github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #3230:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/3230#issuecomment-912143300
We're marking this PR as stale due to lack of updates in the past few
months. If after another couple of weeks the stale label has not been removed
this PR will be
emiliosetiadarma commented on pull request #5363:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/5363#issuecomment-912115798
Hey @exceptionfactory, that makes sense, especially if more non-client based
SPPs are developed in the future as well.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache
exceptionfactory commented on pull request #5363:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/5363#issuecomment-912113112
Thanks for the feedback @emiliosetiadarma!
Good catch on the class names, I made the adjustments you suggested and also
added a note to the Administrator's Guide
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-9128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mike Thomsen reassigned NIFI-9128:
--
Assignee: Mike Thomsen
> Refactor nifi-kite-bundle to use JUnit 5
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-9127?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mike Thomsen resolved NIFI-9127.
Resolution: Won't Do
Apparently it does not have any tests. OBE.
> Refactor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-9127?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mike Thomsen closed NIFI-9127.
--
> Refactor nifi-kerberos-iaa-providers-bundle to use JUnit 5
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-9127?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mike Thomsen reassigned NIFI-9127:
--
Assignee: Mike Thomsen
> Refactor nifi-kerberos-iaa-providers-bundle to use JUnit 5
>
emiliosetiadarma commented on pull request #5363:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/5363#issuecomment-911920467
Hey David!
Thanks for continuing to build on what I worked on the past summer! Just
have a few input. I was able to run the build and verify that it was working. I
exceptionfactory commented on a change in pull request #5360:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/5360#discussion_r701250007
##
File path:
exceptionfactory commented on a change in pull request #5360:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/5360#discussion_r701250468
##
File path:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-9188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17408944#comment-17408944
]
Cemre Mengu edited comment on NIFI-9188 at 9/2/21, 4:14 PM:
[~jfrazee] thanks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-9188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17408944#comment-17408944
]
Cemre Mengu commented on NIFI-9188:
---
[~jfrazee] thanks a lot for the info! These make perfect sense. I
jfrazee commented on pull request #5364:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/5364#issuecomment-911833548
@cemremengu I left some comments in the JIRA pointing to some of the history
and discussion around this. I think we'll be happy to have a PR for this
(future tense), but I think
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-9188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17408934#comment-17408934
]
Joey Frazee commented on NIFI-9188:
---
[~cemremengu] This was a conscious decision because so many users
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-6241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17408889#comment-17408889
]
John Wise commented on NIFI-6241:
-
[~dsargrad] - I'm not sure if you've figured this out in the interim,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-9126?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mike Thomsen reassigned NIFI-9126:
--
Assignee: Mike Thomsen
> Refactor nifi-kafka-bundle to use JUnit 5
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-9125?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mike Thomsen reassigned NIFI-9125:
--
Assignee: Mike Thomsen
> Refactor nifi-jolt-record-bundle to use JUnit 5
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-9122?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mike Thomsen reassigned NIFI-9122:
--
Assignee: Mike Thomsen
> Refactor nifi-influxdb-bundle to use JUnit 5
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-9124?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mike Thomsen reassigned NIFI-9124:
--
Assignee: Mike Thomsen
> Refactor nifi-jms-bundle to use JUnit 5
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-9123?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mike Thomsen closed NIFI-9123.
--
> Refactor nifi-jetty-bundle to use JUnit 5
> -
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-9123?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mike Thomsen resolved NIFI-9123.
Resolution: Won't Do
Turned out to have no test code.
> Refactor nifi-jetty-bundle to use JUnit 5
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-9121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mike Thomsen reassigned NIFI-9121:
--
Assignee: Mike Thomsen
> Refactor nifi-ignite-bundle to use JUnit 5
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-9120?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mike Thomsen reassigned NIFI-9120:
--
Assignee: Mike Thomsen
> Refactor nifi-html-bundle to use JUnit 5
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-9119?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mike Thomsen reassigned NIFI-9119:
--
Assignee: Mike Thomsen
> Refactor nifi-hl7-bundle to use JUnit 5
>
simonbence commented on a change in pull request #5330:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/5330#discussion_r701061896
##
File path:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-splunk-bundle/nifi-splunk-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/splunk/PutSplunkHTTP.java
##
@@ -288,4
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-9118?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mike Thomsen reassigned NIFI-9118:
--
Assignee: Mike Thomsen
> Refactor nifi-hive-bundle to use JUnit 5
>
cemremengu edited a comment on pull request #5364:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/5364#issuecomment-911534395
I see however a bump to Java 11 would still be compatible for Java 8 users
not actually forcing anyone to migrate.
The problem with Java 8 is that it is very
cemremengu commented on pull request #5364:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/5364#issuecomment-911534395
I see however a bump to Java 11 would still be compatible for Java 8 users
not actually forcing anyone to migrate.
The problem with Java 8 is that it is very difficult
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-9117?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mike Thomsen reassigned NIFI-9117:
--
Assignee: Mike Thomsen
> Refactor nifi-hbase-bundle to use JUnit 5
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-9007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
naveen kumar saharan updated NIFI-9007:
---
Description:
We have two registry - non prod and prod registry
When we deploy into
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-9007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
naveen kumar saharan updated NIFI-9007:
---
Affects Version/s: 0.5.0
1.14.0
> flow sync from one registry
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-9188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Cemre Mengu updated NIFI-9188:
--
Description:
Since container uses binaries, and java 11 is backwards compatible is there any
reason
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-8293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17408600#comment-17408600
]
Mayki commented on NIFI-8293:
-
Any news please?
> ConsumeJMS and PublishJMS performance
>
cemremengu opened a new pull request #5364:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/5364
Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi.
Please provide a short description of the PR here:
Description of PR
update docker image to 11-jre
In order
34 matches
Mail list logo
