[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MSHARED-1237?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17711701#comment-17711701
]
Herve Boutemy edited comment on MSHARED-1237 at 4/13/23 6:24 AM:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
from a technologist perspective, using a canonical id looks better
from a user experience perspective, it means that instead of seeing
"artifactId:version", it will be "groupId:artifactId:version": is it really a
better UX?
can we share in the description the initial output and the target output to
really see the changes and judge the improvement from a user visible point of
view?
was (Author: hboutemy):
from a technologist perspective, using a canonical id looks better
from a user experience perspective, it means that instead of seeing
"artifactId:version", it will be "groupId:artifactId:version": is it really a
better UX?
> Consistently use plugin id when creating logging output
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MSHARED-1237
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MSHARED-1237
> Project: Maven Shared Components
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: maven-reporting-exec
> Affects Versions: maven-reporting-exec-4.0.0-M6
> Reporter: Michael Osipov
> Assignee: Michael Osipov
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: maven-reporting-exec-4.0.0-M7
>
>
> When information about the plugin is logged instead of constructing an
> truncated id use canonical {{Plugin#getId()}} output.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
