[GitHub] [maven-surefire] Tibor17 commented on issue #251: roadmap chart

2020-04-21 Thread GitBox
Tibor17 commented on issue #251: URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/251#issuecomment-617294943 @KroArtem The performance was improved in M5. We expect faster JVM startup and much faster teardown (10 millis). In the

[GitHub] [maven-surefire] Tibor17 commented on issue #251: roadmap chart

2020-04-20 Thread GitBox
Tibor17 commented on issue #251: URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/251#issuecomment-616729003 @Rajno1 Sorry for late reply. It's hard to answer because we don't see your project. Every time the user found and issue, we asked him to provide a project which can

[GitHub] [maven-surefire] Tibor17 commented on issue #251: roadmap chart

2020-04-20 Thread GitBox
Tibor17 commented on issue #251: URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/251#issuecomment-616571822 @KroArtem In M4 we reworked only the protocol and the OOP model regarding the facilities which are sending and receiving data. In M5 we extended the physical layer and made

[GitHub] [maven-surefire] Tibor17 commented on issue #251: roadmap chart

2019-11-04 Thread GitBox
Tibor17 commented on issue #251: roadmap chart URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/251#issuecomment-549587369 > > > @Tibor17 > is it really necessary to publish such roadmap? Maybe it is important for contributors/devs because some people at the U.S.

[GitHub] [maven-surefire] Tibor17 commented on issue #251: roadmap chart

2019-11-04 Thread GitBox
Tibor17 commented on issue #251: roadmap chart URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/251#issuecomment-549557044 @jon-bell @Col-E You are welcome to participate as well. This is an automated message from