[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3870?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15272922#comment-15272922
]
Stephan Erb commented on MESOS-3870:
Could MESOS-5332 be due to the out-of-order deliver mentioned
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3870?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15103504#comment-15103504
]
Neil Conway commented on MESOS-3870:
See also {{Slave::checkpointResources}}, which has a long comment
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3870?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14998837#comment-14998837
]
haosdent commented on MESOS-3870:
-
Ohoh, got it. Thank you for explanation.
> Prevent out-of-order
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3870?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14998737#comment-14998737
]
Neil Conway commented on MESOS-3870:
I don't see how: the routine acquires ProcessBase.mutex before
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3870?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14998805#comment-14998805
]
Neil Conway commented on MESOS-3870:
You mean "volatile"? The variable is read and written inside a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3870?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14998884#comment-14998884
]
haosdent commented on MESOS-3870:
-
I think have another case make same Process run in different thread.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3870?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14998806#comment-14998806
]
Neil Conway commented on MESOS-3870:
You mean "volatile"? The variable is read and written inside a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3870?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14998700#comment-14998700
]
haosdent commented on MESOS-3870:
-
Suppose a Process enqueue to runq twice(Or impossible, seems I could
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3870?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14998757#comment-14998757
]
haosdent commented on MESOS-3870:
-
Yes, but ProcessBase.state don't have violate. I am not sure if it will
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3870?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14998686#comment-14998686
]
haosdent commented on MESOS-3870:
-
I think ProcessManager could dequeue same Process in different work
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3870?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14998720#comment-14998720
]
Neil Conway commented on MESOS-3870:
A process can't be enqueued onto the runq twice. This is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3870?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14998730#comment-14998730
]
haosdent commented on MESOS-3870:
-
Yes, but I think it still could be enqueue twice? Because
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3870?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14998971#comment-14998971
]
haosdent commented on MESOS-3870:
-
... Looks not possible. Only after consume event A, ProcessBase.state
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3870?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14998677#comment-14998677
]
Neil Conway commented on MESOS-3870:
This should be accounted for by the fact that each process has a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3870?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14998605#comment-14998605
]
haosdent commented on MESOS-3870:
-
I think although send could be ordered when only have a connection, but
15 matches
Mail list logo