[jira] [Commented] (MDEP-204) go-offline fails to resolve artifact available in maven reactor

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MDEP-204?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16921029#comment-16921029 ] Maarten Mulders commented on MDEP-204: -- I've made an attempt to rewrite this goal. It passes existing

[GitHub] [maven-dependency-plugin] mthmulders opened a new pull request #20: [MDEP-204] Rewrite go-offline goal w/ integration test

mthmulders opened a new pull request #20: [MDEP-204] Rewrite go-offline goal w/ integration test URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-dependency-plugin/pull/20 Following this checklist to help us incorporate your contribution quickly and easily: - [X] Make sure there is a [JIRA

[jira] [Commented] (MSOURCES-120) Reproducible Builds: make entries in output jar files reproducible (order + timestamp)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MSOURCES-120?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16921017#comment-16921017 ] Plamen Totev commented on MSOURCES-120: --- I think I found the root cause. In order to set the Zip

[GitHub] [maven-surefire] dejan2609 commented on issue #233: [SUREFIRE-1494] default provider for JUnit4 integration tests is changed (from 'surefire-junit4' to 'surefire-junit47')

dejan2609 commented on issue #233: [SUREFIRE-1494] default provider for JUnit4 integration tests is changed (from 'surefire-junit4' to 'surefire-junit47') URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/233#issuecomment-527205391 2. also, I am (almost) certain that I have what it takes

[GitHub] [maven-surefire] dejan2609 edited a comment on issue #233: [SUREFIRE-1494] default provider for JUnit4 integration tests is changed (from 'surefire-junit4' to 'surefire-junit47')

dejan2609 edited a comment on issue #233: [SUREFIRE-1494] default provider for JUnit4 integration tests is changed (from 'surefire-junit4' to 'surefire-junit47') URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/233#issuecomment-527205154 1. Ok, I need some explanation for this and hence

[GitHub] [maven-surefire] dejan2609 commented on issue #233: [SUREFIRE-1494] default provider for JUnit4 integration tests is changed (from 'surefire-junit4' to 'surefire-junit47')

dejan2609 commented on issue #233: [SUREFIRE-1494] default provider for JUnit4 integration tests is changed (from 'surefire-junit4' to 'surefire-junit47') URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/233#issuecomment-527205154 1. Ok, I need some explanation for this and hence I

[jira] [Commented] (MNG-6663) overriding parent dependency management doesn't work for transitive dependencies

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6663?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16920828#comment-16920828 ] Gabriel Belingueres commented on MNG-6663: -- Redefine the library version property set in parent

[jira] [Comment Edited] (MNG-6663) overriding parent dependency management doesn't work for transitive dependencies

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6663?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16920792#comment-16920792 ] Alireza Ghassemi edited comment on MNG-6663 at 9/2/19 11:37 AM:

[jira] [Commented] (MNG-6663) overriding parent dependency management doesn't work for transitive dependencies

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6663?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16920792#comment-16920792 ] Alireza Ghassemi commented on MNG-6663: --- [~belingueres] I updated the [^pom.xml] with your

[jira] [Commented] (MRESOLVER-93) StackOverflowError by PathRecordingDependencyVisitor

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MRESOLVER-93?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16920791#comment-16920791 ] Tomo Suzuki commented on MRESOLVER-93: -- [~tibordigana] How about "StackOverflowError by

[jira] [Updated] (MNG-6663) overriding parent dependency management doesn't work for transitive dependencies

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6663?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alireza Ghassemi updated MNG-6663: -- Attachment: pom.xml > overriding parent dependency management doesn't work for transitive >

[jira] [Updated] (MRESOLVER-93) StackOverflowError by PathRecordingDependencyVisitor

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MRESOLVER-93?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tomo Suzuki updated MRESOLVER-93: - Summary: StackOverflowError by PathRecordingDependencyVisitor (was:

[jira] [Created] (MNG-6755) Console remains colored on build failed

Peter Rader created MNG-6755: Summary: Console remains colored on build failed Key: MNG-6755 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6755 Project: Maven Issue Type: Bug

[jira] [Comment Edited] (MJAVADOC-602) "Aggregating Javadocs For Multi-Projects" code snippet is garbled and tag example is missing

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MJAVADOC-602?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16920464#comment-16920464 ] Falko Modler edited comment on MJAVADOC-602 at 9/2/19 9:20 AM: ---

[jira] [Updated] (MRESOLVER-93) PathRecordingDependencyVisitor to handle 3 cycles

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MRESOLVER-93?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tibor Digana updated MRESOLVER-93: -- Fix Version/s: 1.4.2 > PathRecordingDependencyVisitor to handle 3 cycles >

[jira] [Commented] (MRESOLVER-93) PathRecordingDependencyVisitor to handle 3 cycles

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MRESOLVER-93?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16920686#comment-16920686 ] Tibor Digana commented on MRESOLVER-93: --- [~suztomo] Can you find a better title for this bug?

[GitHub] [maven-resolver] Tibor17 commented on issue #39: [MRESOLVER-93] - PathRecordingDependencyVisitor to handle 3 cycles

Tibor17 commented on issue #39: [MRESOLVER-93] - PathRecordingDependencyVisitor to handle 3 cycles URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-resolver/pull/39#issuecomment-527045121 Any objections to merge this PR? The local build is successful.