[jira] [Commented] (MESOS-3870) Prevent out-of-order libprocess message delivery

2016-05-05 Thread Stephan Erb (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3870?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15272922#comment-15272922 ] Stephan Erb commented on MESOS-3870: Could MESOS-5332 be due to the out-of-order deliver mentioned

[jira] [Commented] (MESOS-3870) Prevent out-of-order libprocess message delivery

2016-01-16 Thread Neil Conway (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3870?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15103504#comment-15103504 ] Neil Conway commented on MESOS-3870: See also {{Slave::checkpointResources}}, which has a long comment

[jira] [Commented] (MESOS-3870) Prevent out-of-order libprocess message delivery

2015-11-10 Thread haosdent (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3870?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14998837#comment-14998837 ] haosdent commented on MESOS-3870: - Ohoh, got it. Thank you for explanation. > Prevent out-of-order

[jira] [Commented] (MESOS-3870) Prevent out-of-order libprocess message delivery

2015-11-10 Thread Neil Conway (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3870?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14998737#comment-14998737 ] Neil Conway commented on MESOS-3870: I don't see how: the routine acquires ProcessBase.mutex before

[jira] [Commented] (MESOS-3870) Prevent out-of-order libprocess message delivery

2015-11-10 Thread Neil Conway (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3870?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14998805#comment-14998805 ] Neil Conway commented on MESOS-3870: You mean "volatile"? The variable is read and written inside a

[jira] [Commented] (MESOS-3870) Prevent out-of-order libprocess message delivery

2015-11-10 Thread haosdent (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3870?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14998884#comment-14998884 ] haosdent commented on MESOS-3870: - I think have another case make same Process run in different thread.

[jira] [Commented] (MESOS-3870) Prevent out-of-order libprocess message delivery

2015-11-10 Thread Neil Conway (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3870?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14998806#comment-14998806 ] Neil Conway commented on MESOS-3870: You mean "volatile"? The variable is read and written inside a

[jira] [Commented] (MESOS-3870) Prevent out-of-order libprocess message delivery

2015-11-10 Thread haosdent (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3870?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14998700#comment-14998700 ] haosdent commented on MESOS-3870: - Suppose a Process enqueue to runq twice(Or impossible, seems I could

[jira] [Commented] (MESOS-3870) Prevent out-of-order libprocess message delivery

2015-11-10 Thread haosdent (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3870?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14998757#comment-14998757 ] haosdent commented on MESOS-3870: - Yes, but ProcessBase.state don't have violate. I am not sure if it will

[jira] [Commented] (MESOS-3870) Prevent out-of-order libprocess message delivery

2015-11-10 Thread haosdent (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3870?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14998686#comment-14998686 ] haosdent commented on MESOS-3870: - I think ProcessManager could dequeue same Process in different work

[jira] [Commented] (MESOS-3870) Prevent out-of-order libprocess message delivery

2015-11-10 Thread Neil Conway (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3870?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14998720#comment-14998720 ] Neil Conway commented on MESOS-3870: A process can't be enqueued onto the runq twice. This is

[jira] [Commented] (MESOS-3870) Prevent out-of-order libprocess message delivery

2015-11-10 Thread haosdent (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3870?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14998730#comment-14998730 ] haosdent commented on MESOS-3870: - Yes, but I think it still could be enqueue twice? Because

[jira] [Commented] (MESOS-3870) Prevent out-of-order libprocess message delivery

2015-11-10 Thread haosdent (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3870?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14998971#comment-14998971 ] haosdent commented on MESOS-3870: - ... Looks not possible. Only after consume event A, ProcessBase.state

[jira] [Commented] (MESOS-3870) Prevent out-of-order libprocess message delivery

2015-11-10 Thread Neil Conway (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3870?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14998677#comment-14998677 ] Neil Conway commented on MESOS-3870: This should be accounted for by the fact that each process has a

[jira] [Commented] (MESOS-3870) Prevent out-of-order libprocess message delivery

2015-11-10 Thread haosdent (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3870?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14998605#comment-14998605 ] haosdent commented on MESOS-3870: - I think although send could be ordered when only have a connection, but