[jira] [Commented] (MNG-6357) Dependency order should be nearest first

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17748655#comment-17748655 ] Tamas Cservenak commented on MNG-6357: -- The PR with [~suztomo] reproducer: {noformat} [cstamas@urnebes

[jira] [Commented] (MNG-6357) Dependency order should be nearest first

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17748214#comment-17748214 ] Tamas Cservenak commented on MNG-6357: -- Related experiment https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/1212

[jira] [Commented] (MNG-6357) Dependency order should be nearest first

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17747805#comment-17747805 ] Vladimir Sitnikov commented on MNG-6357: {quote}It would make more sense if direct dependencies are

[jira] [Commented] (MNG-6357) Dependency order should be nearest first

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17690804#comment-17690804 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on MNG-6357: - cowwoc commented on PR #281: URL:

[jira] [Commented] (MNG-6357) Dependency order should be nearest first

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17466309#comment-17466309 ] Jeff Hodges commented on MNG-6357: -- I've dropped a couple comments on the two PRs. Both PRs have only

[jira] [Commented] (MNG-6357) Dependency order should be nearest first

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17413761#comment-17413761 ] Michael Osipov commented on MNG-6357: - One needs to update the PR first. > Dependency order should be

[jira] [Commented] (MNG-6357) Dependency order should be nearest first

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17413377#comment-17413377 ] Jeff Maxwell commented on MNG-6357: --- Can we please get this issue added to 4.0? > Dependency order

[jira] [Commented] (MNG-6357) Dependency order should be nearest first

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17082550#comment-17082550 ] Tomo Suzuki commented on MNG-6357: -- For building a class path for different artifactIDs, it does not. >

[jira] [Commented] (MNG-6357) Dependency order should be nearest first

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17082482#comment-17082482 ] Elliotte Rusty Harold commented on MNG-6357: Wait, I'm confused. I thought this is how it did

[jira] [Commented] (MNG-6357) Dependency order should be nearest first

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16999016#comment-16999016 ] elharo commented on MNG-6357: - There might be other edge cases where this matters. For instance, imagine

[jira] [Commented] (MNG-6357) Dependency order should be nearest first

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16824520#comment-16824520 ] Tomo Suzuki commented on MNG-6357: -- I encountered this issue today. I had an assumption that Maven exec