[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-8237?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Benjamin Mahler updated MESOS-8237:
-----------------------------------
    Sprint: Mesosphere Sprint 69

> Mesos injects Resource.allocation_info for all resource offers, regardless of 
> MULTI_ROLE opt-in
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MESOS-8237
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-8237
>             Project: Mesos
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: James DeFelice
>            Assignee: Benjamin Mahler
>              Labels: mesosphere
>
> In support of MULTI_ROLE capable frameworks, a Resource.allocation_info field 
> was added and the Resource math of the Mesos library was updated to check for 
> matching allocation_info when checking for (in)equality, addability, 
> subtractability, containment, etc. To compensate for these changes, the demo 
> frameworks of Mesos were updated to set the allocation_info for Resource 
> objects during the "matching phase" in which offers' resources are evaluated 
> in order for the framework to launch tasks. The Mesos demo frameworks NEEDED 
> to be updated because the Resource algebra within Mesos now depended on 
> matching allocation_info fields of Resource objects when executing algebraic 
> operations. See 
> https://github.com/apache/mesos/commit/c20744a9976b5e83698e9c6062218abb4d2e6b25#diff-298cc6a77862b7ff3422cd06c215ef28R91
>  .
> This poses a unique problem for **external** libraries that both aim to 
> support various frameworks, some that DO and some that DO NOT opt-in to the 
> MULTI_ROLE capability; specifically those external libraries that implement 
> Resource algebra that's consistent with what Mesos implements internally. One 
> such example of a library is mesos-go, though there are undoubtedly others. 
> The problem can be explained via this scenario: 
> {quote}
> Flo's mesos-go framework is running well, it doesn't opt-in to MULTI_ROLE 
> because it doesn't need multiple roles. His framework runs on a version of 
> Mesos that existed prior to integration of MULTI_ROLE support. His DC 
> operator upgrades the mesos cluster to the latest version. Flo rebuilds his 
> framework on the latest version of mesos-go and re-launches it on the 
> cluster. He observes that his framework receives offers, but rejects ALL of 
> them. Digging into the code he realizes that Mesos is injecting 
> allocation_info into Resource objects being offered to his framework, and 
> mesos-go considers allocation_info when comparing Resource objects (because 
> it's MULTI_ROLE compatible now), but his framework doesn't take this into 
> consideration when preparing its own Resource objects prior to the "resource 
> matching phase". The consequence is that Flo's framework is trying to match 
> against Resources that will never align because his framework isn't setting 
> an allocation_info that might possibly match the allocation_info that Mesos 
> is always injecting - regardless of the MULTI_ROLE capability (or lack 
> thereof in this case) of his framework.
> {quote}
> If Mesos were to strip the allocation_info from Resource objects, prior to 
> offering them to non-multi-role frameworks, then the problem illustrated 
> above would go away.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to