[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-7222?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Gavin updated MESOS-7222:
-------------------------
    Comment: was deleted

(was: www.rtat.net)

> Load authenticator modules as singletons
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MESOS-7222
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-7222
>             Project: Mesos
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: security
>            Reporter: Greg Mann
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: authentication, libprocess, mesosphere, tech-debt
>
> The Mesos master/agent code currently loads separate instances of an 
> authenticator module for each realm that the module is installed into. 
> {{initializeHttpAuthenticators()}} is [called multiple 
> times|https://github.com/apache/mesos/blob/a310bcc10b872b44fe6083756030daa96c21d141/src/master/master.cpp#L599-L638],
>  and each invocation [creates an 
> instance|https://github.com/apache/mesos/blob/a310bcc10b872b44fe6083756030daa96c21d141/src/common/http.cpp#L987-L988]
>  of the module.
> It would be better to create a singleton of each authenticator module. These 
> could be stored in a map, indexed by the module name. Note that libprocess's 
> {{setAuthenticator()}} helper currently accepts an {{Owned<Authenticator>}} 
> and takes ownership of each module instance. In order to pass ownership of 
> authenticator singletons to libprocess, {{setAuthenticator()}} could be 
> changed to something like the following:
> {code}
> Future<Nothing> setAuthenticator(
>     const map<string, Owned<Authenticator>> authenticators,
>     const map<string, string> authenticatorRealms);
> {code}
> Note that the current situation would cause a legitimate bug in the case of a 
> stateful authenticator module which is dynamically updated at runtime. This 
> could lead to inconsistent state across the module instances, when the author 
> intended for them to share a single global state.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to