[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-968?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=322028#comment-322028
]
nkeywal commented on SUREFIRE-968:
--
The single line one has the advantage of beeing easier to
nkeywal created SUREFIRE-969:
Summary: Log line on screen output
Key: SUREFIRE-969
URL: https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-969
Project: Maven Surefire
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-800?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=315774#comment-315774
]
nkeywal commented on SUREFIRE-800:
--
Would it be a solution to limit the usage of this
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-800?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=315619#comment-315619
]
nkeywal commented on SUREFIRE-800:
--
Thanks a lot for all this, Kristian.
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-800?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=315526#comment-315526
]
nkeywal commented on SUREFIRE-800:
--
Hi Kristian,
Any news on this?
Thanks!
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-800?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=313393#comment-313393
]
nkeywal commented on SUREFIRE-800:
--
Hi Kristian,
Did you have some time to look at this jira?
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-800?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=309041#comment-309041
]
nkeywal edited comment on SUREFIRE-800 at 9/19/12 8:05 AM:
---
2.12.3: cat
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-800?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=309041#comment-309041
]
nkeywal commented on SUREFIRE-800:
--
2.12.3: cat
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-800?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=308333#comment-308333
]
nkeywal commented on SUREFIRE-800:
--
Hi Kristian,
Any feedback on this patch? I think it fixes
nkeywal created SUREFIRE-909:
Summary: Wrong elapsed time calculation
Key: SUREFIRE-909
URL: https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-909
Project: Maven Surefire
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-800?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
nkeywal updated SUREFIRE-800:
-
Attachment: 800.v1.patch
Hi Kristian,
In 800.v1.patch, I tried the NonConcurrentReportManager approach, it
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-800?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=306133#comment-306133
]
nkeywal commented on SUREFIRE-800:
--
Thanks for the reply, it's a bad news for us...
It seems
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-800?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=306080#comment-306080
]
nkeywal commented on SUREFIRE-800:
--
Hello Kristian,
I had a look at the fix and its revert, I
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-799?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=289612#comment-289612
]
nkeywal commented on SUREFIRE-799:
--
Yes, I confirm it will relaunch a new jvm for each test.
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-799?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=289548#comment-289548
]
nkeywal commented on SUREFIRE-799:
--
Kristian renamed it to perthread in the trunk. It works well
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-800?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=287749#comment-287749
]
nkeywal commented on SUREFIRE-800:
--
This one is great! Thanks for all your help, Kristian.
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-798?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=287216#comment-287216
]
nkeywal commented on SUREFIRE-798:
--
As a side effect as well, note that when a forked process
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-813?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=286915#comment-286915
]
nkeywal commented on SUREFIRE-813:
--
Yes, it's consistent:we have many lines (~100) logged during
nkeywal created SUREFIRE-813:
Summary: Randomly wrong tests count and empty summary files with
JUnitProvider47 when forking the tests.
Key: SUREFIRE-813
URL: https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-813
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-813?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=286925#comment-286925
]
nkeywal commented on SUREFIRE-813:
--
What you mean for LogicalStream line 81 is that it's
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-813?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=286930#comment-286930
]
nkeywal commented on SUREFIRE-813:
--
Yep, with the synchronized all the events are received by
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-813?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=286939#comment-286939
]
nkeywal commented on SUREFIRE-813:
--
After more tests, I confirm it works well with the
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=286961#comment-286961
]
nkeywal commented on SUREFIRE-773:
--
It's easy to reproduce with a sleep like this:
{noformat}
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-799?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
nkeywal updated SUREFIRE-799:
-
Attachment: surefire_799.v2.patch
Allow test parallelisation when forkMode=always
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-799?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=286121#comment-286121
]
nkeywal commented on SUREFIRE-799:
--
v2 includes:
- integration test with
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-800?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=285891#comment-285891
]
nkeywal commented on SUREFIRE-800:
--
Note that with category implementation, we're now using
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-793?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=285895#comment-285895
]
nkeywal commented on SUREFIRE-793:
--
I have a partial fix for it: with the fix, the time reported
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-793?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=285911#comment-285911
]
nkeywal commented on SUREFIRE-793:
--
I checked, you're right, this works with forkMode=always
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-799?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=285597#comment-285597
]
nkeywal commented on SUREFIRE-799:
--
Ok, will do. Do you have something in mind for 2.12 release
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-793?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=285600#comment-285600
]
nkeywal commented on SUREFIRE-793:
--
Hi Kristian,
You changed the priority to minor (which is
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-799?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
nkeywal updated SUREFIRE-799:
-
Attachment: surefire_799_212_trunk.patch
Allow test parallelisation when forkMode=always
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-793?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=284967#comment-284967
]
nkeywal commented on SUREFIRE-793:
--
The original issue is fixed, thank you!
The difference
JUnit47 provider could print immediatly the test class name, as JUnit4, instead
of waiting for the test to finish.
--
Key: SUREFIRE-798
URL:
Allow test parallelisation when forkMode=always
---
Key: SUREFIRE-799
URL: https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-799
Project: Maven Surefire
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Junit
redirectTestOutputToFile is not taken into account with JUnit47 provider
Key: SUREFIRE-800
URL: https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-800
Project: Maven Surefire
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-800?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=284302#comment-284302
]
nkeywal commented on SUREFIRE-800:
--
Seems that I can't edit the title. It should be: not taken
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-760?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=284303#comment-284303
]
nkeywal commented on SUREFIRE-760:
--
Thanks a lot for the fix, Kristian!
mvn
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-798?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=284310#comment-284310
]
nkeywal commented on SUREFIRE-798:
--
Yes, it's when running in serial. I understand that in
JUnit47 provider does not take into account the test method specified on the
command line or the .pom
-
Key: SUREFIRE-796
URL:
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-793?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
nkeywal updated SUREFIRE-793:
-
Attachment: surefire_793_trunk.v3.patch
I've managed to reduce the changes to something small. Imperfect
JUnit47 provider reports incorrect time in the XML report
-
Key: SUREFIRE-793
URL: https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-793
Project: Maven Surefire
Issue Type: Bug
JUnit47 provider reports incorrect elapsed time on test failure.
Key: SUREFIRE-791
URL: https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-791
Project: Maven Surefire
Issue Type: Bug
Junit Category: Tests without category fail with the message
initializationError(org.junit.runner.manipulation.Filter) when groups is set
and forkMode=always
JUnit @Category are not taken into account if forkMode=always
-
Key: SUREFIRE-786
URL: https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-786
Project: Maven Surefire
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-786?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
nkeywal updated SUREFIRE-786:
-
Attachment: surefire786_trunk.patch
The patch fixes the issue for the classes. Only the needed class tests
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-786?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=283206#comment-283206
]
nkeywal edited comment on SUREFIRE-786 at 11/10/11 8:28 AM:
The patch
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=283160#comment-283160
]
nkeywal commented on SUREFIRE-329:
--
Hi Kristian, thanks for having integrated the functionality.
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=283030#comment-283030
]
nkeywal commented on SUREFIRE-329:
--
I tested the branch SUREFIRE329 above on Apache HBase,
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
nkeywal updated SUREFIRE-329:
-
Attachment: SUREFIRE329_branch329.patch
patch on top of the branch 329.
Support for JUNIT extensions
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=282509#comment-282509
]
nkeywal commented on SUREFIRE-329:
--
Kristian: Could you share the result of the tests you
50 matches
Mail list logo
