat (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10643?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17563743#comment-17563743 ] Nayana Thorat commented on LUCENE-10643: One more thing want to ask: How frequently these jobs

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-10643) Lucene Jenkins CI - s390x support

2022-07-07 Thread Uwe Schindler (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10643?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17563742#comment-17563742 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-10643: See this:

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-10643) Lucene Jenkins CI - s390x support

2022-07-07 Thread Nayana Thorat (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10643?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17563737#comment-17563737 ] Nayana Thorat commented on LUCENE-10643: [~uschindler] Oh ok. Thank you for clarification >

[jira] [Comment Edited] (LUCENE-10643) Lucene Jenkins CI - s390x support

2022-07-07 Thread Uwe Schindler (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10643?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17563729#comment-17563729 ] Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-10643 at 7/7/22 11:41 AM: -

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-10643) Lucene Jenkins CI - s390x support

2022-07-07 Thread Uwe Schindler (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10643?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17563729#comment-17563729 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-10643: [~Nayana]: This is not a problem. It appears on all

[jira] [Comment Edited] (LUCENE-10643) Lucene Jenkins CI - s390x support

2022-07-07 Thread Nayana Thorat (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10643?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17563727#comment-17563727 ] Nayana Thorat edited comment on LUCENE-10643 at 7/7/22 11:39 AM: -

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-10643) Lucene Jenkins CI - s390x support

2022-07-07 Thread Nayana Thorat (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10643?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17563727#comment-17563727 ] Nayana Thorat commented on LUCENE-10643: [~uschindler]

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-10643) Lucene Jenkins CI - s390x support

2022-07-07 Thread Uwe Schindler (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10643?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17563719#comment-17563719 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-10643: Great thanks, will setup a job for that. It look like

[GitHub] [lucene-jira-archive] mikemccand commented on issue #8: Set assignee field for issues if the account mapping is given

2022-07-07 Thread GitBox
mikemccand commented on issue #8: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-jira-archive/issues/8#issuecomment-1177455363 > @mikemccand I invited you to a test repository to test if we can set (migrate) issues' `Assignee` field. An email should have been sent - can you please accept it? >

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-10643) Lucene Jenkins CI - s390x support

2022-07-07 Thread Nayana Thorat (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10643?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17563713#comment-17563713 ] Nayana Thorat commented on LUCENE-10643: [~uschindler] Yes.. oracle does not offer JDK 19 for

[GitHub] [lucene-jira-archive] mocobeta commented on issue #8: Set assignee field for issues if the account mapping is given

2022-07-07 Thread GitBox
mocobeta commented on issue #8: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-jira-archive/issues/8#issuecomment-1177419371 Thank you @dweiss for noticing this. I invited you to a test repository. I think an email has been sent. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To

[GitHub] [lucene] zacharymorn merged pull request #1006: LUCENE-10480: Move scoring from advance to TwoPhaseIterator#matches to improve disjunction within conjunction

2022-07-07 Thread GitBox
zacharymorn merged PR #1006: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/1006 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail:

[GitHub] [lucene] zacharymorn opened a new pull request, #1008: LUCENE-10480: (Backporting) Move scoring from advance to TwoPhaseIterator#matches to improve disjunction within conjunction (#1006)

2022-07-07 Thread GitBox
zacharymorn opened a new pull request, #1008: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/1008 This PR backports https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/1006 into `branch_9x` -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and

[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-10645) Wrong autocomplete suggestion

2022-07-07 Thread Emiliyan Sinigerov (Jira)
Emiliyan Sinigerov created LUCENE-10645: --- Summary: Wrong autocomplete suggestion Key: LUCENE-10645 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10645 Project: Lucene - Core Issue

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-10480) Specialize 2-clauses disjunctions

2022-07-07 Thread ASF subversion and git services (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17563627#comment-17563627 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10480: -- Commit

[GitHub] [lucene] zacharymorn commented on pull request #1006: LUCENE-10480: Move scoring from advance to TwoPhaseIterator#matches to improve disjunction within conjunction

2022-07-07 Thread GitBox
zacharymorn commented on PR #1006: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/1006#issuecomment-1177230791 > Ah, that makes sense to me now! Thanks for explaining. No problem! -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to

[GitHub] [lucene] jpountz commented on pull request #1006: LUCENE-10480: Move scoring from advance to TwoPhaseIterator#matches to improve disjunction within conjunction

2022-07-07 Thread GitBox
jpountz commented on PR #1006: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/1006#issuecomment-1177173038 Ah, that makes sense to me now! Thanks for explaining. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL