[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6371?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Joseph Wu updated MESOS-6371:
-----------------------------
    Shepherd: Joseph Wu

> Remove the 'recover()' interface in 'ContainerLogger'.
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MESOS-6371
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6371
>             Project: Mesos
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: containerization
>            Reporter: Gilbert Song
>            Assignee: Gilbert Song
>              Labels: containerizer, logger, mesosphere
>
> This issue arises from the nested container support in Mesos.
> Currently, the container logger interface mainly contains `recover()` and 
> `prepare()` methods. The `prepare` will be called in containerizer::launch() 
> to launch a container, while `recover` will be called in 
> containerizer::recover() to recover containers. Both methods rely on 2 
> parameters: ExecutorInfo and sandbox directory. The sandbox directory for 
> nested containers can still be passed to the logger. However, because of 
> nested container support, ExecutorInfo is no longer available for nested 
> containers.
> In logger prepare, the ExecutorInfo is used for deliver FrameworkID, 
> ExecutorID, and Label for custom metadata. In containerizer launch, we can 
> still pass the ExecutorInfo of a nested container's top level parent to the 
> logger, so that those information will not be lost.
> In logger recover, since currently the logger is stateless, and most of the 
> logger modules are doing `noop` in logger::recover(). The recover interface 
> should exist together with `cleanup` method if the logger become stateful in 
> the future. To avoid adding tech debt in containerizer nested container 
> support, we should remove the `recover` in container logger for now (can add 
> it back together with `cleanup` in the future if the container logger become 
> stateful).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to