[ 
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2978?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

David Hoffer updated MNG-2978:
------------------------------

    Attachment: VersionRangeSnapshotFix.patch

I have included a patch for this bug.  The fix is in the containsVersion method 
of VersionRange.  I have added tests in VersionRangeTest and 
DefaultArtifactCollectorTest.  All tests in maven pass with this fix.

> Assembly plugin does not resolve version ranges correctly
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MNG-2978
>                 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2978
>             Project: Maven 2
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.6
>         Environment: XP Pro SP2
>            Reporter: David Hoffer
>         Attachments: VersionRangeSnapshotFix.patch
>
>
> Similar to MRELEASE-134 in maven-release-plugin
> <dependency>
>             <groupId>myGroup</groupId>
>             <artifactId>myArtifact</artifactId>
>             <version>[1.0,)</version>
> </dependency>
> This version range can resolve to the latest development SNAPSHOT. All 
> artifact dependencies should ignore SNAPSHOTS as that is not intended by the 
> unbounded high end of the version range.  This should resolve to any released 
> version of 1.1 or higher.
> This document:
> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Dependency+Mediation+and+Conflict+Resolution#DependencyMediationandConflictResolution-DependencyVersionRanges
> addressed the requirements for version ranges and stated that "Resolution of 
> dependency ranges should not resolve to a snapshot (development version) 
> unless it is included as an explicit boundary". I think this requirement was 
> forgotten when version ranges were implemented.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to